Abstract
This article proposes a planning approach for private forest holdings that have more than one decision maker, e.g. a heirship group or a joint ownership between siblings. Through a case study example, we illustrate the phases of the proposed planning process and describe the communication and planning tools used in this process. The final aim is that in the future the forest planners’ toolkit would include this kind of approach for rather common situations where it is not easy to reach all the owners for synchronous face-to-face planning sessions. The process started with initial telephone interviews with the forest owners. From these interviews appropriate alternative forest plans were developed. Indicators and their values from the forest plans were inputted into the Mesta internet application. The forest owners were also given guidance on how to use the program. After this they were given time to independently use the program. Once the forest owners finished the use of the program, the results were collected and analyzed. Among the alternative forest plans, one was approved by all of the forest owners. The results of trial use involving a North-Karelian forest holding were encouraging. The main benefits of the approach according to the participants were learning that there are alternatives between which to choose, and reaching a common base level of understanding holding’s production possibilities for future decisions. After developing the process and technical tools further, the proposed model could serve joint ownerships over distance also in practice and in larger scale, and, as a result, foster owners’ engagement on their own forest.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Butler BJ, Leatherberry EC (2004) America’s family forest owners. J For 102(7):4–14
Chen WC, Hong TP, Jeng R (1999) A framework of decision support systems for use on the World Wide Web. J Netw Comput Appl 22:1–17
Fraser NM, Hauge JW (1998) Multicriteria approval: application of approval voting concepts to MCDM problems. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 7:263–272
Hartebrodt C, Bitz C (2007) From framework to forest activities: a comparative analysis of different ownership types in two adjacent regions. Small-Scale For 6(3):309–328
Hiltunen V, Kurttila M, Leskinen P, Pasanen K, Pykäläinen J (2009) Mesta: an internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resources planning. For Policy Econ 11(1):1–9
Hokajärvi R, Hujala T, Leskinen LA, Tikkanen J (2009) Effectiveness of sermon policy instruments: forest management planning practices applying the activity theory approach. Silva Fenn 43(5):889–906
Hujala T, Tikkanen J (2008) Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making. Scand J For Res 23(5):466–477
Kangas J, Store R (2003) Internet and teledemocracy in participatory planning of natural resources management. Landsc Urban Plan 62:89–101
Kangas A, Kangas J, Pykaäläinen J (2001) Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning. Silva Fenn 35:215–227
Karppinen H, Hänninen H, Ripatti P (2002) Suomalainen metsänomistaja(Finnish forest owner 2000), Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 852. Vantaa Research Centre, Gummerus Oy Jyväskylä In Finnish
Keeney R, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kendra A, Hull RB (2005) Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. For Sci 51(2):142–154
Kolb DA (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
Leskinen P, Hujala T, Tikkanen J, Kainulainen T, Kangas A, Kurttila M, Pykäläinen J, Leskinen L (2009) Adaptive decision analysis in forest management planning. For Sci 55(2):95–108
Mahmood MA, Burn JM, Gemoets LA, Jacquez C (2000) Variables affecting information technology and end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:751–771
O’Keefe RM, Chau PYK, Massey A, Montoya-Weiss M, Perry M (2000) From the user interface to the consumer interface: results from a global experiment. Int J Hum Comput Stud 53:611–628
Pasanen K, Kurttila M, Pykäläinen J, Kangas J, Leskinen P (2005) Mesta—nonindustrial private forest owners’ decision-support environment for the evaluation of alternative forest plans over the Internet. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 4(4):601–620
Redsven V, Hirvelä H, Härkönen K, Salminen O, Siitonen M (2007) MELA2007 reference manual. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helenski, p 642
Serbruyns I, Luyssaert S (2006) Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management. For Policy Econ 9(3):285–296
Steuer R (1986) Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and application. Wiley, New York
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions on health. Yale University Press, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT
Wiersum KF, Elands BHM, Hoogstra MA (2005) Small-scale forest ownership across Europe: characteristics and future potential. Small-scale For 4:1–19
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by the Academy of Finland (decision number 127681).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eyvindson, K., Kurttila, M., Hujala, T. et al. An Internet-Supported Planning Approach for Joint Ownership Forest Holdings. Small-scale Forestry 10, 1–17 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-010-9123-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-010-9123-1