Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Motives and Incentives for Joining Forest Owner Associations in Estonia

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of private ownership is an important outcome of structural changes for the whole economy as well as for the forestry sector in Estonia. Cooperation between forest owners has been seen as one possibility for increasing the provision of various forest-related benefits and goods. Yet the extent of cooperation between forest owners is still not at a sufficient level, but the reasons have not been extensively studied. The authors’ aim was to find out the key determinants for forest owners to join a forest owner association and to explore how cooperation between owners could be increased. Survey data were used to divide the respondents into two groups according to whether they were members of forest owners associations or not. It was found that one key aspect is the size of the forest property—association members usually manage larger forest areas than non-members. In addition, the members tend to be more active and consistent in forest management activities than non-members. Also there is potential towards cooperation within non-members as their plans for the future are much more targeted. Although there are limits to voluntary cooperation, a huge potential for Estonian private forest owners could be realised by diversifying forest owner association activities and services to meet the different expectations of forest owners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berlin C, Lidestav G, Holm S (2006) Values placed on forest property benefits by Swedish NIPF owners: differences between members in forest owner associations and non-members. Small-scale For Econ, Manag Policy 5(1):83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Darses O, Garcia S, Stenger A (2011) Drivers of cooperation for environmental goods: Evidence from French private forest owners. http://www.esnie.org/students/commun/download/darses_ophelie_15.pdf.html. Accessed 2 July 2011

  • Eramets (2011) Metsaühistud [Forest Owners Associations]. http://www.eramets.ee/metsauhistud. Accessed 31 October 2011 (in Estonian)

  • Erametsakeskus (2011) Erametsanduse aastaraamat Eramets 2009–2010 [Private Forestry Yearbook 2009–2010]. Annual report, Tallinn (in Estonian)

  • Estonian University of Life Sciences (2007) Erametsaomanike ja metsaühistute toetamist vajavate metsamajanduslike tegevuste uuring [Forest owners and forest owners association needs for conducting forest management activities] http://www.eramets.ee/static/files/242.Erametsaomanike_ja_metsauhistute_toetamist_vajavate_metsamajanduslike_tegevuste_uuring.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2011 (in Estonian)

  • Favada IM, Karppinen H, Kuuluvainen J, Mikkola J, Stavness C (2009) Effects of timber prices, ownership objectives, and owner characteristics on timber supply. For Sci 55(6):512–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley AO, Kittredge DB, Stevens TH, Schweik CM, Dennis DC (2006) Interest in cross-boundary cooperation: identification of distinct types of private forest owners. For Sci 52(1):10–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Forinfo (2011) Eesti erametsaomandi struktuur ja kasutamine 2010. Aastal [The structure and use of Estonian private forests in 2010]. Study report, Tallinn (in Estonian)

  • Glück P, Avdibegović M, Ćabaravdić A, Nonic D, Petrović N, Posavec S, Stojanovska M (2010) The preconditions for the formation of private forest owners’ interest associations in the Western Balkan Region. For Policy Econ 12(4):250–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glück P, Avdibegovic A, Cabaravdic A, Nonic D, Petrovic N, Posavec S, Stojanovska M, Imocanin S, Krajter S, Lozanovska N, Maric B, Milijic V, Mrkobrada A, Trninic S (2011) Private forest owners in the Western-Balkans: ready for the formation of interest associations. EFI Research Report 25

  • Ialnazov D, Nenovsky N (2011) A game theory interpretation of the post-communist evolution. J Econ Issues 45(1):41–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingebrigtsen S, Jakobsen O (2009) Moral development of the economic actor. Ecol Econ 68:2777–2784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karppinen H (1998) Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fenn 32(1):43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskkonnateabe Keskus (2012) Aastaraamat Mets 2010 [Yearbook Forest 2010]. Tartu (in Estonian)

