Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Survey of Forestland Conservation Easements in the United States: Implications for Forestland Owners and Managers

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internationally, conservation easements are increasingly popular land management tools for private landowners, government agencies and non-governmental organizations seeking to preserve forests and other natural settings. This paper reports a study of the design and use of conservation easements by organizations and public agencies in the USA. More than 355 conservation organizations and 16 state agencies holding at least 3,598 forestland easements were identified. Demonstrated shortfalls in baseline forest inventories, record keeping, and professionally-developed management plans were evident on working forest easements. Failure to address these shortcomings runs the risk of jeopardizing the legitimacy of the easement approach even where favorable legal and tax conditions exist. Management restrictions varied broadly, with a minority of respondents prohibiting such techniques as clearcutting and salvage logging. Concerns for the use of chemicals, best management practices, and streamside management zones were commonly reflected in easement language, whereas logging road design and the cultivation of old-growth conditions remain largely undeveloped. Implications from the US experience, where easements are relatively well-developed, highlights the need for professional forestry advice—particularly for non-industrial or small-scale forest owners—in both easement development and implementation, the need for careful planning, and the need to carefully consider the respective goals of the forest landowners in crafting the easement documents. In the cases of developing nations, consideration of the differing needs of landowners may require increased flexibility in management documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alig RJ, Plantinga AJ, Anh S, Kline JD (2003) Land use changes involving forestry in the United States: 1952–1997, with projections to 2050. Gen Tech Report PNW-GTR-587. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR

    Google Scholar 

  • Bick S (1996) Donations and sales of conservation easements on forestland in the northern forest of New York State. Diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia

  • Bick S, Haney HL Jr (2001) The landowner’s guide to conservation easements. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Boelhower ME (1995) Forest forever: a comprehensive evaluation of conservation easements on working forests in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont. Masters Thesis, University of New Hampshire, Durham

  • Bowles I, Downes D, Clark D, Guérin-McManus M (1998) Economic incentives and legal tools for private sector conservation. Duke Environ Law Policy Forum 8(2):209–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Leatherberry EC (2004) American family forest owners. J Forest 102(7):4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubbage FW, O’Laughlin J, Bullock III CS (1993) Forest resource policy. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • de Klemm C, Shine C (1993) Biological diversity conservation and the law. Environmental Policy and Law Paper No. 29. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland

  • Diehl J, Barrett TS (1988) The conservation easement handbook: managing land conservation and historic preservation easement programs. Land Trust Exchange and the Trust for Public Land, Alexandria, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (2000) Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Endicott E (ed) (1993) Land conservation through public/private partnerships. Island Press, Washington, DC

  • Gaddis DA (1999) An analysis of wetlands regulation and conservation easements on private nonindustrial forest lands in North Carolina. Diss., North Carolina State University. Available online at http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/wq/LandPreservationNotebook/PDFDocuments/gaddis.pdf; last accessed March 2003

  • Haney HL, Hoover WL, Siegal WC, Greene JL (2001) Forest landowners’ guide to the federal income tax. Agriculture Handbook No. 718. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC

  • Helms JA (ed) (1998) The dictionary of forestry. The Society of American Foresters, Washington DC

  • Joint Commission on Taxation (2005) Options to improve tax compliance and reform tax expenditures. JCS-02-05. U.S. Congress, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila M, Puustjärvi E (2004) Markets for forest environmental services: reality and potential. Unasylva 219(55):53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzman MT, Cale WG Jr (1990) Tropical forest preservation using economic incentives. BioScience 40(11):827–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss A (2004) Making biodiversity conservation a land use priority. In: McShane T, Wells M (eds) Getting biodiversity projects to work: towards more effective conservation and development. Columbia University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Land Trust Alliance (LTA) 2001. Summary data from the national land trusts census. Available online at http://www.lta.org/newsrom/census_summary_data.htm; last accessed July 2003

  • Lehman T (1995) Public Values, private lands: farmland preservation policy, 1933–1985. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind B (2001) Working forest conservation easements: a process guide for land trusts, landowners, and public agencies. Land Trust Alliance, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney JD (2002) Perpetual restrictions on land and the problem of the future. Virginia Law Rev 88(4):739–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy TJ (1998) Legal aspects of owning and managing woodlands. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Merenlender AM, Huntsinger L, Guthey G, Fairfax SK (2004) Land trusts and conservation easements: who is conserving what for whom? Conserv Biol 18(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer MJ (2004) Forest regulations in the USA: evolving standards for conserving forest biodiversity in the past 300 years. In: Honnay E, Verheyen K, Bossuyt B, Hermy M (eds) Forest biodiversity: lessons from history for conservation. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 269–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker D (2002) Cost-effective strategies for conserving private land: an economic analysis for land trusts and policy makers. Political Economy Research Center, Bozeman, MT

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot G (1947) Breaking new ground. Harcourt, Brace, and Co., New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilla E (2002) Landowners, while pleased with agricultural easements, suggest improvements. Calif Agric 56(1):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small SJ (2002) Preserving family lands: book III. Landowner Planning Center, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WB, Miles PD, Visage JS, Pugh SA (2004) Forest resources of the United States, 2002. Gen Tech. Report. NC-241. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN

  • Snider AG, Pattanayak SK, Sills EO, Schuler JL (2003) Policy innovations for private forest management and conservation in Costa Rica. J Forest 101(50):18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens J (2006) Fairfax case draws line on easements. Washington Post. June 4. Available at www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/03

  • Swift B, Arias V, Bass S, Chacon CM, Cortes A, Gutierrez M, Maldonando V, Milano M, Nunes L, Tobar M, Sanjines V, Solano P, Theulen V (2004) Private lands conservation in Latin America: the need for enhanced legal tools and incentives. J Environ Law Litig 19(1):85–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Telesetsky A (2001) Graun bilong mipela na piela no tromweim: The viability of international conservation easements to protect Papua new Guinea’s declining biodiversity. Georgetown Int Environ Law Rev 13(3):735–778

    Google Scholar 

  • The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (2004) Imagining the future: our long term vision for the forests of the Berkshire Taconic landscape. Available online at http://nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/berkshire/about/art2313.html: last accessed April 2004

  • US Department of Agriculture (2004) U.S. agriculture and forestry greenhouse gas inventory: 1990–2001. Global Climate Change Program Office. Office of the Chief Economist. US Department of Agriculture. Technical Bulletin No. 1907

  • Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Doken DJ (eds) (2000) Land use, land use change, and forestry: a special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Wear DN, Greis JG (2002) The southern forest resource assessment. Gen Tech. Report SRS-53. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC

  • Wolman A (2004) Review of conservation payment initiatives in Latin America: conservation concessions, conservation incentive agreements and permit retirement schemes. William and Mary Environ Law Policy Rev 28(3):859–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright JB (1993) Conservation easements: an analysis of donated development rights. J Am Plan Assoc 59(4):487–493

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forestry, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    Michael J. Mortimer, Jeffrey S. Huff & Harry L. Haney Jr.

  2. School of Public and International Affairs, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    Jesse J. Richardson Jr.

Authors
  1. Michael J. Mortimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesse J. Richardson Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey S. Huff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Harry L. Haney Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Mortimer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortimer, M.J., Richardson, J.J., Huff, J.S. et al. A Survey of Forestland Conservation Easements in the United States: Implications for Forestland Owners and Managers. Small-scale Forestry 6, 35–47 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-007-9003-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-007-9003-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation