Abstract
Background
Temporary ureteric stent insertion is an integral part of modern endo-urological practice. Delayed stent removal or forgotten stents are associated with increased patient morbidity and complications which are often difficult to manage.
Methods and results
We prospectively audited our ureteric stent insertion and removal logbook system to determine the value and effectiveness of our stent follow-up. Over a 1-year period, 210 ureteric stents were inserted in our urological unit. Of these, 47 (22.4%) patients were unaccounted as having their stents removed within the stent logbooks. One patient was lost to follow-up and re-presented with stent encrustation 10 months later.
Conclusions
Our results in this audit suggest that our system of ureteric stent follow-up is not effective. We have now introduced a new system that we feel is a safer and a satisfactory alternative to the stent logbooks. This includes a patient education leaflet and removal date scheduling prior to discharge from hospital.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Finey RP (1978) Experience with new double J uretheral catheter stent. J Urol 120:678
Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev M, Nissenkorn I (2000) The indwelling ureteric stent: a friendly procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. BJU Int 85:408–411
Monga M, Klein E, Wilfrido RC-Z, Thomas R (1995) The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: a urological dilemma. J Urol 153:1817–1819
Park K, Jeon SS, Park H, Kim HH (2004) Clinical features determining the fate of long-term, indwelling, forgotten double J stents. Urol Res 32(6):416–420
McCahy PJ, Ramsden PD (1996) A computerized ureteric stent retrieval system. BJU Int 77:147–148
Roberts KJ (1999) Patient empowerment in the United States: a critical commentary. Health Exp 2:82–92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, A.Z., Casey, R.G., Grainger, R. et al. The forgotten ureteric JJ stent and its prevention: a prospective audit of the value of a ureteric stent logbook . Ir J Med Sci 176, 117–119 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-007-0043-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-007-0043-9