Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ecosystem management and nonindustrial private forest landowners in Washington State, USA

  • Published:
Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Washington’s non-industrial private forest (NIPF) landowners control 1.2 M ha, or nearly 20%, of the forestland in Washington State. Results of a mail survey suggest that educated and informed NIPF landowners are more likely to show interest in ecosystem-based management programs. NIPF respondents in Washington State indicated an appreciation for the temporal vision and landscape perspective crucial to understanding the foundation of ecosystem management. It is concluded that public agencies need to involve private landowners in ecosystem-based projects by using a more ‘place’ based cross-boundary management approach. NIPF landowners must be actively involved in the decision-making so that the process, for them, is one of self-governance. Providing landowners with opportunities for education and assistance may offer the best prospects for achieving ecosystem management objectives across diverse ownerships

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, T. G. (2000), Landscape ecology and ecosystems management, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatner, K. A., Baumgartner, D.M. and Quackenbush, L.R. (1991), ‘NIPF use of landowner assistance and education programs in Washington State’, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 6(4): 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, M. W. (1993), ‘Socially acceptable’ forestry: what does it imply for ecosystem management?’, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 8(4): 116–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, M. W., Yarrow, D.T., Roberts, S.D., Guynn Jr D.C. and Kuhns, M.R. (1996), ‘Nonindustrial private forest owners and ecosystem management: can they work together?’, Journal of Forestry, 94(6): 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S. M. a. D. B. K. (1996), ‘Ecosystem-based management on multiple NIPF ownerships’, Journal of Forestry, 94(2): 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrill, J.G. (1998), ‘The environmental self and sense of place: communication foundations for ecosystem management’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(3): 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. (1994), ‘What is ecosystem management?’, Conservation Biology, 8: 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irland, L. C. (1994), ‘Getting from here to there: Implementing ecosystem management on the ground’, Journal of Forestry, 92(8): 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. B., Luloff, A.E. and Finley, J.C. (1995), ‘Another look at NIPFS’s: facing our myths’, Journal of Forestry, 93(9): 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D. (2000), ‘Draft Washington Timber Harvest 1998’, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, C. D., Bassett, P. M. and Yeary, G. (1992), ‘Timber resource statistics for western Washington. Portland’, OR, US Forest Service PNW-RB-191.

  • McGliney, J. and Haines, S.G. (1994), ‘Endangered species management: the art of intelligent tinkering’, Journal of Forestry, 92(5): 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, N., Bassett, P.M. and MacLean, C.D. (1995), ‘Timber resource statistics for eastern Washington. Portland’, OR, US Forest Service PNW-RB-201.

  • Nelson, G. (1996), ‘Forward’, in S.L. Yaffee, B.E. Thorpe, eds., Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience, Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raedeke, A. H., Rikoon, J.S. and Nilon, C.H. (2001), ‘Ecosystem management and landowner concern about regulations: A case study in the Missouri Ozarks’, Society and Natural Resources, 14: 741–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickenbach, M. G., Kittredge, D.B., Dennis, D. and Stevens, T. (1998), ‘Ecosystem management: capturing the concept for woodland owners’, Journal of Forestry, 96(4): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. D. (1996), ‘Forest landowner focus groups’, Robinson Research Inc., Spokane, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salwasser, H. (1990), ‘Gaining perspective: Forestry for the future’, Journal of Forestry, 88(11): 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salwasser, H. (1994), ‘Ecosystem Management: can it sustain diversity and productivity?’, Journal of Forestry, 92(8): 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sample, V. A. (1994), ‘Building partnerships for ecosystem management on mixed ownership landscapes’, Journal of Forestry, 92(8): 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2000) (revised), 1997 resources inventory. http://www.nhq.nres.usda.gov/NRI/1997/

  • WA-DNR (1999), Washington Timber Harvest Report 1999, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington State Department of Revenue (WSDOR) (2000), ‘Quarterly Business Review’, Olympia, Washington.

  • Weber, E. P. (2000), ‘A new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement’, Society and Natural Resources, 13:237–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaffee, S. L. (1996 a), ‘Ecosystem management in practice: the importance of human institutions’, Ecological Applications, 63(3): 724–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaffee, S. L. (1996 b), ‘Assessment’, in S.L. Yaffee, A.F. Phillips, I.C. Frentz, P.W. Hardy, S.M. Maleki, and B.E. Thorpe, eds., Ecosystem management in the United States: An assessment of current experience, Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Creighton, J.H., Baumgartner, D.M. & Blatner, K.A. Ecosystem management and nonindustrial private forest landowners in Washington State, USA. Small-scale Forestry 1, 55–69 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-002-0005-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-002-0005-z

Keywords

Navigation