Ecological, socio-cultural, economic and political factors influencing the contribution of non-timber forest products to local livelihoods: Case studies from honduras and the Philippines

  • Anja Nygren
  • Celeste Lacuna-Richman
  • Kati Keinänen
  • Loreta Alsa


Discussion of the role of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in efforts to reconcile the objectives of forest conservation and rural development has often been hampered by limited understanding of the complexity of the factors that affect the contribution of NTFPs to local livelihoods. By drawing upon two case studies where NTFPs play an important role - the municipality of Lepaterique in Honduras and Palawan Island in the Philippines - this study emphasizes that an ideal extractive system should be based on a mix of products to enable sustainable harvesting throughout the year. The study also demonstrates that considerable attention needs to be paid to the socio-cultural heterogeneity of resource users, and to the value chain structure, access and control over resources and political transparency that affect the opportunities for local people to benefit from NTFP extraction.


third world household economies NTFPs resin tapping charcoal local livelihoods value chains 


  1. AFE-COHDEFOR (2003), Anuario estadistico forestal 2002, Administración Forestal del Estado, Tegucigalpa.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C.C. (1999), ‘Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation’, World Development, 27(4): 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelsen, A. and Wunder, S. (2003), Exploring the Forest-Poverty Link: Key Concepts, Issues and Research Implications, Occasional Paper No. 40, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor.Google Scholar
  4. Belcher, B. (1998), ‘A production-to-consumption systems approach: lessons from the bamboo and rattan sectors in Asia’, in E. Wollenberg and A. Ingles (eds), Incomes from the Forest, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, pp. 57–86.Google Scholar
  5. Belcher, B., Ruíz-Pérez, M. and Achdiawan, R. (2005), ‘Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: implications for livelihoods and conservation’, World Development, 33(9): 1435–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. COHDEFOR (2002), Plan de manejo forestal de Lepaterique, Fco Morazán, Corporación Hondureña de Desarrollo Forestal, Tegucigalpa.Google Scholar
  7. Contreras, A. (2000), ‘Rethinking participation and empowerment in the uplands’, in P. Utting (ed.), Forest Policy and Politics in the Philippines: The Dynamics of Participatory Conservation, Ateneo de Manila University Press, Manila, pp. 144–170.Google Scholar
  8. FAO (2005), Global Forest Resources Assessment, FAO Forestry Paper No 147, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  9. FEHCAFOR (2002), Estrategia de resinación, Federación Hondureña de Cooperativas Agroforestales, Tegucigalpa.Google Scholar
  10. FMB (1997), Philippine Forestry Statistics, Forest Management Bureau, Quezon City.Google Scholar
  11. FMB (2002), Philippine Forestry Statistics, Forest Management Bureau, Quezon City.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, S.R. and Herbohn, J.L. (2001), ‘The importance of non-timber products in tropical small-scale forestry’, in S.R. Harrison and J.L. Herbohn (eds), Sustainable Farm Forestry in the Tropics: Social and Economic Analysis and Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
  13. INE (2004), Niveles de pobreza según veintiles - año 2002, Instituto Nacional de Estadística,, accessed 1 November 2004.Google Scholar
  14. Keinänen, K. (2004), Resource Access and Profitability in Forest Product Value Chains in Honduras: Case Studies of Lepaterique and Rio Cangrejal, M.Sc. thesis, Department of Forest Economics, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  15. Kellert, S.R., Mehta, J.N., Ebbin, S. and Lichtenfeld, L. (2000), ‘Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality’, Society and Natural Resources, 13(8): 705–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lacuna-Richman, C. (2003), ‘Ethnicity and the utilization of non-wood forest products: findings from three Philippine villages’, Silva Fennica, 37(1): 129–148.Google Scholar
  17. Lacuna-Richman, C. (2004), ‘Subsistence strategies of an indigenous minority in the Philippines: non-wood forest product use by the Tagbanua of Narra, Palawan’, Economic Botany, 58(2): 266–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leach, M., Mearns, R. and Scoones, I. (1999), ‘Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based resource management’, World Development, 27(2): 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neumann, R.P. and Hirsch, E. (2000), Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of research, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor.Google Scholar
  20. Nygren, A. (2000), ‘Development discourses and peasant-forest relations: natural resource utilization as a social process’, Development and Change, 31(1): 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nygren, A. (2005), ‘Community-based forest management within the context of institutional decentralization in Honduras’, World Development, 33(4): 639–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oseguera de Ochoa, M. (1993), Estudio socio-económico de las aldeas Cuasucaran y el Carrizal, Municipios de Ojojona y Lepaterique, Departamento de Francisco Morazán, Programa Regional Forestal de Centro América, Tegucigalpa.Google Scholar
  23. Oseguera de Ochoa, M. (1999), El rol del recurso forestal en el desarrollo rural sostenible: modelo de intervención comunitaria, Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras.Google Scholar
  24. PNUD (2004), Informe sobre desarrollo humano en Honduras 2003, Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, San José.Google Scholar
  25. Ribot, J.C. (1998), ‘Theorizing access: forest profits along Senegal’s charcoal commodity chain’, Development and Change, 29(2): 307–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruíz Pérez, M. and Byron, N. (1999), ‘A methodology to analyze divergent case studies of non-timber forest products and their development potential’, Forest Science, 45(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  27. Ruíz Pérez, M., Belcher, B., Achdiawan, R., Alexiades, M. et al. (2004), ‘Markets drive the specialization strategies of forest peoples’, Ecology and Society, 9(2),, accessed 10 January 2005.Google Scholar
  28. Salafsky, N., Dugelby, B.L. and Terbough, J.W. (1993), ‘Can extractive reserves save the rain forest? An ecological and socioeconomic comparison of non-timber forest product extraction systems in Péten, Guatemala and West Kalimantan, Indonesia’, Conservation Biology, 1(1): 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sánchez, J. (2001), Estudio de la resinación tradicional en Lepaterique, PROCAFOR, Tegucigalpa.Google Scholar
  30. Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as Qualitative Research, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Shanley, P. Luz, L. and Swingland, I.R. (2002), ‘The faint promise of a distant market: a survey of Belem’s trade in non-timber forest products’, Biodiversity and Conservation, 11(4): 615–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Suazo, J., Walker, I., Ramos, M. and Santos Zelaya, A. (1997), ‘Políticas forestales en Honduras’, in O. Segura, D. Kaimowitz and J. Rodriquez (eds), Políticas forestales en Centro América, EDICPSA, San Salvador, pp. 235–267.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, P.L. (2005), ‘In the market but not of it: fair trade coffee and forest stewardship council certification as market-based social change’, World Development, 33(1): 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Widmann, P. (1998), A Guide to the Ecosystems of Palawan, Philippines, Times Editions, Singapore.Google Scholar
  35. Wollenberg, E. (2000), ‘Methods for estimating forest income and their challenges’, Society and Natural Resources, 13(8): 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wunder, S. (2001), ‘Poverty alleviation and tropical forests - what scope for synergies?’, World Development, 29(11): 1817–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anja Nygren
    • 1
  • Celeste Lacuna-Richman
    • 2
  • Kati Keinänen
    • 3
  • Loreta Alsa
    • 4
  1. 1.Environmental Science and PolicyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of JoensuuFinland
  3. 3.Department of Forest EconomicsUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.NATRIPALPuerto Princesa Citythe Philippines

Personalised recommendations