Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Late-onset CMV disease following CMV prophylaxis

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic infection after solid-organ transplantation, increasing morbidity and mortality. Three months of oral valganciclovir have been shown to provide effective prophylaxis. Late-onset CMV disease, occurring after the discontinuation of prophylaxis, is now increasingly recognised.

Aims

To investigate the incidence and the time of detection of CMV infections in liver transplant recipients who received CMV prophylaxis.

Methods

Retrospective review of 64 high- and moderate-risk patients with 1 year of follow-up.

Results

The incidence of CMV infection was 12.5%, with 4.7% disease. All cases of symptomatic CMV disease were of late-onset.

Conclusions

The incidence of CMV infections in this study was low compared with literature reports; however, the late-onset disease is an emerging problem. Detection of late-onset disease may be delayed because of less frequent clinic follow-up visits. Increased regular laboratory monitoring may allow earlier detection at the asymptomatic infection stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Razonable RR, Emery VC (2004) Management of CMV infection and disease in transplant patients (Consensus article: International Herpes Management Forum management recommendations). Herpes 11:77–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel R, Paya CV (1997) Infections in solid-organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:86–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hodson EM, Barclay PG, Craig JC, et al (2005) Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients (Cochrane review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD003774

  4. Snydman DR (1999) Infection in solid organ transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 1:21–28. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3062.1999.10103.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baillie GM (2006) Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant patients: prophylactic versus preemptive therapy. Am J Health Syst Pharm 63(Suppl 5):10–16. doi:10.2146/ajhp060378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. (2004) Cytomegalovirus. Am J Transplant 4(Suppl 10):51–58

  7. Preiksaitis JK, Brennan DC, Fishman J et al (2005) Canadian Society of Transplantation consensus workshop on cytomegalovirus management in solid organ transplantation final report. Am J Transplant 5:218–227. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00692.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. British Transplantation Society (2004) Guidelines for the prevention and management of cytomegalovirus disease after solid organ transplantation, 2nd edn. British Transplantation Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCormick PA, Kennedy F (2007) National liver unit liver transplant guidelines. St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDevitt LM (2006) Etiology and impact of cytomegalovirus disease on solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 63(Suppl 5):3–9. doi:10.2146/ajhp060377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh N (2006) Cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients: new challenges and their implications for preventive strategies. J Clin Virol 35:474–477. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2005.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Limaye AP, Bakthavatsalam R, Kim HW et al (2006) Impact of cytomegalovirus in organ transplant recipients in the era of antiviral prophylaxis. Transplantation 81(12):1645–1652. doi:10.1097/01.tp.0000226071.12562.1a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Gascun CF, Houlihan D, Coughlan S et al (2006) Cytomegalovirus infection in recipients of liver transplant in Ireland (abstract no. P753). Clin Microbiol Infect 12(Suppl 4)

  14. Gane E, Saliba F, Valdecasas GJC et al (1997) Randomised trial of efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir in the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in liver-transplant recipients. Lancet 350:1729–1733. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)05535-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paya C, Humar A, Dominguez E et al (2004) Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir versus oral ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 4:611–620. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00382.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arthurs SK, Eid AJ, Pedersen RA et al (2007) Delayed-onset primary cytomegalovirus disease after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 13(12):1703–1709. doi:10.1002/lt.21280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh N (2006) Antiviral drugs for cytomegalovirus in transplant recipients: advantages of preemptive therapy. Rev Med Virol 16:281–287. doi:10.1002/rmv.513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Donnelly.

Additional information

This research was undertaken as part of an MSc in Hospital Pharmacy, awarded by Trinity College Dublin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donnelly, C., Kennedy, F., Keane, C. et al. Late-onset CMV disease following CMV prophylaxis. Ir J Med Sci 178, 333–336 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0327-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-009-0327-3

Keywords

Navigation