Abstract
An extremely fragmented timber supply, high harvesting costs, low profitability, high subsidies and insufficient competitiveness characterise forest enterprises in Switzerland. In a case study using a forest district in the state of Solothurn as an example, it was sought to identify strengths and weaknesses of wood production and to formulate possible improvement opportunities. The results indicate that there is considerable potential for industry rationalisation. The greatest handicaps are the small sized forest holdings, excessive numbers of staff, insufficient use of modern harvesting technology and costly business administration. The most eminent of the proposed improvement measures are those which aim to increase concentration of timber supplies and reduce production costs. These include greater centralising of timber sales as well as planning and steering of production, making full use of modern harvesting systems, reducing transaction costs, supporting administration, planning and steering of wood production with modern information technology and reducing input on stand tending. In principle, amelioration can be best achieved by close cooperation with neighbours or even merger of enterprises. Consequently, there is a need for related business tasks to be combined in functions. The paramount prerequisite for success is the willingness and readiness of all affected stakeholders to make changes. The situation described is typical for Swiss forestry and the proposed solutions could well be used as models for a wide range of Swiss forest districts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BUWAL (Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft) (ed.) (2003), Wald und Holz in der Schweiz, BUWAL, Bern.
Haberfellner, R. (ed.) (1999), Systems engineering: Methodik und Praxis, 10th edn, Industrielle Organisation, Zürich.
Hammer, M. and Champy, J. (1993), Reengineering the Corporation — a Manifesto for Business Revolution, Harper Business, New York.
Jaakko Pöÿry Consulting (2003), Logistikstudie Schweizer Wald und Holzindustrie, holz 21, Bern.
Kraft, D. (2000), ‘Die Prozesskette Holz: Leistungs und Wertschöpfungsprozess eines Forstunternehmers’, Forst und Holz, 55(5): 123–130.
Lombriser, R. and Abplanalp, P. (1997), Strategisches Management. Visionen entwickeln, Strategien umsetzen, Erfolgspotentiale aufbauen, Versus, Zürich.
Specker, A. (2001), Modellierung von Informationssystemen — ein methodischer Leitfaden zur Projektabwicklung, vdf ETHZ, Zürich.
Seidl, I., Tisdell, C.A. and Harrison, S. (2002), ‘Environmental regulation of land use and public compensation: principles, and Swiss and Australian examples’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 20: 699–716.
Steinlin, J., Schelbert, H. and Crettol, G. (1975), Gesamtkonzeption für eine schweizerische Wald und Holzwirtschaftspolitik, Eidg. Material und Drucksachenzentrale, Bern.
Strohm, O. and Ulich, E. (eds) (1997), Unternehmen arbeitspsychologisch bewerten. Ein Mehr-Ebenen-Ansatz unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Mensch, Technik und Organisation. vdf ETHZ, Zürich.
Williamson, O.E. (2000), ‘The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595–613.
WSL (Eidg. Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft) and BUWAL (Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft) (eds) (2001), Lothar der Orkan 1999, Ereignisanalyse, WSL and BUWAL, Birmensdorf, Bern.
WVS (Waldwirtschaft Verband Schweiz), (1995–2000), Kennziffern und graphische Auswertungen der Betriebsabrechnung, Jahresergebnisse 1995–2000, WVS, Solothurn.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oswald, K., Riechsteiner, D., Thees, O. et al. Reorganisation of wood production for improved performance: a swiss forest district case study. Small-scale Forestry 3, 143–160 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0011-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-004-0011-4