Abstract
During the first half of the 20th century the Baltic States were independent democratic nations where private forest ownership was practiced. After annexation to the Soviet Union, individuals in the Baltic States lost their ownership rights and collective ownership was introduced. Currently, after the break-up of the Soviet Union, the land restitution process in the forest sector is coming to an end and the ownership pattern as well as tenure rights are settled. A survey was undertaken to investigate the current state of the private forest sector in general, and the needs and expectations of private forest owners (PFO). Results of the study indicated that for private forest owners their forests first of all provide aesthetic and environmental protection values. Lithuanian PFOs lack information of forests and forest management, face extensive bureaucracy and need help in protecting their forests from fires, diseases and timber thieves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L. and Jalas, J. (1968), ‘Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe’, Annales Botanica Fennica, 5: 169–210.
Barrow, E. and Murphree, M. (2001), ‘Community Conservation: From Concept to Practice’, in D. Hulme and M. Murphree (eds), African Wildlife & Livehoods: The promise and performance of community conservation, James Currey, Oxford, pp. 24–37.
Bergmann, S.A. and Bliss, J.C. (2004), ‘Foundations of Cross-Boundary Cooperation: Resource Management at the Public-Private Interface’, Society and Natural Resources, 17(5): 377–393.
Bliss, J.C. and Martin, A.J. (1989), ‘Identifying NIPF Management Motivations with Qualitative Methods’, Forest Science, 35(2): 601–622.
Connelly, N.A., and Brown, T.L. and Decker, D.J. (2003), ‘Factors affecting response rates to natural resource-focused mail surveys: Empirical evidence of declining rates over time’, Society and Natural Resources, 16: 541–549.
Estonian Encyclopaedia Publishers, Latvian Encyclopaedia Publishers, and Lithuanian Encyclopaedia Publishers, (1991), The Baltic States: A Reference Book, Tallinn Book Printers, Tallinn, Estonia.
Gardner, H.S. (1997), Comparative Economic Systems, 2nd edn, Dryden Press, Philadelphia.
Hämet-Ahti, L. (1981), ‘The boreal zone and its biotic subdivision’, Fennia, 159: 69–75.
IPCC, (1990), Climate change, J.T. Houghton et al. (eds), The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kallas, A. (2002), ‘Public forest policy making in post-Communist Estonia’, Forest Policy and Economics, 4: 323–332.
Karppinen, H. (1998), ‘Values and Objectives of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners in Finland’, Silva Fennica, 32(1): 44–54.
Kennedy, J.J., Thomas, J.W. and Glueck, P. (2001), ‘Evolving forestry and rural development beliefs at midpoint and close of the 20th century’, Forest Policy and Economics, 3(1–2): 81–95.
Kurtz, W.B., Lewis, B.J. (1981), ‘Decision-Making Framework for Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners: An Application in the Missouri Ozarks’, Journal of Forestry: 285–288.
Lazdinis, M. (2002), ‘Facilitating sustainable forest development: Comparative analysis of post-soviet forest politics in the Baltic States’, PhD Dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois.
Lazdinis, M. and Dudutis, D. (2001), ‘Reform of the Lithuania’s Forest Sector Administration’, Baltic Timber Journal, 2(5): 10–13.
Lönnstedt, L. (1989), ‘Goals and Cutting Decisions of Private Small Forest Owners’, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 4: 259–265.
Lönnstedt, L. (1998), ‘Calculating Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners’ Cuttings’, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13: 215–223.
Lönnstedt, L. and Rutegård, G. (2000), ‘Cases about Financing Acquisitions of NIPF Estates. A Comparison with Dynamic, Multi-Stage Optimisation Model Solutions’, Manuscript, Department of Forest Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
Lönnstedt, L. and Svensson, J. (2000), ‘Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners’ Risk Preferences’, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15: 651–660.
Ministry of Environment and Forest Survey Service, (2003), Lithuanian Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, State Forest Survey Service, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Mizaraité, D. (2001), ‘Privačių miškų savininkų ūkininkavimo tikslai, problemos ir poreikiai bei juos lemiantys veiksniai (Objectives, problems and needs of the private forest owners as well as dependence on various factors)’, Miškininkystè, 1(49): 33–46.
NTKD, (State Land Cadastre of Lithuania database on private forest owners), (2003), State Land Cadastre and Register, Vilnius.
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press.
Patton, M.Q. (1987), How to use qualitative methods in evaluation, SAGE Publication, Newbury Park, California.
Reviere, R., Berkowitz, S., Carter, C.C., and Ferguson, C.G. (1996), ‘Introduction: Setting the Stage’, in Needs Assessment: A Creative and Practical Guide for Social Scientists, Taylor and Francis, Washington DC, pp. 1–12.
Sayer, J.A. and Campbell, B.M. (2003), ‘Research to integrate productivity enhancement, environmental protection and human development’, in B.M. Campbell and J.A. Sayer (eds), Integrated natural resource management: linking productivity, environment and development, CABI Publishing and Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), pp. 1–14.
Ticknor, W.D. (1993), ‘Sustainable forestry: redefining the role of forest management’, in G.H. Aplet, N. Johnson, J.T. Olson and V.A. Sample (eds), Defining Sustainable Forestry, Island Press, Washington DC, pp. 260–269.
Törnqvist, T. (1997), ‘The Socio-Economic Structure of Small-Scale Forest Ownership in Sweden’, Commonwealth Forestry Review, 76(1): 37–40.
Vencloviene, J. (1999), Programų paketo ‘Statistika’ taikymas aplinkos tyrimų duomenų analizei (unpublished), Vytauto Didziojo Uiniversteto. pp. 2–25.
Vizlenskas, D. (2004), ‘2003 m. Lietuvos medienos rinkos analize (Lithuanian timber market analysis for the year 2003)’, Baltijos miskai ir mediena (In Lithuanian) 1(3): 56–63.
Witkin, B.R. and Altschuld, J.W. (1995), Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, p. 302.
Ziegler, C.E. (1990), Environmental Policy in the USSR, University of Massachussetts Press, Amherst.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pivoriūnas, A., Lazdinis, M. Needs of private forest owners in the context of changing political systems: Lithuania as a case study. Small-scale Forestry 3, 191–202 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0014-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0014-1