Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Plant Species Conservation Priority Index for Preparing Management Strategies: A Case Study from the Western Himalayas of India

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human activities coupled with over exploitation of sensitive ecosystems and habitat destruction have caused a rapid decrease in the population of plant species. Countries worldwide are becoming interested in conserving biodiversity by determining conservation priorities at local levels. The categories used for evaluating threat status by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) that were originally planned for the global level are now increasingly used at national and local levels. The present study deals with the assessment of vegetation and further prioritization of habitats, communities, and species for its conservation in the Shimla water catchment Sanctuary in the Western Himalayas of India. Adoption of such methods not only generates quantitative data about the floristic diversity of the area but also help policy makers and forest managers in the formulation of conservation strategies for proper management of protected areas. A conservation priority index (CPI) was used to prioritize based on various attributes that are complementary to IUCN criteria. Among the tree communities, Cedrus deodara-Quercus leucotrichophora, Picea smithiana, and Quercus leucotricophora-Quercus floribunda communities showed maximum CPIs scores (54 each) followed by the Quercus semecarpifolia (52), Abies pindrow-Taxus baccata, Aesculus indica (46 each), and Cedrus deodara-Pinus wallichiana (i.e. 44 each) communities. The remaining tree communities showed relatively low CPI values. Among shrub communities, the Berberis lycium-Indigofera heterantha-Cotoneaster microphyllus community showed highest CPI score (42), hence should be prioritized for conservation. The remaining shrub communities showed comparatively low CPI values. Among the habitats—dry habitats showed highest CPI score (48), followed by shady moist and water courses (46 each) and exposed (44) habitats. Among the identified species, 10 were identified as critically endangered, 31 as endangered, 48 as vulnerable and 30 species as near threatened and were accordingly prioritized for conservation. The present study emphasizes on community, habitat and species specific management of this forest ecosystem for effective management by the forest managers and policy makers. Regular monitoring of prioritized habitats and communities is suggested while management and restoration of habitats and communities with low CPI values. People’s participation, training, and interactive workshops are essential in order to minimize structural and functional alterations due to overexploitation and habitat degradation. Forest fires and invasion by non-native species are other issues to monitor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeli T, Gentili R, Rossi G, Bedini G, Foggi B (2009) Can the IUCN criteria be effectively applied to peripheral isolated plant populations? Biodivers Conserv 18:3877–3890

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen CR, Cumming GS, Garmestani A, Taylor PD, Walker BH (2011) Managing for resilience. Wildl Biol 17:337–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchetta G, Farris E, Pontecorvo C (2012) A new method to set conservation priorities in biodiversity hotspots. Plant Biosyst 146(3):638–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P (2008) Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For Ecol Manag 254:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels SF, Chen H (2010) Is understory plant species diversity driven by resource quantity or resource heterogeneity? Ecology 91:1931–1938

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, Mittermeier CG, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL (2006) Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313:58–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Calder I, Hofer T, Vermont S, Warren P (2007) Towards a new understanding of forests and water. Unasylva 58 2007/4 ISSN 0041-6436 FAO

  • Champion SH, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types of India. Govt. of India press, New Delhi

  • Chavez V, Macdonald SE (2010) The influence of canopy patch mosaics on understory plant community composition in boreal mixed wood forest. For Ecol Manag 259:1067–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez V, Macdonald SE (2012) Partitioning vascular understory diversity in mixed wood boreal forests: the importance of mixed canopies for diversity conservation. For Ecol Manag 271:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla A, Rajkumar S, Singh KN, Lal B, Singh RD (2008) Plant species diversity along an altitudinal gradient of Bhabha valley in Western Himalaya. J Mt Sci 5:157–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett H (1902) Flora simlensis. Thacker Spink. and Co. Calcutta and Shimla, Reprinted 1971. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2004) Decision VII/30. Strategic plan: future evaluation of progress. UNEP, Kuala Lumpur

  • Cumming GS, Morrison TH, Hughes TP (2017) New directions for understanding the spatial resilience of social-ecological systems. Ecosystems 20(4):649–664

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lucena RFP, Lucena C, Araujo EL, Alves AGC, De Albuquerque UP (2013) Conservation priorities of useful plants from different techniques of collection and analysis of ethnobotanical data. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 85(1):169–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar U, Rawal RS, Upreti J (2000) Setting priorities for conservation of medicinal plants—a case study in the Indian Himalaya. Biol Conserv 95:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguma LA, Hager H (2010) Woody plants diversity and possession, and their future prospects in small-scale tree and shrub growing in agricultural landscapes in central highlands of Ethiopia. Small Scale For 9:153–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-009-9108-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn EH, Hussell DJT, Welsh DA (1999) Priority-setting tool applied to Canada’s land birds based on concern and responsibility of species. Conserv Biol 13:1404–1415

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CJ, Raxworthy CJ, Metcalfe K, Raselimanana AP, Smith RJ, Davies ZG (2015) Comparing methods for prioritizing protected areas for investment: a case study using Madagascar's dry forest reptiles. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0132803

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Pressey RL, Margules CR (2002) Persistence and vulnerability: retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas. J Biosci 27(Suppl. 2):361–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier P, Debussche M, Thompson JD (2010) Regional priority setting for rare species based on a method combining three criteria. Biol Conserv 143:1501–1509

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves CR (2003) Drafting a conservation blueprint: a practitioner’s guide to planning for biodiversity. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq F, Rahman F, Tabassum I, Ullah I, Sher A (2018) Forest dilemma in the Hindu Raj Mountains Northern Pakistan: impact of population growth and household dynamics. Small Scale For 17:323–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9390-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart SA, Chen H (2008) Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in the boreal forest. Ecol Monogr 78:123–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VH, Iriondo JM (2003) Plant conservation: old problems, new perspectives. Biol Conserv 113:321–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood VH, Watson RT (1995) Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins M, Schaap B (2018) Background analytical study—forest ecosystem services. Background study prepared for the thirteenth session of the United Nations Forum on Forests, p 5

  • Jordan WR III (1988) Ecological restoration: reflections of a half-century of experience at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Arboretum. In: Wilson EO, Peter FM (eds) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 311–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP (2000) Status and conservation of rare and endangered medicinal plants in the Indian Trans Himalaya. Biol Conserv 93:371–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP (2005) Indigenous uses, population density, and conservation of threatened medicinal plants in the protected areas of the Indian Himalayas. Conserv Biol 19(2):368–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller V, Bollmann K (2004) From red lists to species of conservation concern. Conserv Biol 18:1636–1644

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan SM, Page S, Ahmad H, Harper D (2014) Ethno-ecological importance of plant biodiversity in mountain ecosystems with special emphasis on indicator species of a Himalayan Valley in the northern Pakistan. Ecol Ind 37:175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Korner C (2004) Mountain biodiversity, its causes and functions. Ambio 13:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal M (2007) Assessment of floristic diversity and conservation status of plants in Kais Wildlife Sanctuary of Himachal Pradesh in North-western Himalaya. Ph.D. Thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, p 208

  • Lieffers VJ, Armstrong GW, Stadt KJ, Marenholtz EH (2008) Forest regeneration standards: are they limiting management options for Alberta’s boreal mixed woods? For Chron 84:76–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald SE, Fenniak TE (2007) Understory plant communities of boreal mixed wood forests in western Canada: natural patterns and response to variable-retention harvesting. For Ecol Manag 242:34–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez GJ, Planchuelo AM, Fuentes E, Ojeda M (2006) A numeric index to establish conservation priorities for medicinal plants in the Paravachasca Valley, Co' rdoba, Argentina. Biodivers Conserv 15:2457–2475

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur VB, Kathayat JS, Rath DP (2000) Wildlife and protected areas, vol 3. ENVIS bull, wildlife institute of India, Dehradun

  • McNeely JA, Miller KR, Reid WV, Mittermeier RA, Werner TB (1990) Conserving the world's biological diversity. IUCN, WRI, CI, WWF-US, and the World Bank, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RM, Rodríguez JP, Aniskowicz-Fowler T, Bambaradeniya C, Boles R, Eaton MA, Gardenfors ULF, Keller V, Molur S, Walker S, Pollock C (2007) National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines: current status and future perspectives. Conserv Biol 21:684–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra KC (1991) Manual of plant ecology. Oxford and IBH Publishing, Oxford, p 508

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Gil PL, Hoffman M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, Fonseca GABD (2004) Hotspots revisited: earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial eco-regions, conservation international, Washington

  • Myers N, Mittermeir RA, Mittermeir CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1992) Conserving biodiversity: a research agenda for development agencies. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/1925

  • Nigel D, Sue S (2003) Running pure: the importance of forest protected areas to drinking water. A research report for the World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use. ISBN 2-88085-262-5. World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use

  • Pant S, Samant SS (2007) Assessment of plant diversity and prioritization of communities for conservation in Mornaula Reserve Forest. Appl Ecol Environ Res 5(2):151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Polunin O, Stainton A (1984) Flowers of the Himalaya. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, p 580

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MS (2007) Assessment of floristic diversity and conservation prioritization of communities for conservation in Manali Wildlife Sanctuary of Himachal Pradesh in North-western Himalaya. Ph.D thesis, Kumaun University, Nainital, p 228

  • Rana D, Kapoor KS (2015) Assessment of floristic diversity of Shimla water catchment Sanctuary, Himachal Pradesh. India Indian Forester 141(12):1244–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana D, Masoodi H (2014) Ethno-botanical survey for wild plants in fringe villages around Shimla water catchment Sanctuary, Himachal Pradesh, India. J Appl Nat Sci 6(2):720–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MS, Samant SS (2009) Prioritization of habitats and communities for conservation in the Indian Himalayan Region: a state-of-the-art approach from Manali Wildlife Sanctuary. Curr Sci 97(3):326–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana MS, Samant SS (2010) Threat categorization and conservation of floristic diversity in the Indian Himalayan region: a state of art approach from Manali Wildlife Sanctuary. J Nat Conserv 18:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana D, Kapoor KS, Singh VRR (2013) Hydrological and Ecological studies towards integrated water resource management: a case study of Shimla water catchment Sanctuary, Himachal Pradesh. Asia Pacific workshop on forest hydrology—water and forests: beyond traditional forest hydrology

  • Rawat GS, Singh SK (2006) Structure and composition of woody vegetation along the altitudinal and human use gradients in Great Himalayan National Park, North-western Himalaya. Proc Nat Acad Sci Ind 76(B):194–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts L (1991) Ranking the rain forest. Science 251:1559–1560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LD, Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffman M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JF, Hoffman M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Samant SS, Dhar U, Palni LMS (1998) Medicinal plants of Indian Himalaya: diversity distribution potential values. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital

    Google Scholar 

  • Samant SS, Joshi HC, Arya SC, Pant S (2002) Studies on the structure, composition, and changes of vegetation in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve of west Himalaya. Final Technical Report, Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi

  • Samant SS, Jitendra SB, Sharma A (2007) Assessment of diversity, distribution, conservation status and preparation of management plan for medicinal plants in the catchment area of Parbati Hydroelectric Project Stage-III in Northwestern Himalaya. J Mt Sci 4(1):34–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Samant SS, Singh A, Sharma P, Lal M (2010) Studies on diversity and conservation status of plants in a proposed Cold Desert biosphere Reserve of Trans and North West Himalaya. Final technical report submitted to Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, New Delhi

  • Sapir Y, Shmida A, Fragman O (2003) Constructing red numbers for setting conservation priorities of endangered plant species: Israeli flora as a test case. J Nat Conserv 11:91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JM, Davis FW, McGhie RG, Wright RG, Groves C, Estes J (2001) Nature reserves: do they capture the full range of America’s biological diversity? Ecol Appl 11:999–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma L, Samant SS (2019) Prioritization of habitats and communities for conservation in Cold Desert Biosphere Reserve, Trans Himalaya, India. Ecol Res 34:509–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva NF, Hanazaki N, Albuquerque UP, Campos JLA, Feitosa IS, Araujo EL (2019) Local knowledge and conservation priorities of medicinal plants near a protected area in Brazil. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8275084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS (2002) The biodiversity crisis: a multifaceted review. Curr Sci 82(6):638–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2007) Assessment of plant diversity and conservation status of forest vegetation in a cold desert biosphere reserve of the Western Himalaya. Thesis submitted to Kumaun University Nainital

  • Singh KN, Lal B, Singh RD, Todaria NP, Ahuja PS (2007) Species richness, distribution pattern and conservation status of higher plants in the Spiti cold desert of trans-Himalaya, India. Int J Biodivers Sci Manag 3:223–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451590709618176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PGR, Therberge JB (1986) A review of criteria for evaluation natural areas. Environ Manag 10:715–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PGR, Therberge JB (1987) Evaluating natural areas using multiple criteria: theory and practice. Environ Manag 11:447–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood KK, Gupta HK (2007) Implications of Indian forester’s perspectives of joint forest mangement. Small Scale For 6:291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-007-9021-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soosairaj S, Britto JS, Balaguru B, Nagamurugan N, Natarajan D (2007) Zonation of conservation priority sites for effective management of tropical forests in India: a value-based conservation approach. Appl Ecol Environ Res 5(2):37–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza AS, Albuquerque UP, Nascimento ALB, Santro FR, Torres-Avilez WT, Lucena RFP, Monteiro JM (2017) Temporal evaluation of the conservation priority index for medicinal plants. Acta Bot Bras. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-33062017abb0027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrasón D, Urrutia JT, Ravera F, Herrera E, Andrés P, Espelta JM (2010) Conservation status of tropical dry forest remnants in Nicaragua: do ecological indicators and social perception tally? Biodivers Conserv 19:813–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprety Y, Poudel RC, Gurung J, Chettri N, Chaudhary RP (2016) Traditional use and management of NTFPs in Kangchenjunga Landscape: implications for conservation and livelihoods. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 12(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2008) Watershed forestry resource guide center for watershed protection and US forest service. https://www.forestsforwatersheds.org/2015. Accessed 30 Nov 2019

  • USDA (2013) Watershed forestry. USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC. Accessed 30 Nov 2019

  • Ved DK, Kinhal GK, Ravikumar K, Prabhakaran V, Ghate U, Sankar RV, Indresha JH (eds) (2003) Conservation and assessment management prioritization for the medicinal plants of Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and Uttaranchal. FRLHT, Bangalore, p 206

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellak A, Tuvi E, Reier U, Kalamees R, Roosaluste E, Zobel M, Ärtel PM (2009) Past and present effectiveness of protected areas for conservation of naturally and anthropogenically rare plant species. Conserv Biol 23:750–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson KA, Carwardine J, Possingham HP (2009) Setting conservation priorities. Ann NY Acad Sci 1162:237–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf M, Naaf T (2009) Herb layer response to broadleaf tree species with different leaf litter quality and canopy structure in temperate forests. J Veg Sci 20:517–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu M, Sun OJ (2013) Effects of forest patch type and site on herb-layer vegetation in a temperate forest ecosystem. For Ecol Manag 300:14–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF, Shimla) and the forest guards of SWCS are highly acknowledged for their kind cooperation during the entire period of research work. Thanks are due to the funding agency G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Almora (Uttarakhand) under Project No. GBPI/IERP/12-13/03/14. Dr. V.P Tiwari, Ex-Director, Himalayan Forest Research Institute, Shimla is highly acknowledged for providing facilities to carry out the research work. The authors also thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Himalayan Forest Research Institute, Panthaghati, Shimla, H.P., 171013, India

    Dipika Rana & Kulraj Singh Kapoor

  2. G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development, Kullu, H.P., 175126, India

    Sher Singh Samant

  3. High Altitude Biology Division, CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, H.P., 176061, India

    Dipika Rana & Anupam Bhatt

Authors
  1. Dipika Rana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kulraj Singh Kapoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sher Singh Samant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anupam Bhatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipika Rana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rana, D., Kapoor, K.S., Samant, S.S. et al. Plant Species Conservation Priority Index for Preparing Management Strategies: A Case Study from the Western Himalayas of India. Small-scale Forestry 19, 461–481 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09447-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09447-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation