Skip to main content
Log in

Community attitudes towards private native forestry in New South Wales

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An on-line survey during August–September 2006 examined community attitudes toward private native forestry. Views expressed by the 156 respondents confirmed prior hypotheses that attitudes would correlate with associations (e.g. professionals in favour of incentives, farmers in favour of freedom to manage, conservationists in favour of regulations), and with interest (biodiversity enthusiasts in favour of regulations, producers in favour of incentives), but refuted the prior hypotheses that urban dwellers would be more likely to favour regulations. Respondents appear to reflect different constituencies with divergent views without a shared understanding of the condition and dynamics of private native forests in NSW. This indicates the need for more extension and public education, particularly since forests continue to be an election issue. The survey did not gauge support for private native forestry, but helps to untangle the views from the constituencies promoting them. Regulatory approaches received most support from respondents affiliated with an environmental group, with a national concern for biodiversity, who fear that private native forests are in poor condition and will degrade further. Advocates for more landholder freedom tend to be landholders who believe that private native forests are in better condition than comparable State Forests, and who are optimistic about the future for private native forests. Advocates for incentives tend to be urban dwellers with a production focus and professional affiliation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen J (1977) Statistical analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Deane PM (2004) A failing science: understanding private landholders in the forestry milieu. M.Phil. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra, May 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/43243, accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • Deane P, Schirmer J, Bauhus J (2003) How private landholders use and value the native forest that they own: a report based on a sample survey conducted in south-east New South Wales. School of Resources Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison J (2006) as reported in ‘Environmentalists and farmers at loggerheads over forestry backdown’, The Northern Rivers Echo, vol 12(35), Thursday 31 August (2006) http://www.echonews.com/index.php?page=View%20Article&article=8498&issue=145, accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • Nichols JD (2007) Evolution and development of a code for private native forestry in New South Wales, Australia. Small-Scale Forestry 6(2): (in press)

  • NSW CRA (1999) Private Forest Management Intent Survey – Northern NSW CRA regions, forests taskforce, Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Barton, ACT. http://dpie.gov.au/corporate_docs/publications/pdf/forestry/rfa/nsw/northeast/nsw_ne_na47es.pdf, accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • NSW DNR (2006) Draft code of practice for private native forests. NSW Dept of Natural Resources, Sydney. http://www.dnr.nsw.gov.au/vegetation/pnf.shtml, accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • NSW EPA (1997) NSW state of the environment report 1997, NSW Environment protection authority, Sydney. http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/soe/97/ch2/16_6.htm, accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • Prest J (2003) The forgotten forests: the environmental regulation of forestry on private land in New South Wales between 1997 and 2002. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wollongong. http://www.library.uow.edu.au/adt-NWU/uploads/approved/adt-NWU20050922.121033/public/, accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • Queensland CRA/RFA steering committee (1998) An inventory of private forests of South East Queensland. Final Report SE 1.4, November 1998, 52 pp. http://www.daff.gov.au/corporate_docs/publications/pdf/forestry/rfa/qld/qld_se_raa_se1.4.pdf, accessed 15 Jan 2007

  • Resource Assessment Commission (1992) Forest and timber inquiry: final report, AGPS, Canberra, vol 1. p 495

  • Vanclay JK, Thompson D, Sayer J, McNeely J, Kaimowitz D, Gibbs A, Crompton H, Cameron D, Bevege I (2006) A proposal for stewardship support to private native forests in NSW. The Southern Cross Group of forest researchers and practitioners, ISBN 0-97775976-1-X. http://www.privateforestry.org.au/SCGplain.pdf, accessed 15 Jan 2007

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerome K. Vanclay.

Appendix A: Questionnaire for the Web-based Survey

Appendix A: Questionnaire for the Web-based Survey

  1. (1)

    In your view, what is the typical condition of private native forest in NSW, with respect to comparable public forest in the vicinity?

    • Good

    • Slightly better

    • Comparable

    • Slightly worse

    • Poor

    • Don’t know

  2. (2)

    Given the current regulations and markets, what is your prognosis for private native forests? Will they...

    • Be cleared and converted to other uses

    • Deteriorate

    • Remain the same

    • Improve

    • Don’t know

  3. (3)

    Does your concern for private forests relate primarily to forests...

    • Nationally

    • State-wide

    • Within your region

    • Within your immediate neighbourhood

  4. (4)

    What is your major concern regarding these forests?

    • Biodiversity (protection of fauna and flora)

    • Scenery and recreation opportunities

    • Other environmental services (water, salinity, etc)

    • Production (of timber, honey, etc)

  5. (5)

    What do you think is the major threat to these forests?

    • Clearing for urban development

    • Clearing for agriculture

    • Fire (burning-off or wildfire)

    • Grazing

    • Logging

    • Weeds and feral animals

    • Other neglect (dumping of rubbish, drift of farm chemicals, etc)

  6. (6)

    What do you think is the best way to get better outcomes for private native forests in NSW?

    • Stronger legislation and more rigorous enforcement

    • Giving landholders more freedom to do as they see fit

    • Offering financial incentives for specified outcomes

    • Other (please specify)

  7. (7)

    Please tell us a little about yourself: Your age?

    • Under 21

    • 21–35

    • 36–50

    • 51–65

    • Over 65

  8. (8)

    Where do you live?

    • In Sydney

    • In a regional city

    • In a country town

    • Rural residential

    • On a farm

  9. (9)

    Where do you work?

    • Office

    • Factory

    • At home (or don’t work)

    • On the land (farm or forest)

    • Service industry (indoor)

    • Service industry (outdoor)

    • Other indoor

    • Other outdoor

  10. (10)

    How often do you visit a forest (private or public, for work or pleasure, to walk or picnic)?

    • Couple times a week

    • Couple of times a month

    • Couple times a year

    • Rarely

  11. (11)

    Do you belong to any of the following groups?

    • Conservation organization

    • Farmers federation

    • Political party

    • Professional association

  12. (12)

    Any other observations or concerns about private native forests?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanclay, J.K. Community attitudes towards private native forestry in New South Wales. Small-scale Forestry 6, 177–188 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-007-9009-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-007-9009-z

Keywords

Navigation