Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ecosystem management in the Southeast United States: Interest of forest landowners in joint management across ownerships

  • Published:
Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the south-east United States, 70% of the forest area is privately owned, by an estimated 5 M landholders. If ecosystem or landscape-level management is to work, cooperation across private ownerships is essential. As a first step in garnering cooperation among landowners, a mail survey was carried out to understand their characteristics, attitudes, beliefs and interest in ecosystem management. A specific area of the Coastal Plain of South Carolina, typical of rural forest-dominated areas of this region, was chosen as the study site. Forestry-related uses, specifically timber production, are the main reasons why over half the respondents own their land. Only one-third of the respondents are familiar with the concept of ecosystem management. However, about 70% are interested in learning more about joint management with other landowners. The major concerns about participating in joint management are loss of land and timber values. Most of the landowners who would participate in a landscape corridor system, for example, want to maintain control of their land rights and limit outside intervention in the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birch, T. (1997), ‘Private forest landowners of the Southern United States 1994’, USDA Forest Service, Resource Bulletin NE-138. Radnor, PA.

  • Bliss, J., Nepal, S., Brooks, R. Jr and Larsen, M. (1994), ‘Forestry community or granfallon?: Do forestry owners share publics’ views?’, Journal of Forestry, 92(9): 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourke L. and Luloff, A. (1994), ‘Attitudes toward the management of nonindustrial private forest land”, Society and Natural Resources, 7(5): 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick, S.H., Snyder, L. and Tyson, B. (1996), ‘Selling stewardship within the community: a social marketing approach’, in M, Baughman, ed., Symposium on Nonindustrial Private Forests: Learning from the Past, Prospects for the Future, Society of American Forestry, Washington. D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson M., Yarrow, D., Roberts, S., Guynn, D. Jr and Kuhns, M. (1996), ‘Nonindustrial private forest owners and ecosystem management: can they work together?’, Journal of Forestry, 94(6): 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S.M. and Kitteridge, D.B. (1996), ‘Ecosystem-based management on multiple nonindustrial private forest ownerships’, Journal of Forestry, 94(2): 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D.A. (1978), Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher R.A. and Reed, A.S. (1996), ‘Extending forest management with volunteers: the Master Woodland Manager Project’, in M. Baughman, ed., Symposium on Nonindustrial Private Forests: Learning from the Past, Prospects for the Future, Principal Sponsor Society of American Forestry, Washington. D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R.E. (1994), ‘What is ecosystem management?’, Conservation Biology, 8(1): 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones S.B., Luloff, A. and Finley, J. (1995), ‘Another look at PFLs: Facing our ‘myths’, Journal of Forestry, 93(9): 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsinko A., Stevens, H. and Nodine, S. (1987), ‘Nonindustrial private forest lands and landowners in South Carolina’, Clemson University Department of Forest Resources, Forest Research Series, Report No. 43, Clemson, SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moote, M. and Cortner, H. (1994), Principles of Ecosystem Management, WRRC, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1992), Conserving Biodiversity: a Research Agenda for Development Agencies, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, E. M. (1993), ‘VIPS take to the woods’, American Forests, 99 (11/12): 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickenbach M. G., Kitteridge, D.B., Dennis, D. and Stevens, T. (1998), ‘Ecosystem management: capturing the concept for woodland owners’, Journal of Forestry, 96(4): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, A. (1994), ‘Building partnerships for ecosystem management on mixed ownership landscapes’, Journal of Forestry, 90(3): 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelford, V. (1933), ‘The preservation of natural biotic communities’, Ecology, 14: 240–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaffee, S.L., Phillips, A.F., Frentz, I.C., Hardy, P.W., Maleki, S.M. and Thorpe, B.E., eds. (1996), Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience, Island Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Forest Resources, Pennsylvania State University, 7 Ferguson Building, 16802, University Park, PA

    Michael G. Jacobson (Assistant Professor of Forest Resources)

Authors
  1. Michael G. Jacobson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobson, M.G. Ecosystem management in the Southeast United States: Interest of forest landowners in joint management across ownerships. Small-scale Forestry 1, 71–92 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-002-0006-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-002-0006-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation