Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap reconstruction of head and neck malignancy defects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With the advent of microsurgery the pedicled flap is considered by many to be an outdated surgical option.

Aims

To explore the relationship between flap survival and pre-morbid risk factors, conduct a comparative analysis of flap and systemic morbidities and complete a cosmesis and functionality assessment for oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction patients.

Methods

114 patients, over a 13-year period, who had a one-stage reconstructive procedure employing the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMF) or radial forearm-free flap (RFFF).

Results

Variables, including age, smoking and radiation exposure were not statistically significant predictors of flap survival probability. Atelectasis was a significant post-op finding of RFFF patients. Flap dehiscence of >50% was a significant morbidity of PMMF. No statistical difference in cosmetic deformity, diet and socialisation was noted.

Conclusions

Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap remains an enduring and safe flap; however, the RFFF has markedly improved speech performance over the PMMF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seidenberg B (1959) Immediate reconstruction of the cervical esophagus by a revascularized jejunal segment. Ann Surg 149:162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang GF, Chen PJ, Gao XY, Liu JL, Jiang SX, He SP (1981) Forearm free skin flap transplantation: a report of 56 cases. Chin Med J 61:139–141

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ariyan S (1979) Further experience with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps for the immediate repair of defects from excisions of head and neck cancers. Plast Reconstr Surg 64(5):605–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koh K, Eom J, Kirk I, Kim SY, Nam S (2006) Pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap in oropharyngeal reconstruction: revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(5):1145–1149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith GI, O’Brien CJ, Choy ET, Andruchow JL, Gao K (2005) Clinical outcome and technical aspects of 263 radial forearm free flaps used in reconstruction of the oral cavity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:199–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ijsselstein CB, Hovius SE, Ten Have BL et al (1996) Is the pectoralis myocutaneous flap in intraoral and oropharyngeal reconstruction outdated? Am J Surg 172(3):259–262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Metha S, Sarkar S, Kavarana N, Blathena H, Mehta A (1996) Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in the oral cavity: a prospective evaluation of 220 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 98(1):31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Funk GF, Laurenzo JF, Valentino J, McCulloch TM, Frodel JL, Hoffman HT (1995) Free tissue transfer reconstruction of midfacial and cranio-orbital-facial defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:293–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andrades P, Pehler S, Baranano C et al (2008) Fistula analysis after radial forearm free flap reconstruction of hypopharyngeal defects. Laryngoscope 118:1157–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. List MA, Ritter-Sterr C, Lansky SB (1990) A performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients. Cancer 66:564–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Woods JE (1987) Reconstruction in head and neck cancer: a place for conservatism. Ann Plast Surg 18:209–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schusterman MA, Horndeski G (1991) Analysis of the morbidity associated with immediate microvascular reconstruction in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 13:51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Haughey BH, Wilson E, Kluwe L, Piccirillo J, Fredrickson J, Sessions D, Spector G (2001) Free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: analysis of 241 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck 125(1):10–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shestak KC, Jones NF (1991) Microsurgical free tissue transfer in the elderly patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 88:259–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kroll SS, Robb GL, Reece GP (1998) Does prior irradiation increase the risk of total or partial free flap loss? J Reconstr Microsurg 14:263–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chick LR, Watson RL, Reus W, Colen L, Sasmor M (1992) Free flaps in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 1:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deraemaecker R, Andry G, Chantrain G, Greant P, Thill MP (1989) Free and pedicled flaps for head and neck reconstruction in radically irradiated fields. Eur J Surg Oncol 15:575–581

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroll SS, Goepfert H, Jones MJ, Guillamondegui O, Schusterman M (1990) Analysis of complications in 168 pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps used for head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 25:93–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Freedlander E, Espie CA, Campsie LM, Soutar DS, Robertson AG (1989) Functional implications of major surgery for intraoral cancer. Br J Plast Surg 42:266–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Su W, Yi J, Yen-Chine C, Shyi-Gen C, Hwa S (2003) Functional comparison after reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap or a pectoralis major flap for cancer of the tongue. Otolaryngol Head Neck 128(3):412–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. O’Neill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Neill, J.P., Shine, N., Eadie, P.A. et al. Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap reconstruction of head and neck malignancy defects. Ir J Med Sci 179, 337–343 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0468-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0468-4

Keywords

Navigation