Measuring and benchmarking safety culture: application of the safety attitudes questionnaire to an acute medical admissions unit

Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the safety culture in an acute medical admissions unit (AMAU) of a teaching hospital in order to benchmark results against international data and guide a unit-based, integrated, risk management strategy.

Methods

The safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ), a validated instrument for the measurement of safety culture was applied to an AMAU. All AMAU healthcare staff (n = 92) were surveyed: doctors, nurses, healthcare assistants (HCAs) and allied healthcare professionals (AHPs). Safety attitude scores for the overall unit and individual caregiver types were assessed across six domains of safety culture.

Results

When compared against an international benchmark, the AMAU scored significantly higher for four of the six safety domains: p < 0.01 for ‘teamwork climate’, ‘safety climate’ and ‘stress recognition’ and p < 0.05 for ‘job satisfaction’. The difference between nurse manager scores and the overall mean for the study group was statistically significant for the domains of ‘teamwork climate’ (p < 0.05) and ‘safety climate’ (p < 0.01). HCAs scored significantly lower relative to staff overall with regard to ‘working conditions’ (p < 0.05) and ‘perceptions of management’ (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

The SAQ was successfully applied to an AMAU setting giving a valuable insight into staff issues of concern across the safety spectrum: employee and environmental safety, clinical risk management and medication safety.

Keywords

Safety culture Medication safety Patient safety 

References

  1. 1.
    Colla J, Bracken A, Kinney L, Weeks W (2005) Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys. Qual Saf Health Care 14:364–366. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.014217 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sexton J, Helmreich R, Neilands T, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J et al (2006) The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res 6(1):44. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-44 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Helmreich R, Merritt A (1998) Culture at work in aviation and medicine: national, organisational and professional influences. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helmreich R, Foushee H, Benson R, Russini W (1986) Cockpit management attitudes: exploring the attitude-behaviour linkage. Aviat Space Environ Med 57:1198–1200PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gregorich S, Helmreich R, Wilhelm J (1990) The structure of cockpit management attitudes. J Appl Psychol 75:682–690. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.682 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Helmreich R, Wilhelm J (1991) Outcomes of crew resource management training. Int J Aviat Psychol 1:287–300. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0104_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Irwin C (1991) The impact of initial and recurrent cockpit management resource training on attitudes. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on aviation psychology. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, pp 344–349Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sexton J, Thomas E, Helmreich R (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys. BMJ 320(7237):745–749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Makary M, Sexton J, Freischlag J, Millman E, Pryor D, Holzmueller C et al (2006) Patient safety in surgery. Ann Surg 243(5):628–635. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000216410.74062.0f CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pronovost P, Miller M, Wachter R (2006) Tracking progress in patient safety: an elusive target. JAMA 296(6):696–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kohn K, Corrigan J, Donaldson M (1999) To err is human; building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sexton J, Thomas E, Grillo S (2008) The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) guidelines for administration, 2003. The University of Texas Center of Excellence for Patient Safety Research and Practice. Technical Report 03-02. http://wwwuthtmcedu/schools/med/imed/patient_safety/survey&toolshtm. Accessed 20 Aug 2008
  13. 13.
    Pronovost P, Sexton B (2005) Assessing safety culture: guidelines and recommendations. Qual Saf Health Care 14(4):231–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moloney E, Bennett K, O’ Riordan D, Silke B (2006) Emergency department census of patients awaiting admission following reorganisation of an admissions process. Emerg Med J 23:363–367. doi:10.1136/emj.2005.028944 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moloney E, Smith D, Bennett K, O’ Riordan D, Silke B (2005) Impact of an acute medical admission unit on length of hospital stay, and emergency department ‘wait times’. QJM 98:283–289. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hci044 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rooney T, Moloney E, Bennett K, O’ Riordan D, Silke B (2008) Impact of an acute medical admission unit on hospital mortality: a 5-year prospective study. QJM 101:457–465. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcn025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Modak I, Sexton J, Lux T, Helmreich R, Thomas E (2007) Measuring safety culture in the ambulatory setting; The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire—ambulatory version. J Gen Intern Med 22:1–5. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0114-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simon JL (1997) Resampling: the new statistics, 2nd ednGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Makary M, Sexton J, Freischlag J, Holzmueller C, Millman A, Rowen L et al (2006) Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. J Am Coll Surg 202(5):746. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schneider P (2002) Measuring medication safety in hospitals. Am J Health Syst Pharm 59:2313–2314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Health Organisation draft guidelines for adverse event reporting and learning systems: from information to action. World Alliance for Patient Safety, 2005. http://www.who.int/patientsafety/reporting_and_learning/en/. Accessed 20 Aug 2008
  22. 22.
    Morimoto T, Gandhi TK, Seger AC, Hsieh TC, Bates DW (2004) Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods. Qual Saf Health Care 13(4):306–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pronovost P, Berenholtz S, Goeschel C, Needham D, Sexton J, Thompson D et al (2006) Creating high reliability in health care organizations. Health Serv Res 41(4p2):1599–1617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rivard PE, Rosen AK, Carroll JS (2006) Enhancing patient safety through organizational learning: are patient safety indicators a step in the right direction? Health Serv Res 41(4p2):1633–1653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Flin R (2007) Measuring safety culture in healthcare: a case for accurate diagnosis. Saf Sci 45(6):653. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pronovost P, Weast B, Rosenstein BJ, Sexton B, Holzmueller C, Paine L et al (2005) Implementing and validating a comprehensive unit-based safety program. J Patient Saf 1(1):33–40. doi:10.1097/01209203-200503000-00008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Relihan
    • 1
  • S. Glynn
    • 2
  • D. Daly
    • 3
  • B. Silke
    • 4
  • S. Ryder
    • 5
  1. 1.Medication SafetySt. James’s HospitalDublin 8Ireland
  2. 2.Risk ManagementSt. James’s HospitalDublin 8Ireland
  3. 3.Health and SafetySt. James’s HospitalDublin 8Ireland
  4. 4.Acute Medical Admissions UnitSt. James’s HospitalDublin 8Ireland
  5. 5.School of Pharmacy, Trinity CollegeDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations