Skip to main content
Log in

The analysis of the factors affecting lumbar spinal stenosis in adult patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In this study 67 lumbar spinal stenosis in adult patients operated in our clinic in 3 years are aimed to be analysed in terms of clinical and surgical techniques.

Methods

Diagnoses were made on the basis of patients’ histories and their clinical examinations.

Results

Average age was 52.16 ± 8.9 (33–64). 70.1% (47) of patients were females and 29.9% (20) were males. The most frequent neurological symptoms were 71.1% lasque (+) and 56.7% sensory loss. The anterior–posterior diameter was below 11.5 mm in 56.7% of the cases. Partial recovery was observed in the early term of 71.6% the cases. 56.7% of the cases were applied total laminectomy.

Conclusion

Decompressive laminectomy can be performed safely and effectively in patients of with lumbar stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deen GH, Zimmerman RS, Lyons MK, Wharew RE, Reımer R (1993) Analysis of early factors following lumbar decompressive laminectomy for spinal stenosis. Presented at the 44th annual meeting of the congress of neurological surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, 1–6

  2. Epstein JA, Epstein NE (1997) Lumbar spinal stenosis. In: Youmans Julian R (ed) Neurosurgical surgery, Ch 106, vol 3, 4th edn. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA (CD edition)

  3. Gelalis ID, Stafilas KS, Korompilias AV, Zacharis KC, Beris AE, Xenakis TA (2006) Decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: long-term results. Int orthop 30(1):59–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goh KJ, Khalifa W, Anslow P, Cadoux-Hudson T, Donaghy M (2004) The clinical syndrome associated with lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Neurol 52(4):242–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Halls S, Bartleson JD (1985) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients. Ann Intern Med 103(2):271–275

    Google Scholar 

  6. Herno A (1995) Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl 210:1–969

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jonsson B, Stromqvist B (1993) Symptoms and signs in degeneration of the lumbar spine. A prospective consecutive study of 300 operated patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75B(3):381–385

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonsson B, Annertz M, Sjoberg C, Stromqvist B (1997) A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: clinical features related to radiographic findings. Spine 22(24):2932–2937

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaptan H, Kasımcan O, Çakıroğlu K, İlhan MN, Kılıç C (2007) Lumbar spinal Stenosis in elderly patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1100:173–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kabre A, Ba MC, Cisse R, Sorgho Lougue C, Doli P, Kabore J (2003) Lumbar canal stenosis in Ouagadougou: aetiological, clinical aspects and prognosis regarding 80 cases. Dakar Med 48(2):138–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN, Fossel AH, Lew RA, Liang MH (1995) Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after for laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20:1155–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lange M, Hamburger C, Waidhauser E (1993) Surgical treatment and results in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenoses. Neurosurg Rev 16(1):27–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee CK, Hansen HT, Weiss AB (1978) Developmental lumbar spinal stenosis. Pathology and surgical treatment. Spine 3(3):246–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lombardini JS, Wiltse LL, Reynolt J, Widell EH, Spencer C 3rd (1985) Treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 10:821–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pappas CT, Sonttag VKH (1994) Lumbar stenosis in elderly. Neurosurg Q 4:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rillardon L, Guigui P, Veil-Picard A, Slulittel H, Deburge A (2003) Long-term results of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(7):621–631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scholz M, Firsching R, Lanksch WR (1998) Long-term follow up in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spinal Cord 36(3):200–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Silvers HR, Lewis PJ, Asch HL (1993) Decompressive lumbar laminectomy for spinal stenosis. J Neurosurg 78(5):695–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wharen RE, Reimer R (1996) Degenerative lumbar stenosis treated by decompression without fusion. Tech Neurosurg 2(4):212–222

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Kaptan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaptan, H., Ilhan, M., Cakiroglu, K. et al. The analysis of the factors affecting lumbar spinal stenosis in adult patients. Ir J Med Sci 179, 365–368 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0466-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0466-6

Keywords

Navigation