Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Managing the Forest Landscape: Exploring the Quantitative Interplay Between Forestland Patches, Areas and Landowner Numbers in Counties from Alabama, USA

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forestlands provide timber resources and valuable ecosystem services. To better manage forest landscape and develop policies, it is important to quantify the relationships between the number of forestland patches, patch areas, and landowner numbers. By using integrated analysis of information about the forestlands in 17 counties in Alabama, USA, similar scaling relationships are determined in the forestland patch quantity, areas, and owner numbers across various patch-size classes. Forestlands on individual properties of up to 50 acres cover about 59% of patch number and 21% of total area, encompassing 77% of landowner numbers. In Alabama, few private landowners have more than 500 acres of forestland. Similar relationships between different sizes of forestlands and the accumulated percentages of patch quantity, areas, and landowner numbers exist. These distribution relationships can be described by quadratic and power functions. A significant correlation exists between forestland prices and the exponents of these scaling relationships in forest patch numbers, total areas, and landowner numbers across counties. These results provide a new understanding of the distribution of forestland in Alabama. The implication is that an economic approach (e.g., adjusting forestland prices or taxes) may help to better manage the remaining forest landscape and develop conservation policy in this region that could be used to reduce forest fragmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alig RJ (1986) Econometric analysis of the factors influencing forest acreage trends in the Southeast. For Sci 32:119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Alig RJ, Lee KJ, Moulton RJ (1990) Likelihood of timber management on nonindustrial private forests: evidence from research studies. General Technical Report SE-60, USDA Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC

  • Bar-Yam Y (2011) Concepts: power law. New England Complex Systems Institute. https://necsi.edu/power-law. Accessed 5 July 2020

  • Best C (2002) America’s private forests challenges for conservation. J For 100:14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Catanzaro PF, Greene JL, Hewes JH, Kilgore MA, Kittredge DB, Ma Z, Tyrrell ML (2012) Taxing family forest owners: implications of federal and state policies in the United States. J For 110:371–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Butsic V, Syphard AD, Keeley JE, Bar-Massada A (2017) Can private land conservation reduce wildfire risk to homes? A case study in San Diego County, California, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 157:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceddia MG (2019) The impact of income, land, and wealth inequality on agricultural expansion in Latin America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:2527–2532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2007) Spatial pattern of wildfire occurrences in Alabama, USA. Int J Environ Stud 64:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2010) Trends of forest inventory data in Alabama, USA during the last seven decades. Forestry 83:517–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2016) A case study of using remote sensing data to compare biophysical properties of a forest and an urban area in northern Alabama, USA. J Sustain For 35:261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2017) Will more tree diversity bring back more income from timber? A case study from Alabama of USA. For Lett 110:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2018) Diverse scaling relationships of tree height and diameter in five tree species. Plant Ecol Divers 11:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X (2019) Dynamics of forest composition and growth in Alabama of USA under human activities and climate fluctuation. J Sustain For 38:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Fraser R (2009) Quantifying impacts of land ownership on regional forest NDVI dynamics: a case study at Bankhead National Forest of Alabama, USA. Photogr Eng Remote Sens 75:997–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Li B-L, Allen FM (2010) Characterizing urbanization, conservation and agricultural land use change in Riverside County, California, USA. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1195:E164–E176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Guo Q, Brockway DG (2017) Power laws in cone production of longleaf pine across its native range in the United States. Sust Agric Res 4:64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutter M, Mendell B, Newman D, Wear D, Greis J (2005) Strategic factors driving timberland ownership changes in the U.S. South. Warnell School of Forest Resource, University of Georgia, Athen, GA

  • Fraser RF, Gyawali BR, Schelhas J (2005) Blacks in space: land tenure and well-being in Perry County, Alabama. Small Scale For Econ Manag Policy 4:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan J, Kolison SH Jr, Tackie NO (2003) African-American forestland owners in Alabama’s Black Belt. J For 4(5):38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzluff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Gude PHKJ (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol Appl 15:1893–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore MA, Snyder SA, Block-Torgerson K, Taff SJ (2013) Challenges in characterizing a parcelized forest landscape: why metric, scale, threshold, and definitions matter. Landsc Urban Plan 110:36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPierre S, Germain RH (2005) Forestland parcelization in the New York City watershed. J For 103:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy M, Solomon S (1997) New evidence for the power-law distribution of wealth. Physica A 242:90–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Huang C, Zhu Z, Shi H, Lu H, Peng S (2009) Assessing rates of forest change and fragmentation in Alabama, USA, using the vegetation change tracker model. For Ecol Manag 257:1480–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquet PA, Quiñones RA, Abades S, Labra F, Tognelli M, Arim M, Rivadeneira M (2005) Scaling and power-laws in ecological systems. J Exp Biol 208:1749–1769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcnabb K, Bliss JC (1994) Nonindustrial private forest owner attitude toward the use of silvicultural herbicides. J Natl Res Life Sci Edu 23:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystem and human well-being, vol 2. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal P, Butler BJ, Kittredge DB, Moser WK (2013) How are America’s private forests changing? An integrated assessment of forest management, housing pressure, and urban development in alternate emissions scenarios. Land Use Policy 32:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Zhang Y, Butler BJ (2007) Trends among family forest owners in Alabama, 1994–2004. South J Appl For 31:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Zhang Y, Majumdar I (2009) Population, economic welfare and holding size distribution of private forestland in Alabama, USA. Silva Fenn 43:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips D (2006) Discovering Alabama forests. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa

    Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal NC, Joshi O, Hodges DG, Hoyt K (2014) Factors related with nonindustrial private forest landowners’ forest conversion decision in Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee. For Sci 60:988–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal NC, Butler BJ, Hodges DG (2019) Spatial analysis of family forest land ownership in the southern United States. Landsc Urban Plan 188:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg KV, Raphael MG (1986) Effects of forest fragmentation on vertebrates in Douglas-fir forests. In: Verner J, Marrison ML, Ralph CJ (eds) Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravia LA, Doyle SR, Bond-Lamberty B (2018) Power-laws and critical fragmentation in global forests. Sci Rep 8:17766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spurlock SP, Adrian JL (1978) Variations in rural land values in the wiregrass region of Alabama. Bulletin 504, Agricultural Experiment Station/Auburn University, Auburn, AL

  • Stanfield BJ, Bliss JC, Spies TA (2002) Land ownership and landscape structure: a spatial analysis of sixty-six Oregon (USA) Coast Range watersheds. Landsc Ecol 17:685–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland IJ, Bennett EM, Gergel SE (2016) Recovery trends for multiple ecosystem services reveal non-linear responses and long-term tradeoffs from temperate forest harvesting. For Ecol Manag 374:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wear DN, Turner MG, Flamm RO (1996) Ecosystem management with multiple owners: landscape dynamics in a southern Appalachian watershed. Ecol Appl 6:1173–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintle BA, Kujala H, Whitehead A, Cameron A, Veloz S, Kukkala A, Moilanen A, Gordon A, Lentini PE, Cadenhead NCR, Bekessy SA (2019) Global synthesis of conservation studies reveal the importance of small habitat patches for biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:909–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Warren S, Bailey C (1998) The role of assistance foresters in nonindustrial private forest management: Alabama landowners’ perspectives. South J Appl For 22:101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Liao X, Butler BJ, Schelhas J (2009) The increasing importance of small scale forestry: evidence from family forest ownership patterns in the United States. Small-Scale For 8:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to anonymous reviewers, Dr. William Stone, and Dr. S. Harrison (associate editor) for helpful suggestions and comments. This study was partially supported by the USDA Mc-Stennis program (1008643).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Alabama A&M University, Normal, AL, 35762, USA

    Xiongwen Chen

Authors
  1. Xiongwen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiongwen Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X. Managing the Forest Landscape: Exploring the Quantitative Interplay Between Forestland Patches, Areas and Landowner Numbers in Counties from Alabama, USA. Small-scale Forestry 19, 505–520 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09451-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09451-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation