Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Nature Reserves on the Rural Household's Livelihood Vulnerability In Surrounding Communities: 17 Giant Panda Nature Reserves in China As Examples

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurately assessing the impact of the establishment of nature reserves (NRs) on rural households' livelihood vulnerability is of great practical significance for improving their livelihoods in NRs and realizing the coordinated development of conservation and economy. This study examines the effects of nature reserves establishment on the livelihood vulnerability of 380 rural households across 17 giant panda reserves in Shaanxi and Sichuan provinces, utilizing 2-year panel data. Employing the propensity score matching method and panel seemingly unrelated regression model, the research reveals several key findings. First, the establishment of NRs will aggravate rural households’ livelihood risk, weaken rural households’ adaptability, and hence increase rural households' livelihood vulnerability. Second, rural households living in provincial NRs and those within Shaanxi province face greater livelihood vulnerability, especially if the NR is located in the city with lower GDP. Third, community development projects in NRs contribute to reducing rural households’ livelihood vulnerability, among which ecotourism and skills training play a more significant role. According to the above conclusions, establishing robust ecological compensation mechanisms can help to give full play to the geographical advantages of NRs, while the development of eco-agriculture and eco-tourism helps to promote the diversification of rural households’ livelihoods, thereby improving their adaptive capacity and reducing their livelihood vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There are 46 giant panda nature reserves in Sichuan Province and 16 giant panda nature reserves in Shaanxi Province. According to the 25% sampling standard, 12 reserves in Sichuan Province and 4 reserves in Shaanxi Province need to be sampled for research. Since each reserve needs to investigate four villages, and only two villages are involved around Huangbaiyuan nature reserve, hence Niuweihe nature reserve was added to the study as a supplement. Niuweihe nature reserve is adjacent to Huangbaiyuan nature reserve and has belonged to the same nature reserve in history. Therefore, the natural resource endowment and policy constraints of rural households are similar.

References

  • Bauer T, de Jong W, Ingram V, Arts B, Pacheco P (2022) Thriving in turbulent times: livelihood resilience and vulnerability assessment of Bolivian Indigenous forest households. Land Use Policy 119:106146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonet-García FJ, Pérez-Luque AJ, Moreno-Llorca RA, Pérez-Pérez R, Puerta-Piñero C, Zamora R (2015) Protected areas as elicitors of human well-being in a developed region: a new synthetic (socio-economic) approach. Biol Cons 187:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonye SZ, Yiridomoh GY, Nsiah V (2023) Our forest, our livelihood: natural resources’ use controversies and community livelihood sustainability in the Mole National Park. Ghana Land Use Policy 127:106589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caro-Borrero A, Carmona-Jiménez J, Figueroa F (2020) Water resources conservation and rural livelihoods in protected areas of Central Mexico. J Rural Stud 78:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen F, Yan JZ, Li HL (2017) The division of livelihood strategies based on farmers’ livelihood activities—a typical area in Chongqing as an example. J Southwest Univ (Natural Science Edition) 39:113–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen WM, Zhang LZ, Li CG (2023) Research on the risk measurement and early warning mechanism construction of rural poverty alleviation families—an analytical framework based on livelihood vulnerability. J Guizhou Univ Finan Econ 223:73–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AT, Sims KR, Yi Y (2023) Economic development and conservation impacts of China’s nature reserves. J Environ Econ Manag 121:102848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das M, Das A, Momin S, Pandey R (2020) Mapping the effect of climate change on community livelihood vulnerability in the riparian region of Gangatic Plain. India Ecol Indicators 119:106815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pourcq K, Thomas E, Arts B, Vranckx A, Léon-Sicard T, Van Damme P (2017) Understanding and resolving conflict between local communities and conservation authorities in Colombia. World Dev 93:125–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding WQ, Li P, Yin YT, Hou XY (2017) Research on the vulnerability assessment of herdsmen in northern China’s grasslands from the perspective of sustainable livelihoods. J Grass Industry 26:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan W (2016) Research on the coordinated development of biodiversity conservation and farmers' livelihood in protected areas. Beijing Forestry University.

  • Duan W, Ouyang B (2020) The impact of nature reserves on the multi-dimensional poverty of surrounding farmers—Analysis of the mediating effect based on social capital. Resource Science 42:1074–1086

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan W, Wen Y (2017) Impacts of protected areas on local livelihoods: evidence of giant panda biosphere reserves in Sichuan Province. China Land Use Policy 68:168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan W, Zhao Z, Ma B, Wen YL (2015b) Perceived analysis of the benefits and losses of ecological protection by farmers around the reserve. Resource Sci 37:2471–2479

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan W, Li BJ, Su N, Ma Li (2021) Do nature reserves aggravate the livelihood risks of farmers in surrounding communities? Taking 17 giant panda nature reserves in Sichuan and Shaanxi as examples. For Econ 43:58–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan W, Ren YM, Feng J, Wen YL (2015) A study on farmers' dependence on natural resources based on livelihood capital—a case study of protected areas in Hubei Province. Issues Agric Econ 36:74–82+112.

  • Estifanos TK, Polyakov M, Pandit R, Hailu A, Burton M (2020) The impact of protected areas on the rural households’ incomes in Ethiopia. Land Use Policy 91:104349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO, UNEP (2020) The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, Biodiversity and People; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en. Accessed on 27 September 2020

  • Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM (2015) Through what mechanisms do protected areas affect environmental and social outcomes? Philos Trans Roy Soc B Biol Sci 370:20140267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastineau P, Mossay P, Taugourdeau E (2021) Ecological compensation: how much and where? Ecol Econ 190:107191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu N, Liu Y (2021) Does industrial poverty alleviation reduce poverty vulnerability of poor households? J Agrotech Econ 315:92–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK, Negi M, Nandy S, Kumar M, Singh V, Valente D, Petrosillo I, Pandey R (2020) Mapping socio-environmental vulnerability to climate change in different altitude zones in the Indian Himalayas. Ecol Ind 109:105787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn MB, Riederer AM, Foster SO (2009) The Livelihood Vulnerability Index: a pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—a case study in Mozambique. Glob Environ Chang 19:74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He YY, Zhou CC (2020) Vulnerability assessment of farmers’ livelihood in poverty-stricken areas and analysis of influencing factors. Stat Decis 36:70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi SJ, Sharifi A, Arvin M (2022) Assessment of social vulnerability in areas exposed to multiple hazards: a case study of the Khuzestan Province. Iran Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 78:103127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoq MS, Raha SK, Hossain MI (2021) Livelihood vulnerability to flood hazard: understanding from the flood-prone Haor Ecosystem of Bangladesh. Environ Manage 67:532–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque MZ, Haque ME, Islam MS (2022) Mapping integrated vulnerability of coastal agricultural livelihood to climate change in Bangladesh: implications for spatial adaptation planning. Phys Chem Earth a/b/c 125:103080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huong NTL, Yao S, Fahad S (2019) Assessing household livelihood vulnerability to climate change: the case of Northwest Vietnam. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 25:1157–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain J, Zhou K, Akbar M, Zafar Khan M, Raza G, Ali S, Hussain A, Abbas Q, Khan G, Khan M, Abbas H, Iqbal S, Ghulam A (2019) Dependence of rural livelihoods on forest resources in Naltar Valley, a dry temperate mountainous region. Pakistan Glob Ecol Conserv 20:e00765

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2014. Climate change 2014—impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Regional aspects. Cambridge University Press.

  • Johnson M, Karanth K, Weinthal E (2018) Compensation as a policy for mitigating human-wildlife conflict around four protected areas in Rajasthan. India Conserv Soc 16:305–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KK, Kudalkar S (2017) History, location, and species matter: insights for human–wildlife conflict mitigation from India. Hum Dimens Wildl 22:331–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khosla S, Jena PR, Rahut DB (2023) Can rural livelihood programs enhance capabilities and reduce vulnerability to poverty? Evidence from a tribal region of eastern India. Econ Anal Policy 77:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Mishra AK, Pramanik S, Mamidanna S, Whitbread A (2020) Climate risk, vulnerability and resilience: supporting livelihood of smallholders in semiarid India. Land Use Policy 97:104729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Zou X, Chen J, Pan T (2022) Impacts of protected areas establishment on pastoralists’ livelihoods in the Three-River-Source Region on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Land Use Policy 115:106018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Lü Y, Zhao M, Fu B (2023) Integrative analysis of biodiversity, ecosystem services, and ecological vulnerability can facilitate improved spatial representation of nature reserves. Sci Total Environ 879:163096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Wang X, Wang Z, Cheng Y (2024) Does digitalization mitigate regional inequalities? Evid China Geogr Sustain 5(1):52–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma B, Zhao Z, Ding H, Wen Y (2018) Household costs and benefits of biodiversity conservation: case study of Sichuan giant panda reserves in China. Environ Dev Sustain 20:1665–1686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma B, Cai Z, Zheng J, Wen Y (2019) Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality—a case study of nature reserves in Qinling. China World Dev 115:236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma B, Zhang Y, Hou Y, Wen Y (2020) Do protected areas matter? A systematic review of the social and ecological impacts of the establishment of protected areas. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:7259

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Masud MM, Kari F, Yahaya SRB, Al-Amin AQ (2016) Livelihood assets and vulnerability context of marine park community development in Malaysia. Soc Indic Res 125:771–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbanze AA, da Silva CV, Ribeiro NS, Silva JF, Santos JL (2020) A livelihood and farming system approach for effective conservation policies in protected areas of developing countries: the case study of the Niassa National Reserve in Mozambique. Land Use Policy 99:105056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng J, Long Y, Lefeng S (2022) Stakeholders’ evolutionary relationship analysis of China’s national park ecotourism development. J Environ Manage 316:115188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China: State of China’s ecology and Environment Bulletin 2019, 2020.

  • Nguyen TA, Nguyen BT, Van Ta H, Nguyen NTP, Hoang HT, Nguyen QP, Hens L (2021) Livelihood vulnerability to climate change in the mountains of Northern Vietnam: comparing the Hmong and the Dzao ethnic minority populations. Environ Dev Sustain, pp 1–21.

  • Oldekop JA, Holmes G, Harris WE, Evans KL (2016) A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conserv Biol 30:133–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul A, Deka J, Gujre N, Rangan L, Mitra S (2019) Does nature of livelihood regulate the urban community’s vulnerability to climate change? Guwahati city, a case study from North East India. J Environ Manage 251:109591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shasha ZT, Geng Y, Sun HP, Musakwa W, Sun L (2020) Past, current, and future perspectives on ecotourism: a bibliometric review between 2001 and 2018. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:23514–23528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi HT, Zhao YF, Wu HX (2019) Research on the influence of social capital on multidimensional poverty—Micro-survey data from 513 farmer households in Yan’an City. Shaanxi Province Agric Technol Econ 285:86–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyamsundar P, Sauls LA, Cheek JZ, Sullivan-Wiley K, Erbaugh JT, Krishnapriya PP (2021) Global forces of change: Implications for forest-poverty dynamics. Forest Policy Econ 133:102607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tafida AA, Tukur AL, Adebayo EF, Ndaghu AA, Onu JI, Momodu JA (2023) Boko Haram insurgency and livelihood vulnerability of rural households in Northern Adamawa State. Nigeria Res Globalization 6:100116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang XP (2012) Classification management pattern of nature reserves and its effectiveness. J Beijing For Univ (Social Sciences) 11:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Thondhlana G, Cundill G (2017) Local people and conservation officials’ perceptions on relationships and conflicts in South African protected areas. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 13(1):204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Q, Lemos MC (2018) Household livelihood differentiation and vulnerability to climate hazards in rural China. World Dev 108:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiong KY, Ma Z, Palmqvist CW (2023) Analyzing factors contributing to real-time train arrival delays using seemingly unrelated regression models. Transp Res A Policy Pract 174:103751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tora TT, Degaga DT, Utallo AU (2022) Vulnerability management practices for sustainable livelihood security in drought-prone Gamo lowlands: an empirical insight from southwest Ethiopia. Heliyon 8:e12055

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vo TAN, Tran TK (2022) Climate change and rural vulnerability in Vietnam: an analysis of livelihood vulnerability index. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 28:326–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walelign SZ, Jiao X, Smith-Hall C (2020) Environmental reliance traps and pathways-theory and analysis of empirical data from rural Nepal. Front For Global Change 71:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CH, Liu XB (2021) Nature conservation, environmental income and farmers' livelihood improvement. Shanghai Econ Res 4:28–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang CH, Xie Y (2022) Environmental income, farmers’ well-being and protection behavior. Shanghai Econ Res 402:77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei F, Wang S, Fu B, Zhang L, Fu C, Kanga EM (2018) Balancing community livelihoods and biodiversity conservation of protected areas in East Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 33:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZL, Cao H, Jin M (2022) Influence mechanism of wetland conservation on the livelihood outcomes of farmers’: an empirical study based on the survey of rural households in natural reserves. J Ecol Rural Environ, pp 1673–4831

  • Wu YL, Yu YY (2022) Impact of rural residential land transfer on rural households’ livelihood vulnerability: base on household survey in Jinzhai. Yicheng Yujiang 21:207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Hou KL, Zheng SR, Zhang K, Yang TH, Zhao DD, Sun B, Chen L (2020) Relationship between farmer’s well-being and ecosystem services in Hilly and Mountainous Areas of South China based on structural equation model: a case study of Lechang in Guangdong Province. Trop Geogr 40:843–855

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu WH, Xiao Y, Zhang JJ, Yang W, Zhang L, Hull V, Wang Z, Zheng H, Liu JG, Polasky S, Jiang L, Xiao Y, Shi XW, Rao EM, Lu F, Wang XK, Daily GC, Ouyang ZY (2017) Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:1601–1606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Šarić Ž, Zhu F, Babić D (2018) Accident severity levels and traffic signs interactions in state roads: a seemingly unrelated regression model in unbalanced panel data approach. Accid Anal Prev 120:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Lupi F, Zhang J, Chen X, Liu J (2018) Feedback of telecoupling: the case of a payments for ecosystem services program. Ecol Soc 23:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Li Q, Xue W, Xu Z (2022) Impacts of nature reserves on local residents’ income in China. Ecol Econ 199:107494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yergeau ME, Boccanfuso D, Goyette J (2017) Linking conservation and welfare: a theoretical model with application to Nepal. J Environ Econ Manag 86:229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu P, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang C, Zhang H (2020) Can tourism development enhance livelihood capitals of rural households? Evidence from Huangshan National Park adjacent communities. China Sci Total Environ 748:141099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Zhao X, Tang H (2019) Vulnerability of communities to climate change: application of the livelihood vulnerability index to an environmentally sensitive region of China. Clim Dev 11:525–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Xue HL, Lan X, Dai LW, Wang BJ, Cui FQ, Tang HP (2022) Livelihood vulnerability of pastoral households in the semiarid grasslands of northern China: measurement and determinants. Ecol Ind 140:109020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Li X, Yu Y (2023a) Relationship between ecosystem services and farmers’ well-being in the Yellow River Wetland Nature Reserve of China. Ecol Ind 146:109810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Torre A, Ehrlich M (2023b) The impact of Chinese government promoted homestead transfer on labor migration and household’s well-being: a study in three rural areas. J Asian Econ 86:101616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z, Li T, Wen YL (2016) Analysis of the protection cost and benefit of farmers in the surrounding communities of nature reserves. J Agric For Econ Manage 15:717–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XY, Mu FF, He XF, Su HZ, Jie YQ, Lan HX, Xue B (2020) Livelihood vulnerability of farmers in key ecological function area under multiple stressors: Taking the Yellow River water supply area of Gannan as an example. Acta Ecol Sin 40:7479–7492

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Lu CC, Shi JL, Zhang LR, Pan Z (2019) The diachronic nature of the well-being of residents in nature reserves: a case study of Foping National Nature Reserve in Shaanxi. J Ecol 39:8299–8309

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the National Nature Science Foundation of China-Major International (Regional) Joint Research Project (71761147003) and the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education, China (22YJA790014) supported this study. Any remaining errors are solely our own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, 510642, China

    Wei Duan, Pan Zhang, Ruidi Zhu, Bingjie Li, Yongjun Zhang & Yijing Zhang

Authors
  1. Wei Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruidi Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bingjie Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yongjun Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yijing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yijing Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, W., Zhang, P., Zhu, R. et al. Impact of Nature Reserves on the Rural Household's Livelihood Vulnerability In Surrounding Communities: 17 Giant Panda Nature Reserves in China As Examples. Small-scale Forestry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-024-09570-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-024-09570-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation