Abstract
Washington’s non-industrial private forest (NIPF) landowners control 1.2 M ha, or nearly 20%, of the forestland in Washington State. Results of a mail survey suggest that educated and informed NIPF landowners are more likely to show interest in ecosystem-based management programs. NIPF respondents in Washington State indicated an appreciation for the temporal vision and landscape perspective crucial to understanding the foundation of ecosystem management. It is concluded that public agencies need to involve private landowners in ecosystem-based projects by using a more ‘place’ based cross-boundary management approach. NIPF landowners must be actively involved in the decision-making so that the process, for them, is one of self-governance. Providing landowners with opportunities for education and assistance may offer the best prospects for achieving ecosystem management objectives across diverse ownerships
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, T. G. (2000), Landscape ecology and ecosystems management, Cooperative Extension Service, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY.
Blatner, K. A., Baumgartner, D.M. and Quackenbush, L.R. (1991), ‘NIPF use of landowner assistance and education programs in Washington State’, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 6(4): 90–94.
Brunson, M. W. (1993), ‘Socially acceptable’ forestry: what does it imply for ecosystem management?’, Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 8(4): 116–19.
Brunson, M. W., Yarrow, D.T., Roberts, S.D., Guynn Jr D.C. and Kuhns, M.R. (1996), ‘Nonindustrial private forest owners and ecosystem management: can they work together?’, Journal of Forestry, 94(6): 14–21.
Campbell, S. M. a. D. B. K. (1996), ‘Ecosystem-based management on multiple NIPF ownerships’, Journal of Forestry, 94(2): 24–29.
Cantrill, J.G. (1998), ‘The environmental self and sense of place: communication foundations for ecosystem management’, Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(3): 301–318.
Grumbine, R. E. (1994), ‘What is ecosystem management?’, Conservation Biology, 8: 27–38.
Irland, L. C. (1994), ‘Getting from here to there: Implementing ecosystem management on the ground’, Journal of Forestry, 92(8): 12–17.
Jones, S. B., Luloff, A.E. and Finley, J.C. (1995), ‘Another look at NIPFS’s: facing our myths’, Journal of Forestry, 93(9): 41–44.
Larson, D. (2000), ‘Draft Washington Timber Harvest 1998’, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington.
MacLean, C. D., Bassett, P. M. and Yeary, G. (1992), ‘Timber resource statistics for western Washington. Portland’, OR, US Forest Service PNW-RB-191.
McGliney, J. and Haines, S.G. (1994), ‘Endangered species management: the art of intelligent tinkering’, Journal of Forestry, 92(5): 20–23.
McKay, N., Bassett, P.M. and MacLean, C.D. (1995), ‘Timber resource statistics for eastern Washington. Portland’, OR, US Forest Service PNW-RB-201.
Nelson, G. (1996), ‘Forward’, in S.L. Yaffee, B.E. Thorpe, eds., Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience, Island Press, Washington D.C.
Raedeke, A. H., Rikoon, J.S. and Nilon, C.H. (2001), ‘Ecosystem management and landowner concern about regulations: A case study in the Missouri Ozarks’, Society and Natural Resources, 14: 741–59.
Rickenbach, M. G., Kittredge, D.B., Dennis, D. and Stevens, T. (1998), ‘Ecosystem management: capturing the concept for woodland owners’, Journal of Forestry, 96(4): 18–24.
Robinson, W. D. (1996), ‘Forest landowner focus groups’, Robinson Research Inc., Spokane, Washington.
Salwasser, H. (1990), ‘Gaining perspective: Forestry for the future’, Journal of Forestry, 88(11): 32–38.
Salwasser, H. (1994), ‘Ecosystem Management: can it sustain diversity and productivity?’, Journal of Forestry, 92(8): 6–10.
Sample, V. A. (1994), ‘Building partnerships for ecosystem management on mixed ownership landscapes’, Journal of Forestry, 92(8): 41–44.
USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2000) (revised), 1997 resources inventory. http://www.nhq.nres.usda.gov/NRI/1997/
WA-DNR (1999), Washington Timber Harvest Report 1999, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington.
Washington State Department of Revenue (WSDOR) (2000), ‘Quarterly Business Review’, Olympia, Washington.
Weber, E. P. (2000), ‘A new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement’, Society and Natural Resources, 13:237–59.
Yaffee, S. L. (1996 a), ‘Ecosystem management in practice: the importance of human institutions’, Ecological Applications, 63(3): 724–27.
Yaffee, S. L. (1996 b), ‘Assessment’, in S.L. Yaffee, A.F. Phillips, I.C. Frentz, P.W. Hardy, S.M. Maleki, and B.E. Thorpe, eds., Ecosystem management in the United States: An assessment of current experience, Island Press, Washington D.C., pp. 3–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Creighton, J.H., Baumgartner, D.M. & Blatner, K.A. Ecosystem management and nonindustrial private forest landowners in Washington State, USA. Small-scale Forestry 1, 55–69 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-002-0005-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-002-0005-z