Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative selection of symptomatic breast cancer patients appropriate for lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study examines whether preoperative ultrasound-assessed tumour diameter and diagnostic core biopsy-determined grade can be used to select those most likely to benefit from SLNB (i.e. those that are “node negative”) before their definitive operation.

Methods

Breast ultrasound (US) and a simultaneous core biopsy was performed in all patients at their initial presentation, and their estimates of tumor size and grade compared with the final pathological specimen (FPS).

Results

Of the T1 group 47% had lymphatic metastases as did 49% of those with grade I or II cancers. By combining these measures, however, subgroups of patients with lower rates of nodal metastases were identified (32% of patients with T1, non-grade III disease had lymphatic disease while only 15% of those with T < 1.5 cm, non-grade III cancers had such metastases).

Conclusion

Combination of the US and ultrasound guided core biopsy (UGCB) may however identify subgroups unlikely to have axillary disease that are therefore suitable for SLNB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blanchard DK, Donohue JH, Reynolds C, Grant CS (2003) Relapse and morbidity in patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy alone or with axillary dissection for breast cancer. Arch Surg 138:482–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beenkein SW, Urist MM, Zhang Y et al (2003) Axillary lymph node status, but not tumour size, predicts locoregional recurrence and overall survival after mastectomy fro breast cancer. Ann Surg 237(5):732–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Noguchi M (2002) Sentinel node biopsy and breast cancer. Br J Surg 89:21–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karamlou T, Johnson NM, Chan B, Franzini D, Mahin D (2003) Accuracy of intraoperative touch imprint cytologic analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Am J Surg 185(5):425–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mullenix PS, Carter PL, Martin MJ et al (2003) Predictive value of intraoperative touch preparation analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for axillary metastasis in breast cancer. Am J Surg 185(5):420–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman CS, Jacobson-Kaufman MFT, Thorndike-Christ T, Kaufman L, Tabar L (2001) A treatment scale for axillary management in breast cancer. Am J Surg 182(4):377–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bevilacqua JLB, Cody HS, MacDonald KA et al (2002) A model for the predicting axillary node metastases based on 2000 sentinel node procedures and tumour position. EJSO 28(5):490–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Hubbard AL (1997) Screening status in relation to biological and chronological characteristics of breast cancers: a cross-sectional survey. J Med Screen 4:152–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Skinner KA, Silberman H, Sposto R, Silverstein MJ (2001) Palpable breast cancers are inherently different from non-palpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 8:705–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Groenendijk RP, Bult P, Tewarie L et al (2000) Screen detected breast cancers have a lower mitotic activity index. Br J Cancer 82:381–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bloom HJ, Richardson WW (1957) Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 11:359–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scarff RW, Torloni H (1968) Histological typing of breast tumours. In: Sobin LH (ed) International histological classification of tumours, no. 2, vol 2. World Health Organisation, Geneva, pp 13–20

  13. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL (1994) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 220:391–401

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JX, Fairbanks JT (1993) Surgical resection and radiolocalisation of the sentinel node in breast cancer using the gamma probe. Surg Oncol 2:335–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Barth A, Craig PH, Silverstein MJ (1997) Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with T1 breast carcinoma. Cancer 79:1856–1864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE (1989) Relation of tumour size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 63:181–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Holland PA, Wall J, Boggis CRM et al (1996) A comparison of axillary lymph node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds. Br J Cancer 74:1643–1646

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V et al (1997) Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet 349:1864–1867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chadha M, Chabon AB, Friedmann P, Vikram B (1994) Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with T1 breast cancer. Cancer 73:350–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Olivotto IA, Jackson JSH, Mates D et al (1998) Prediction of axillary lymph node involvement of women with invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 83:948–955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hieken TJ, Harrison J, Herreros J, Velasco JM (2001) Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size. Am J Surg 182(4):351–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Groenendijk RP, Bult P, Noppen CM et al (2003) Mitotic activity index in interval breast cancers. Eur J Surg Oncol 29(1):29–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tubiana M, Koscielny S (1999) The rationale for early diagnosis of cancer-the example of breast cancer. Acta Oncol 38(3):295–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brenin DR, Manasseh DM, El Tamer M et al (2001) Factors correlating with lymph node metastases in Patients with T1 Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 8(5):432–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jakub JW, Ebert MD, Diaz NM et al (2003) Effect of lymphatic mapping on diagnosis and treatment of patients with T1a, T1b favourable breast cancer. Ann Surg 237(6):838–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Barry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry, M., Cahill, R.A., Roche-Nagle, G. et al. Preoperative selection of symptomatic breast cancer patients appropriate for lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy. Ir J Med Sci 176, 91–96 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-007-0034-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-007-0034-x

Keywords

Navigation