  • Kittredge DB (2003) Private forestland owners in Sweden: large-scale cooperation in action. J For 2(2):41–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge DB (2005) The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: international examples and potential applications in the United States. For Policy Econ 7:671–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazdinis M, Pivoriūnas A, Lazdinis I (2005) Cooperation in private forestry of post-soviet system: forest owners’ cooperatives in Lithuania. Small-scale For Econ, Manag Policy 4(4):377–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutze M (2010) Forest owner associations as intermediaries between: forest owners and the wood based industry. In: Small scale forestry in a changing world: opportunities and challenges and the role of extension and technology transfer, IUFRO Conference: 3.08 Small Scale Forestry, 6.06.02 Extension, 6.06.01 Technology Transfer. Bled, Slovenia 6–10 June 2010

  • Malovrh ŠP, Stirn LZ, Krć J (2010) Influences on associating private forest owners in Slovenia. In: Small scale forestry in a changing world: opportunities and challenges and the role of extension and technology transfer, IUFRO Conference: 3.08 Small Scale Forestry, 6.06.02 Extension, 6.06.01 Technology Transfer. Bled, Slovenia 6–10 June 2010

  • Mendes AMSC, Štefanek B, Feliciano D, Mizaraite D, Nonić D, Kitchoukov E, Nybakk E, Duduman G, Weiss G, Nichiforel L, Stoyanova M, Mäkinen P, Alves R, Milijić V, Sarvašova Z (2011) Institutional innovation in European private forestry: the emergence of forest owners’ organizations. In: Weiss G, Pettenella D, Ollonqvist P, Slee B (eds) Innovation in forestry. CABI publishing, Oxfordshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Metsaseadus (2006) Metsaseadus [The Forest Act] 2006. Riigi Teataja I 2006, 30, 232 (in Estonian)

  • Milijic V, Rankovic N, Nonic D, Nedljakovic J (2010) Organization of private forest sector in Timok forest area. Ann For Res 53(1):59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • National Forest Programme 2001–2010 (2002) Ministry of environment of Estonia, Tallinn, pp 37 (in Estonian)

  • National Forest Programme 2011–2020 (2010) Ministry of environment of Estonia, Tallinn, pp 39 (in Estonian)

  • Ní Dhubháin A, Cabanova R, Karppinen H, Mizaraite D, Ritter E, Slee B, Wall S (2007) The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behaviour: the implications for entrepreneurship. Small-scale For 6(4):347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonic D, Bliss JC, Milijic V, Petrovic N, Avdibegovic M, Mataruga M (2011) Challenges of organizing private forest owners in Serbia. Small-Scale For. doi:10.1007/s11842-011-9160-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch P (2007) SWOT analyses and SWOT strategy formulation for forest owner cooperations in Austria. Eur J For Res 126(3):413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickenbach MG, Guries RP, Schmoldt DL (2006) Membership matters: comparing members and non-members of NIPF owner organizations in southwest Wisconsin, USA. For Policy Econ 8:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlueter A (2008) Small-scale European forestry, an anticommons? Int J Commons 2(2):248–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter A (2007) Institutional change in the forestry sector—the explanatory potential of new institutional economics. For Policy Econ 9:1090–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter A, Koch M (2011) Institutional change in the forest sector: trust and mental models. Eur J For Res 130(3):383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraml U (2005) Between legitimacy and efficiency: the development of forestry associations in Germany. Small-scale For Econ, Manag Policy 4(3):251–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Vokun M, Amacher GS, Sullivan J, Wear D (2010) Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate. For Policy Econ 12:104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OR (2000) The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. J Econ Lit 38(3):595–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yearbook Forest 2009 (2010) Estonian environment information centre. Tartu (in Estonian)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Margaret Shannon, Andreas Schuck and all the EFI Winter-Summer School 2011 participants, lecturers and organizers for providing an excellent opportunity to discuss this paper in its various steps of development. Also the valuable comments from the anonymous reviewers were of great help to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priit Põllumäe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H., Kaimre, P. et al. Motives and Incentives for Joining Forest Owner Associations in Estonia. Small-scale Forestry 13, 19–33 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9237-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9237-3

Keywords

Navigation