Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pap smears for men: a vision of the future?

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) rarely receives as much publicity as its neighbouring orifice, the cervix. As in the cervix, intraepithelial neoplasias are precursors to cancer in the anal canal. AIN and cervical interstitial neoplasia (CIN) undergo dysplasia as a consequence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Since the advent of screening with the Pap smear in CIN, cervical cancer has plummeted to a fifth of its initial incidence. Anal cancer, however, has been rising, with a predilection for human immunodeficiency virus-infected men. HPV causes a squamous epithelial dysplasia and converts healthy tissue into AINs of increasing severity until anal cancer manifests.

Clinical case

This article describes a clinical case of anogenital HPV infection refractory to medical and surgical therapy. It also describes an effective surgical excision technique associated with a good cosmetic outcome.

Conclusions

The paper concludes by briefly discussing the implications of a national screening programme against AIN in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daling JR, Weiss NS, Hislop TG et al (1987) Sexual practices, sexually transmitted diseases, and the incidence of anal cancer. N Engl J Med 317:973–977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Palefsky JM (2000) Anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men and women. Semin Oncol 27:471–479

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson LG, Madeleine MM, Newcomer LM, Schwartz SM, Daling JR (2004) Anal cancer incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results experience, 1973–2000. Cancer 101:281–288. doi:10.1002/cncr.20364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldie SJ, Kuntz KM, Weinstein B, Freedberg KA, Welton ML, Palefsky JM (1999) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in homosexual and bisexual HIV-positive men. JAMA 281:1822–1829. doi:10.1001/jama.281.19.1822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Matthews WC (2003) Screening for anal dysplasia associated with human papillomavirus. Top HIV Med 11(2):45–49

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kulasingam SL, Bernard S, Barnabas RV, Largeron N, Myers ER (2008) Adding a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine to the UK cervical cancer screening programme: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 6:4. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-6-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim JJ, Andres-Beck B, Goldie SJ (2007) The value of including boys in an HPV vaccination programme: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a low-resource setting. Br J Cancer 97(9):1322–1328. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Written consent was obtained from the patient prior to the publication of this case.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. F. Oon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oon, S.F., Hanly, A. & Winter, D.C. Pap smears for men: a vision of the future?. Ir J Med Sci 179, 459–462 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0340-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0340-6

Keywords

Navigation