Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Changing trends in surgical treatment of carotid disease in Ireland (1996–2003)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a well-established method of stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic, high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis.

Aims

To assess the change in carotid surgery practice in health board regions in Ireland over two different time periods in the past 11 years (1996–1998/2001–2003).

Methods

Numbers of discharges of patients with a procedure code CEA (38.12) between 1996–1998 and 2001–2003 were obtained from the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) database maintained by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI). Population data was obtained from national censuses.

Results

There has been considerable change in the level of carotid surgery activity in specific health board regions between the two periods.

Conclusions

Still no region comes close to achieving levels of CEA recommended by population studies. This is important in the context of the MRC asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST), as the numbers suitable for CEA will probably increase further in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eastcott HH, Pickering GW, Rob CG (1954) Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia. Lancet 267(6846):994–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gillum RF (1995) Epidemiology of carotid endarterectomy and cerebral arteriography in the United States. Stroke 26(9):1724–1728

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Easton JD, Sherman DG (1977) Stroke and mortality rate in carotid endarterectomy: 228 consecutive operations. Stroke 8(5):565–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial collaborators (1991). N Engl J Med 325(7): 445–453

    Google Scholar 

  5. MRC European carotid surgery trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. European carotid surgery trialists’ collaborative group (1991). Lancet 337(8752):1235–1243

  6. Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J et al (2004) MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363(9420):1491–1502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive committee for the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study (1995). JAMA 273(18):1421–1428

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown MM, Humphrey PRD, Association of British Neurologists (1992) Carotid endarterectomy: recommendations for management of transient ischaemic attacks and ischaemic stroke. BMJ 305:1071–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies AH, Irvine CD (1998) Are there population differences in prevalence and incidence of transient ischaemic attacks? In: Greenhalgh RM, Fowkes FER (eds) Trials and tribulations of vascular surgery. WB Saunders, London, p 93

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eikelboom BC (1993) Prevalence of asymptomatic carotid disease. In: Bernstein EF, Callow AD, Nicolaides AN, Shifrin EG (eds) Cerebral revascularisation. Med Orion, London, pp 451–456

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adam DJ, Bain M, Shanks E, Bradbury AW (1998) Geographical inequality in the provision of carotid endarterectomy in Scotland. Scottish Vascular Audit Group. Br J Surg 85(8):1075–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tu JV, Hannan EL, Anderson GM et al (1998) The fall and rise of carotid endarterectomy in the United States and Canada. N Engl J Med 339(20):1441–1447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Halliday A, Naylor R, Rothwell P et al. UK Carotid Endarterectomy Audit (UKCEAA). Presentation Stroke Association 10th Scientific Conference. Available at http:\\www.stroke.org.uk/document.rm?id = 383

  14. Feasby TE, Quan H, Ghali WA (2001) Geographical variation in the rate of carotid endarterectomy in Canada. Stroke 32(10):2417–2422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’ Loughlin R, Allwright S, Barry J et al (2005) Using HIPE data as a research and planning tool: limitations and opportunities. Irish J Med Sci 174(2):40–5 disussion 52–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Halliday A (2006) The asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) has changed clinical practice. More Vascular and Endovascular Controversies. 28th International Charing Cross Symposium. BIBA publishing, London, pp 56–60

  17. Kavanagh E (2008). CEA results from Ireland. Presentation Spring meeting: The Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Dublin, March

  18. Naylor AR (2008) Is surgery still generally the first choice intervention in patients with carotid artery disease? Surgeon 6(1):6–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roubin GS, Iyer S, Halkin A et al (2006) Realizing the potential of carotid artery stenting: Proposed paradigms for patient selection and procedural technique. Circulation 113:2021–2030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Professor Miriam Wiley and Ms.Aisling Mulligan of the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) and the staff of The Central Statistics Office

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Quinlan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quinlan, M.R., Egan, B., Feeley, T.M. et al. Changing trends in surgical treatment of carotid disease in Ireland (1996–2003). Ir J Med Sci 177, 193–196 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-008-0178-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-008-0178-3

Keywords

Navigation