Abstract
Forests play an important role in the livelihoods of ethnic communities living in the south-eastern region, the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHTs), of Bangladesh. Over decades, deforestation and land degradation have markedly affected ethnic peoples’ livelihoods in the CHTs. Although communities once managed extensive forest commons to support their livelihood needs, population explosion triggered fragmentation of common land leading to a gradual decline in livelihood opportunities. However, ethnic communities still manage the remnants of those once extensive common resources that are locally known as Village Common Forests (VCFs), which provide valuable resources for community use. An investigation was made of the role of forest income in livelihoods of selected VCF communities in Bandarban and Rangamati districts of the CHTs. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were employed to examine the household livelihood system of the respondents selected at random from 7 villages. Data were collected through participatory rural appraisal and structured quarterly surveys. The contribution of all forest-related income was found to be much smaller (11.59 %) than that of agricultural income (77.02 %) in average total household income. However, VCFs provide bamboos, which are the largest source of household forest income. Moreover, they harbour rich native tree diversity which is vital for maintaining perennial water sources upon which most household livelihood activities depend. Therefore, it seems that rejuvenation of VCFs is crucial to support sustainable community livelihood in the CHTs. A strong political will is necessary to formalize the existence of VCFs in the land-use strategies for the CHTs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADB (2001) Chittagong Hill Tracts region development plan. Asian Development Bank Technical Assistance (TA) no. 3328, consultant report (Euroconsult), Rangamati, Bangladesh
Adhikari B, Williams F, Lovett JC (2007) Local benefits from community forests in the middle hills of Nepal. For Pol Econ 9(5):464–478
Agrawal A, Cashore B, Hardin R, Shepherd G, Benson C, Miller D (2013) Economic contributions of forests. United Nations Forum on Forests background paper no. 1. http://www.un.org/esa/forests/pdf/session_documents/unff10/EcoContrForests.pdf. Accessed 1 Apr 2014
Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Borner J, Smith-hall C, Wunder S (2014) Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Dev 64 (Suppl 1):S12–S28
Babulo B, Muys B, Nega F, Tollens E, Nyssen J, Deckers J, Mathijs E (2008) Household livelihood strategies and forest dependence in the highlands of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Agric Syst 98(2):147–155
Babulo B, Muys B, Nega F, Tollens E, Nyssen J, Deckers J, Mathijs E (2009) The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. For Pol Econ 11(2):109–117
Bahuguna VK (2000) Forests in the economy of the rural poor: an estimation of the dependency level. AMBIO 29(3):126–129
Baten MA, Khan NA, Ahammad R, Misbahuzzaman K (2010) Village common forests in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh: balance between conservation and exploitation. Unnayan Onneshan—The Innovators, Dhaka
Bdnews24.com (2014) http://bdnews24.com/economy/2014/05/21/bangladesh-s-per-capita-income-1190. Bangladesh’s First Internet Newspaper. Accessed 13 Jan 2015
Beck T, Nesmith C (2001) Building on poor people’s capacities: the case of common property resources in India and West Africa. World Dev 29(1):119–133
Belmain SR, Chakma N, Sarker NJ, Sarker SU, Sarker SK, Kamal NQ (2010) The Chittagong Story: studies on the ecology of rat floods and bamboo masting. In: Singleton GR, Belmain SR, Brown PR, Hardy B (eds) Rodent outbreaks: ecology and impacts. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos
Brammer H (1986) Reconnaissance soil and land use survey: Chittagong Hill Tracts (1964–1965). Soil Resources Development Institute, Dhaka
Bwalya SM (2011) Forest dependence on forest income in rural Zambia. Zambia Soc Sci J 2(1):67–86
Cavendish W (2000) Empirical regularities in the poverty environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Dev 28(11):1979–2003
Cavendish W (2002) Quantitaive methods for estimating the economic value of resource use to rural households. In: Campbell BM, Luckert MK (eds) Uncovering the hidden harvest: valuation methods for woodland and forest resources. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, pp 17–66
CIFOR (2014) Center for International Forestry Research Poverty and Environment (PEN) project. http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/pen/_ref/tools/prototype.htm. Accessed 27 July 2014
Feintrenie L, Schwarze S, Levang P (2010) Are local people conservationists? Analysis of transition dynamics from agroforests to monoculture plantations in Indonesia. Ecol Soc 15(4):37. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art37/. Accessed 25 July 2014
Forestal (1966) Chittagong Hill Tracts soil and land use survey, vol. 2 and 4. Forestal International Limited, Vancouver
Halim S, Roy D, Chakma S, Tanchangya SB (2006) Natural resource management country studies: Bangladesh. UNDP Regional Indigenous People’s Program, Bangkok
Jodha N (1986) Common property resources and rural poor in dry regions of India. Econ Pol Wkly 21(27):1169–1181
Kamanga P, Vedeld P, Sjaastad E (2009) Forest incomes and rural livelihoods in Chiradzulu District, Malawi. Ecol Econ 68:613–624
Kar SP, Jacobson MG (2012a) NTFP income contribution to household economy and related socio-economic factors: Lessons from Bangladesh. For Pol Econ 14(1):136–142
Kar SP, Jacobson MG (2012b) Market constraints in NTFP trade: household perspectives in Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. Int For Rev 14(1):50–61
Keeley JE, Bond WJ (1999) Notes and comments: mast floweing and semeplarity in bamboos: the bamboo fire cycle hypothesis. Am Nat 154(3):383–391
Khan S (1997) Parbatya Chattagramer Upajati (in Bengali). Bangla Academy, Dhaka
Khisa SK, Shoaib JM, Khan NA (eds) (2006) Selected natural resource conservation approaches and technologies in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Conservation Approaches and Technologies (BANCAT), SDC-Intercooperation and Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, Chittagong University, Chittagong
Mahapatra AK, Tewari DD (2005) Importance of non-timber forest products in the economic valuation of dry deciduous forests of India. For Pol Econ 7(3):455–467
Mamo G, Sjaastad E, Vedeld P (2007) Economic dependence on forest resources: A case from Dendi District, Ethiopia. For Pol Econ 9(2007):916–927
Mcelwee PD (2008) Forest environmental income in Vietnam: household socioeconomic factors influencing forest use. Environ Conserv 35(2):147–159
Miah MD, Chakma S, Koike M, Muhammed N (2011) Contribution of forests to the livelihood of the Chakma community in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. J For Sci 17(6):449–457. doi:10.1007/s10310-011-0317-y
Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. http://www.mochta.gov.bd/index.php/index/othercontent/Other-Details. Accessed 27 July 2014
Misbahuzzaman K (2007) Problems and prospects of the hilly watersheds in Bangladesh: priorities for their conservation. In: Gebbie L, Glendinning A, Lefroy-Braun R, Victor M (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on sustainable sloping lands and watershed management: linking research to strengthen upland policies and practices. National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Lao PDR, Vientiane, pp 409–415
Nath TK, Inoue M (2009) Forest based settlement project and its impacts on livelihood in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Int For Rev 11(3):394–407
Nayak BP, Kohli P, Sharma JV (2012) Livelihood of local communities and forest degradation in India: issues for REDD+. Ministry of Environment & Forests Government of India, New Delhi. http://envfor.nic.in/sites/default/files/redd-bk3_0.pdf. Accessed 12 Sept 2014
Padoch C, Sunderland T (2014) Managing landscapes for greater food security and improved livelihoods, Unasylva, vol 241, no 64, Food and Agricultural organization, Rome, Italy
Perez MR, Belchar B, Fu M, Yang X (2004) Looking throught the bamboo curtain: an analysis of the changing role of forest and farm income in rural livelihoods in China. Int For Rev 6(3–4):306–316
Quang NV, Sato N (2008) Forest allocation policy and level of forest dependency of economic household groups: a case study in Northern Central Vietnam. Small Scale For 7:49–66
Rahman SA, Rahman MF, Sunderland T (2014) Increasing tree cover in degrading landscapes: ‘integration’ and ‘intensification’ of smallholder forest culture in the Alutilla valley, Matiranga, Bangladesh. Small Scale For 13:237–249. doi:10.1007/s11842-013-9251-5
Rasul G (2007) Political ecology of degradation of forest common in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh. Environ Conserv 34:153–163
Rist S, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2006) Ethnosciences—a step towards the integration of scientific and indigenous forms of knowledge in the management of natural resources for the future. Environ Dev Sustain 8:467–493
Roy D (1995) Land rights, land use and indigenous people in the Chittagong Hill Tracts. In: Gain P (ed) Bangladesh: land forest and forest people. Society for Environment and Human Development (SEHD), Dhaka
Roy D (1997) The population transfer programme of the 1980 s and the land rights of the Indigenous peoples of the Chittagong Hill Tracts”. In: Bhaumik S et al (eds) Living on the edge: essays from the Chittagong Hill Tracts. South Asia Forum for Human Rights, Kathmandu, pp 167–208
Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE, Buiten E, Bird N (2007) The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. For Pol Econ 9:558–577
Sharma CM, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK, Suyal S (2009) Forest resource use patterns in relation to socioeconomic status—a case study in four temperate villages of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Mt Res Dev 29(4):308–319
Yi ZF, Cannona CH, Chena J, Yea CX, Swetnam RD (2014) Developing indicators of economic value and biodiversity loss for rubber plantations in Xishuangbanna, southwest China: a case study from Menglun township. Ecol Indicators 36:788–797
Youn YC (2009) Use of forest resources, traditional forest-related knowledge and livelihood of forest dependent communities: cases in South Korea. For Ecol Manag 257:2027–2034
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the research grant provided by the Poverty Environment Network (PEN) of the Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR, Indonesia) for conducting the fieldwork of this study, and the Faculty of Science (formerly Faculty of Life Sciences) of Copenhagen University, Denmark for providing a visiting scholarship to help prepare an earlier draft of this article. The corresponding author is grateful to Rachel Carson Centre for Environment and Society, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany for providing a research fellowship to prepare a final draft. We would like to thank Arild Angelsen, Terry Sunderland and Ronnie Babigumira for their support and guidance. Many thanks are also extended to the Village Common Forest communities of the CHT who shared their knowledge and provided valuable information for this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Misbahuzzaman, K., Smith-Hall, C. Role of Forest Income in Rural Household Livelihoods: The Case of Village Common Forest Communities in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Small-scale Forestry 14, 315–330 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-015-9290-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-015-9290-1