Skip to main content
Log in

Noise Exposures and Hearing Protector Use at Small Logging Operations

  • Short paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study objective was to characterize noise exposures and hearing protector usage at small-scale logging operations. Noise dosimeters were used to measure exposures of 31 loggers at two cable operations and five mechanized operations in the United States. Activity cards were employed to evaluate hearing protector usage. Ninety-two percent of cable operation loggers were overexposed to noise according to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommended criteria, but only 46% of cable loggers wore hearing protection. Six percent of mechanized operation loggers were overexposed to noise over the 8-h shifts observed, but this number increased to 33% when working 12-h shifts, which was a common practice among the participant companies. Only 6% of mechanized loggers wore hearing protection. Mean noise exposures and the proportion of hearing protection usage were both significantly greater at cable operations than at mechanized operations. None of the logging operations had hearing conservation programs in place. Despite the use of mechanized logging equipment and methods, the potential for noise-induced hearing loss remains a concern for workers employed at small-scale operations in the logging industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abizu-Urionabarrenetxea P, Tolosana-Esteban E, Roman-Jordan E (2013) Safety and health in forest harvesting operations. Diagnosis and preventive actions. A review. For Syst 22(3):392–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelsson S-A (1998) The mechanization of logging operations in Sweden and its effect on occupational safety and health. J For Eng 9(2):25–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniell WE, Fulton-Kehoe D, Smith-Weller T, Franklin GM (1998) Occupational hearing loss in Washington state, 1984–1991: I. statewide and industry-specific incidence. Am J Ind Med 33(6):519–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin SC, Neitzel R, Daniell WE, Seixas NS (2009) Indicators of hearing protection use: self-report and researcher observation. J Occup Environ Hyg 6(10):639–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lefort AJ Jr, De Hoop CF, Pine JC, Marx BD (2003) Characteristics of injuries in the logging industry of Louisiana, USA: 1986 to 1998. Int J For Eng 14(2):75–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Masterson EA, Tak S, Themann CL, Wall DK, Groenewold MR, Deddens JA, Calvert GM (2013) Prevalence of hearing loss in the United States by industry. Am J Ind Med 56(6):670–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterson EA, Deddens JA, Themann CL, Bertke S, Calvert GM (2015) Trends in worker hearing loss by industry sector, 1981–2010. Am J Ind Med 58(4):392–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyakita T, Miura H, Futatsuka H (1987) Noise-induced hearing loss in relation to vibration-induced white finger in chain-saw workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 13:32–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neitzel R, Yost M (2002) Task-based assessment of occupational vibration and noise exposures in forestry workers. AIHA J 63(5):617–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preneuf F (2016) Forests generate jobs and incomes. The World Bank. Accessed April 27 at www.worldbank.org

  • Seixas F, Barbosa RA, Rummer R (1999) Noise level determination in forestry machines. Forestry Engineering for Tomorrow, Machinery Technical Papers, Edinburgh, Scottland, June 28–30, 1999

  • Shaffer RM, Milburn JS (1999) Injuries of Feller-Buncher/Grapple skidder logging operations in the southeastern United States. For Prod J 49(7):24–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriwattanatamma P, Breysse P (2000) Comparison of NIOSH noise criteria and OSHA hearing conservation criteria. Am J Ind Med 37(4):334–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tunay M, Melemez K (2008) Noise induced hearing loss of forest workers in Turkey. Pak J Biol Sci 11(17):2144–2148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the loggers and logging companies who participated in this study. The authors would also like to thank Bryan Lorengo for his assistance with scheduling and transport to the logging sites. Student scholarship support for the lead author of this project was provided by a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Training Project Grant (Grant No. TOH008630). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent official views of any funding organization or agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel A. Autenrieth.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLain, S.C., Autenrieth, D.A., Yang, X. et al. Noise Exposures and Hearing Protector Use at Small Logging Operations. Small-scale Forestry 20, 1–9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09459-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09459-0

Keywords

Navigation