Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship between farm size and reforestation activity: evidence from Queensland studies

  • Published:
Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the findings of nine studies carried out over about the last decade by a forestry socio-economic research group in Queensland, Australia. On the basis of survey evidence and landholder typology research, the questions of who plants trees and for what reasons are addressed, and inferences are drawn about the impact of land fragmentation on farm forestry. It is concluded that forestry is less popular on the larger and commercially viable farms than on smaller holdings of similar land type, and plantation establishment is often supported by off-farm income, so that farm fragmentation may actually lead to increased tree planting. However, whether this would lead to increased timber production is less clear, because of the strong interest of people on small holdings in environmental plantings and because of difficulties in marketing small quantities of the variable quality timber from mixed-species plantings. Also, the quality of silviculture appears to be positively correlated with area planted. Some implications are drawn for land-use policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Creighton, C. and Sexton, G. (1996), ‘Community Rainforest Reforestation Program — a farm forestry demonstration’, in A. Grodecki, J. Aitchison and P. Grimbeek, Managing and Growing Trees Training Conference, 8–10 October, held in Bundaberg, Department of Natural Resources, Brisbane, Vol. 1, pp. 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, J.H., Blatner, K.A. and Baumgartner, D.M. (2004), ‘The future of Washington State family-owned forests in an increasingly fragmented landscape’, in D.M. Baumagartner, (ed.), Proceedings of Human Dimensions of Family, Farm and Community Forestry International Symposium, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA, 29 March — 1 April 2004, Washington State University Extension MISC0526, pp. 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRRP Management Committee (1993), Community Rainforest Reforestation Program: Sowing the Seeds for a Future Wet Tropics Timber Industry, Queensland Department of Primary Industries Forest Service, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emtage, N.F., Harrison, S.R. and Herbohn, J.L. (2001), ‘Landholder attitudes to and participation in farm forestry activities in sub-tropical and tropical Eastern Australia’, in S.R. Harrison and J.L. Herbohn (eds), Tropical Small-scale Forestry: Social and Economic Analysis and Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emtage, N.F. (1995), Landholders’ Perceptions of Planting and Managing Trees, B.App. Sci. Hons. thesis, Southern Cross University, Lismore NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emtage, N.F. and Specht, A. (1998), Landholders’ Perceptions of Farm Forestry in the Northern Rivers Region of New South Wales: Overview Report, report to the Northern Rivers Regional Plantation Committee, Lismore NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eono, J-C. and Harrison, S.R. (1996a), ‘Report on non-timber benefits of rainforest reforestation’, Annual Conference of the Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Kuranda, Queensland: Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eono, J-C. and Harrison, S.R. (1996b), ‘Local Government and Landholder Perceptions of the Benefits of Planting Rainforest Tree Species in the Queensland Wet Tropics’, in A. Keto, (ed.) World Heritage Tropical Forests Conference: Handbook and Abstracts, Cairns: Australian Rainforest Conservation Society: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eono, J-C. and Harrison, S.R. (2002), ‘Estimation of costs and benefits of the community rainforest reforestation program in North Queensland’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 32(2): 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, P.D., Lamb, D. and Bristow, M. (eds) (2005), Reforestation in the Tropics and Subtropics of Australia using Rainforest Tree Species, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation and the Rainforest CRC, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S.R., Eono, J-C., Herbohn, J.L. and Sharma, P. (1996), ‘Attitudes to tree planting and assistance schemes by Queensland landholders’, in A. Grodecki (ed.), Managing and Growing Trees on Farms, Vol 1, Greening Australia Queensland, Brisbane, pp. 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S.R., Miamo, J. and Anderson, M.W. (1999), ‘Government and private sector joint venturing in natural resource development: The Queensland forestry joint venture scheme plantation’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 29(1): 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S.R., Herbohn, J.L., Emtage, N.F. and Smorfitt, D.B. (2001), ‘Landholder attitudes to forestry incentive schemes in North Queensland’, in A. Grodecki (eds), Managing and Growing Trees: Farm Forestry and Vegetation Management, Kooralbyn, 19–21 October 1998, Department of Natural Resources and Greening Australia, Brisbane, pp. 406–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R., Harrison, S.R. and Herbohn, J.L. (2004), ‘Evaluation of the performance of the Community Rainforest Reforestation Program in North Queensland, Australia’, Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3(3): 411–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbohn, J.L., Harrison, S.R., Emtage, N.F. and Smorfitt, D.B. (1998), ‘Attitudes of landholders to farm forestry in North Queensland and the implications for policy development’, Integration Environmental Values into Small Scale Forestry, IUFRO Symposium, Vancouver, 16–20 August 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbohn, J.L., Harrison, S.R., Ross, H. and Slaughter, G. (2003), ‘A framework for assessing the social, economic and environmental impacts of different forestry systems in North Queensland’, IUFRO Working Group 6.11.02 Forestry and Rural Development in Developed Countries, International Symposium on Forestry and Rural Development in Developed Countries: Policies, Programs and Impacts, Rotarua, New Zealand, 10–13 March.

  • Herbohn, J.L. and Harrison, S.R. (2004), ‘The evolving nature of small-scale private forestry in Australia’, Journal of Forestry 102(1): 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbohn, J.L., Emtage, N.F., Harrison, S.R. and Smorftt, D.B. (2005), ‘Attitudes of landholders to farm forestry in tropical eastern Australia’, Australian Forestry, Vol. 68(1): 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, I. (2003), ‘The use of compensatory and non-compensatory multi-criteria analysis in small-scale forestry’, Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3(1): 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, I. (in process), ‘A Multi-Objective Decision Support System (MODSS) with Stakeholders and Experts in the Atherton Tablelands’, Ch. 10 in Application of Multiple Objective Decision Support Systems for Participatory Farm Forestry Evaluation, PhD dissertation, The University of Queensland, Gatton.

  • Maczkowiack, R., Herbohn, J.L., Emtage, N.F., Slaughter, G. and Harrison, S.R. (in press), Assessment of Agroforestry Projects in Northern Australia using the Australian Farm Forestry Financial Model, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Research Report Series, Canberra.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrison, S., Herbohn, J. Relationship between farm size and reforestation activity: evidence from Queensland studies. Small-scale Forestry 4, 471–484 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0029-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0029-2

Keywords

Navigation