Abstract
Background
An audit of the hospital notes and letters of patients with epilepsy sent to general practitioners was undertaken.
Aims
(a) To examine the frequency of important omissions in history taking and role of precipitants in seizure control, (b) to determine whether appropriate investigations had been performed and their results, (c) to assess whether letters sent to GPs contain all the appropriate information and advice, and to evaluate the waiting time for out-patient clinics and investigations.
Methods
This retrospective study was conducted in a teaching hospital setting. A computerised search of the clinical database of a consultant neurologist was performed on patients with epilepsy. The notes of the first 100 names selected randomly by the computer were analysed. The study period was during the years 1998–2005. Age range was from 17–72 years. The male:female ratio was 1:1.
Conclusion
Major deficiencies in documentation were identified in this study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kampman MT, Johansen SV, Stenvold H et al (2005) Management of women with epilepsy: are guidelines being followed? Results from case-note reviews and a patient questionnaire. Epilepsia 46(8):1286–1292
Ryan J, Nash S, Lyndon J et al (1998) Epilepsy in the accident and emergency department developing a code of safe practice for adult patients. South East and South West Thames Accident and Emergency Speciality Sub-committees. J Accid Emerg Med 15(4):237–243
Martin H (2002) Improving doctors’ letters. MJA 177:516–520
Annegers JF, Shirts SB, Hauser WA, Kurland LT (1986) Risk of recurrence after an initial unprovoked seizure. Epilepsia 27:43–50
Mattson RH, Cramer JA, Collins JF (1996) Department of Veterans Affairs Epilepsy Co-operative Studies No. 118 and No. 264 Group. Prognosis for total control of complex partial and secondarily generalized tonic clonic seizures. Neurology 47:68–76
Jack CR Jr (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging in epilepsy. Mayo Clin 71:71–695
Shorvon SD (1991) Constitutional epilepsy. In: Walsh M, Oxbury JM (eds) Clinical neurology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 22m
Nakken KO, Refsland G, Lillestolen KM et al (2005) Seizure-precipitating factors in epilepsy—what do patients report? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 125:2172 (article in Norwegian)
Perucca E (2005) Birth defects after prenatal exposure to anti-epileptic drugs. Lancet Neurol 4:781–786
Pennell PB (2004) Pregnancy in women who have epilepsy. Neurol Clin 22:799–820
Finnell RH, Nau H, Yerby MS (1995) General principles: teratogenicity of antiepileptic drugs. In: Levy RH, Matson BS (eds) Antiepileptic drugs, vol 4. Raven Press, New York, pp 209–230
Lindhout D, Omtzigt JG (1994) Teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs: implications for the management of epilepsy in women of child bearing age. Epilepsia 35(Suppl 4):S19–S28
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iqbal, M., Bilal, S., Sarwar, S. et al. Epilepsy audit: do we document everything?. Ir J Med Sci 180, 31–35 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0542-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0542-y