Abstract
Aim
This study compared the efficacy and patient acceptability of two methods of bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Methods
Patients attending for outpatient flexible sigmoidoscopy were prospectively randomized to receive one Fleet ready-to-use enema or 2 × 4 g glycerin suppositories, 2 h preprocedure. Patient and endoscopist questionnaires were used to compare the outcomes.
Results
From November 2000 to August 2001, 203 (male = 95; female = 108) patients were randomized. Patient data available for 163 patients (enema = 93; suppository = 70) revealed: ease of use (enema = 52; suppository = 25; P < 0.02, Fisher’s exact); assistance required (enema = 19; suppository = 3; P < 0.005, Fisher’s exact); grade of effectiveness (enema = 83; suppository = 44; P < 0.0001, Fisher’s exact), and whether patients wished to try another preparation in future (enema = 16; suppository = 24; P = 0.016, Fisher’s exact). Endoscopist data available for 151 patients (enema = 76; suppository = 75) revealed: average depth of insertion (enema = 53.6 ± 11.6 cm; suppository 46.3 ± 13.7 cm; P < 0.001, Student’s t test); acceptable (excellent + good) quality of preparation [enema = 60 (78.9%); suppository = 34 (45.3%); P < 0.0001, Fisher’s exact].
Conclusion
Bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy using a single Fleet enema is acceptable to patients and more effective than glycerin suppositories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papagrigoriadis S, Arunkumar I, Koreli A et al (2004) Evaluation of flexible sigmoidoscopy as an investigation for “left sided” colorectal symptoms. Postgrad Med J 80:104–106
Ashley OS, Nadel M, Ransohoff DF (2001) Achieving quality in flexible sigmoidoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Am J Med 111:643–653
Fincher RK, Oscar EM, Jackson JL et al (1999) A comparison of bowel preparations for flexible sigmoidoscopy: oral magnesium citrate combined with oral Bisacodyl, one hypertonic phosphate enema or two hypertonic phosphate enemas. Am J of Gastroenterol 94:2122–2127
Bini EJ, Unger JS, Reiber JM et al (2000) Prospective, randomized, single blind comparison of two preparations for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 52:218–222
Preston KL, Peluso FE, Goldner F (1994) Optimal bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy: are two enemas better than one. Gastrointest Endosc 40:474–476
Drew PJ, Hughes M, Hodson R et al (1997) The optimum bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Eur J Surg Oncol 23:315–316
Weiss BD, Watkins S (1985) Bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy. J Fam Pract 21:285–287
Manoucheri M, Nakamura DY, Lukman RL (1999) Bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy; which method yields the best results? J Fam Pract 48:272–274
Brown AR, DiPalma JA (2004) Bowel preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 6:395–401
Atkin WS, Hart A, Edwards R (2000) Single blind randomized trial of efficacy and acceptability of oral Picolax versus self administered phosphate enema in bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. BMJ 320:1504–1509
Bulmer M, Hartley J, Lee PW et al (2000) Improving the view in the rectal clinic: a randomized control trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:210–212
Faigel DO, Eisen GM, Baron TH et al (2003) For the standards of practice committee, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: preparation of patients for GI endoscopy. Gastrointes Endosc 57:446–450
Osgard E, Jeffrey L, Jackson et al (1998) A Randomized trial comparing three methods of bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 93:1126–1130
Lund JN, Buckley D, Bernnett D et al (1998) A randomized trial of hospital versus home administered enemas for flexible sigmoidoscopy. BMJ 317:1201
Forster JA, Thomas WM (2003) Patient preferences and side effects experienced with oral bowel preparations versus self-administered phosphate enema. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:185–186
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Underwood, D., Makar, R.R., Gidwani, A.L. et al. A prospective randomized single blind trial of Fleet phosphate enema versus glycerin suppositories as preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy. Ir J Med Sci 179, 113–118 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0403-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0403-8