Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of social aspects in extent of on-farm tree growing in subsistence agroforestry systems of Western Himalaya

  • Published:
Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many so-called society-oriented agroforestry programs, mainly in developing countries, fail because they do not take account of the social structure in their design. This study provides empirical evidence of the impact of social structure on the extent of on-farm tree growing. The study has been carried out in Mandi district of Himachal Pradesh, in Indian Western Himalaya. Analysis of survey data reveals significant relationships between extent of on-farm tree growing and caste, education of the head of household, family literacy, primary occupation, government employment, mobility of the household head, importance of tree growing for future generations, and holy tree worship practices. Households with concrete houses had more trees than households with mixed, mud and wooden houses. The study implies a need to consider social factors to encourage the level of on-farm tree growing and to design socially acceptable agroforestry programs. The study also emphasises the need for a holistic approach to agroforestry development by integrating other continuing rural development programs with that of agroforestry to increase the level of on-farm tree growing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1986), ‘Of social forestry and other tree-planting schemes’, in B. Agarwal, Cold Hearths and Barren Slopes: the Woodfuel Crisis in the Third World, Zed Books, London, pp. 106–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbar, G., Baig, M.B. and Asif, M. (2000), ‘Social aspects in launching successful agroforestry projects in developing countries’, Science Vision, 5: 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J.E.M. and Dewees, P.A. (1995), Tree Management in Farmer Strategies: Responses to Agricultural Intensification, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atul, Punam and Khosla, P.K. (1994), ‘Himachal Himalayan agroecosystem status: a case study’, Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, 10(4): 271–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayling, D.R. (1991), Making Forestry Research Relevant to Third World Farmers, Social Forestry Network Paper 12d, Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balokhra, J.M. (1999), The Wonderland Himachal Pradesh — A Survey of the Geography, People, History, Administrative History, Art and Architecture, Culture and Economy, H.G. Publications, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J. (1995), ‘Tree cultivation by farmers in Dolakha district, Nepal,’ in N.C. Saxena and V. Ballabh (eds), Farm Forestry in South Asia, Sage Publications, New Delhi, pp. 104–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M.M. (1992), ‘A sociological framework: policy, environment and the social actors for tree planting’, in N.P. Sharma (ed.), Managing the World’s Forest: Looking for the Balance between Conservation and Development, Hunt Publication Co., Iowa. pp. 301–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M.M. (1994), ‘Using knowledge from social science in development projects’, Project Appraisal, 9: 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chundamannil, M., Krishnankutty, C.N. and Rajan, A.R. (1993), Socio-economic Study of Farm Forestry — A Survey of Four Villages in Kerala, KFRI Research Report No. 90, Kerala Forest Research Institute, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • DFID (1999), Country Strategy Papers, India, Department for International Development (United Kingdom), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., Just, R.E. and Zilberman, D. (1985), ‘Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33: 255–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortmann, L. (1988), ‘Great planting disasters: pitfalls in technical assistance in forestry’, Agriculture and Human Values, 5: 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FSI (Forest Survey of India), (1999), State of Forest Report, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Dehra Dun, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garforth, C.J., Malla, Y.B., Neupane, R.P. and Pandit, B.H. (1999), ‘Socioeconomic factors and agroforestry improvement in the hills of Nepal’, Mountain Research and Development, 19(3): 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, D.A. and Nurse, M.C. (1995), ‘Farmer initiatives in increasing tree cover in central Nepal’, in N.C. Saxena and V. Ballabh (eds), Farm Forestry in South Asia, Sage Publications, New Delhi/Thousand Oaks, London, pp. 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, A., Mahapatra, A. and Mitchell, C.P. (2001), ‘Modes of communication and effectiveness of agroforestry extension in Eastern India’, Human Ecology, 29(3): 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOHP (1997), Brief Facts. Himachal Pradesh, Department of Statistics and Economics, Govemment of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOHP (2000), Himachal in Figures, Department of Economics and Statistics, Govemment of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOHP (2001), Economic Survey of Himachal Pradesh, Department of Economics and Statistics, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, M.W. (1987), ‘Agroforestry and the social milieu’, in H.A. Steppler and P.K.R. Nair (eds), Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, ICRAF, Nairobi, pp. 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, V.J. and Alles, W.S. (1989), ‘The Kandyab gardens of Sri Lanka’, in P.K.R. Nair (ed.), Agroforestry in the Tropics, Kluwer Academic Publishers in cooperation with ICRAF, Dordrecht, pp. 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, L.K. (1996), Forestry for Rural Development, S.B. Nangia for APH Publishing Corporation, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, S.R. (1997), Diagnostic Survey and Productivity Appraisal of Agroforestry Systems in Subtemperate and Sub-humid Region of Himachal Pradesh, MSc thesis (unpublished), Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Solan, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lionberger, H.F. (1960), Adoption of New Ideas and Practices, Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, A.L. (1976), Agriculture Technology in Developing Countries, Rotterdam University Press, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra, A.K. (1997), Factors Influencing Adoption of Farm Level Tree Planting in Social Forestry in Orissa, India, PhD thesis (unpublished), University of Aberdeen, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra, A.K. and Mitchell, C.P. (2001), ‘Classify tree planters and non-planters in subsistence farming system using a discriminant analytical approach’, Agroforestry Systems, 52(1): 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malla, Y.B. (2000), ‘Farmer’s tree management strategies in a changing rural economy and factors influencing decisions on tree growing in Nepal’, International Tree Crop Journal, 10: 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, D.A. and Hyde, W.F. (1991), ‘The economics of agroforestry’, in W.R. Burch and J.K. Parker (eds), Social Science Applications in Asian Agroforestry, Winrock International, USA, Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi, pp. 111–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, D.E. and Miller, R.P. (1998), ‘Socio-economic research in agroforestry: progress, prospects, and priorities’, Agroforestry Systems, 38(1–3): 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P.K.R. (1998), ‘Directions in tropical agroforestry research: past, present and future’, Agroforestry Systems, 38(1–3): 223–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair, P.K.R. and Dagar, J.C. (1991), ‘An approach to developing methodologies for evaluating agroforestry systems in India’, Agroforestry Systems, 16(1): 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negi, Y.S. (1993), The Conditions for Agroforestry on Farms in the Western Himalayas of India, PhD thesis (unpublished), University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neupane, R.P., Sharma, K.R. and Thapa, G.B. (2002), ‘Adoption of agroforestry in the hills of Nepal: a logistic regression analysis’, Agricultural Systems, 72(3): 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raintree, J.B. (1986), ‘Designing agroforestry for rural development: ICRAF’s diagnosis and design approach’, in P.K. Kholsa, S. Puri and D.K. Khurana (eds), Agroforestry Systems — A New Challenge, ISTS, Solan, pp. 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations (4th edn), The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. and Svenning, L. (1969), Modernisation Amongst Peasants, The Impact of Communication, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royer, J.P. (1987), ‘Determinants of reforestation behaviour among southern landowners’, Forest Science, 33(3): 654–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, N.C. (1995), ‘Trees on farm lands in Uttar Pradesh: socio-economic characteristics of tree planters’, in N.C. Saxena and V. Ballabh (eds), Farm Forestry in South Asia, Sage Publications, New Delhi, pp. 219–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, N.C. and Srivastva, R. (1995), ‘Tree growing as an option for supervision-constrained farmers in North-west India’, in N.C. Saxena and V. Ballabh (eds), Farm Forestry in South Asia, Sage Publications, New Delhi, pp. 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr, S.J. (1995), ‘Meeting household needs: farmer tree growing strategies in western Kenya’, in J.E.M. Arnold and D.A. Dewees (eds), Tree Management in Farmer Strategies: Responses to Agricultural Intensification, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 141–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, A.D., Rehman, T. and Yates, C.M. (2003), ‘Logit models for identifying the factors that influence the uptake of ‘no tillage’ technologies by farmers in the rice-wheat farming systems of Pakistan’s Punjab’, Agricultural Systems, 75(1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Rikhari, H.C. and Palni, L.M.S. (1999), ‘Conservation of natural resources through religion: A case from Central Himalaya’, Society and Nature, 12: 599–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, B. (1992), Social Forestry for Rural Development. A Socio-economic Perspective, Anmol Publications, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D.V. and Sikka, B.K. (1993), Impact Evaluation Study, National Social Forestry Project Himachal Pradesh, Agro-Economic Research Centre, Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R.V. (1986), People’s Participation in Social Forestry Programmes in Himachal Pradesh, Forest Research Institute and Colleges, Dehra Dun.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, R.M. and Kumar, V. (1997), ‘An analysis of socio-economic implications influencing people’s participation in silvi-pastoral system of a micro watershed in Garhwal Himalaya’, Indian Forester, 123(2): 136–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood, K.K. (2003), Factors affecting Tree Growing in Traditional Agroforestry Systems in Western Himalaya, India, PhD thesis (unpublished), University of Aberdeen, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood, K.K. and Mitchell, C.P. (2004), ‘Do socio-psychological factors matter in agroforestry planning? Lessons from small holder traditional agroforestry systems’, Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 3(2): 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood, K.K. and Sood, S. (2000), ‘Social and agroforestry interventions for socio-economic and ecofriendly development around cement plant and limestone mining area in Western Himalaya’, Journal of Environment and Pollution, 7: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sood, K.K., Soni, J.C. and Singh, B. (2000), ‘Forest resource use of the tribals in Papumpare district of Arunachal Pradesh, India’, NERIWALAM, Proceedings of National Seminar on Resource Management for Self Reliant Agriculture Economy of NE Region, Tezpur, September 2000, Tezpur, pp. 19/4–22/4.

  • Verma, K.S. and Mishra, V.K. (2000), ‘Agroforestry systems’, in L.R. Sharma (ed.), Natural Resources and Development in Himalaya, Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, L.R. and Partap, T. (1992), ‘The experiences of an area based development strategy in Himachal Pradesh, India’, in N.S. Jodha, M. Banskota and T. Partap (eds), Sustainable Mountain Agriculture, Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, B.B. (1997), ‘Human ecological questions for tropical restoration: experiences from planting native upland trees and mangroves in the Philippines’, Forest Ecology and Management, 99(1–2): 275–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum, K.F. (1984), ‘Significance of social organisation and cultural attitudes for agroforestry development’, in K.F. Wiersum (ed.), Viewpoints on Agroforestry, Department of Forestry, Wageningen Agriculture University, Wageningen, pp. 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sood, K.K. Role of social aspects in extent of on-farm tree growing in subsistence agroforestry systems of Western Himalaya. Small-scale Forestry 4, 293–310 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0018-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0018-5

Keywords

Navigation