Skip to main content
Log in

Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: What’s in a name?

  • Published:
Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bawden, R. (2001), Forestry investment in New Zealand, paper presented at the International Symposium on Economic Sustainability of Small-Scale Forestry, Joensuu, Finland, 20–26 March.

  • Emtage, N.F., Harrison, S.R. and J.L. Herbohn (2001), ‘Landholder Attitudes to and Participation in Farm Forestry Activities in Sub-Tropical and Tropical Eastern Australia’, in Harrison, S.R. and Herbohn, J.L., Sustainable Farm Forestry in the Tropics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S.R., Herbohn, J.L., Dart, P.J. and Brown, S.M. (2000), ‘Sustainable small-scale forestry in the Philippines’, in S.R. Harrison, J.L. Herbohn and K.F. Herbohn, eds., Sustainable Small-scale Forestry: Socio-economic Analysis and Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, J.A., ed. (1998), The Dictionary of Forestry, Society of American Foresters and CABI Publishing, Bethesda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbohn, J.L. (2001), ‘Prospects for small-scale forestry in Australia’, in A. Niskanen and J. Vayrynen, eds., Economic Sustainability of Small-Scale Forestry, EFI Proceedings No. 36, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, G.P. (2000), ‘Policies for small-scale forestry in the United Kingdom’, in S.R. Harrison, J.L. Herbohn and K.F. Herbohn, eds., Sustainable Small-scale Forestry: Socio-economic Analysis and Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackobson, M. (2001), School of Forest Resources, Pennsylvania State University, personal communication.

  • Lillandt, M. (2001), ‘Forest Management Association — a major tool to promote economic sustainability of family forestry’, in A. Niskanen and J. Vayrynen, eds., Economic Sustainability of Small-Scale Forestry, EFI Proceedings No. 36, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp. 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangaoang, E.O. (2002), Head, Department of Forestry, Leyte State University, personal communication.

  • Mangaoang, E.O. (2002), ‘A Forester’s Perspective of the Socio-Economic Information Requirements for Forestry in Leyte’, in S. Harrison, J. Herbohn, E. Mangaoang and J. Vanclay, eds., Socio-Economic Research Methods in Forestry: A Training Manual, Rainforest CRC, in process, Ch. 1.

  • MOEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests) (1998), Annual Report 1997–98, http://www.nic.in/envfor/report/9798/con_nat.http.

  • Nain, W., (1998), ‘Germany’, in P. Hyttinen and T. Kallio, eds., Cost Accountancy in European Farm Forest Enterprises, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp. 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, A. and Sekot, W., eds. (2001), Guidelines for establishing farm forestry accountancy networks: MOSEFA, European Forest Institute Research Report 12. Brill. Leiden, Boston, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ota, I. (2001), ‘The economic situation of small-scale forestry in Japan’, in A. Niskanen and J. Vayrynen, eds., Economic Sustainability of Small-Scale Forestry, EFI Proceedings No. 36, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. (1996), ‘Is it industrial forestry, farm forestry or agroforestry?’, Trees and Natural Resources, June, pp. 5–7.

  • Sekot, W. (2001), ‘Analysis of profitability of small-scale farm forestry (SSFF) by means of a forest accountancy data network — Austran experiences and results’, in A. Niskanen and J. Vayrynen, eds., Economic Sustainability of Small-Scale Forestry, EFI Proceedings No. 36, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp. 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenqi, G. and Harrison, S.R. (2000), ‘Development of forestry including small-scale forestry in China’, in S.R. Harrison, J.L. Herbohn and K.F. Herbohn, eds., Sustainable Small-scale Forestry: Socio-economic Analysis and Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 190–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyynelä, T. and Niskanen, A. (2000). ‘Communal management and social benefits of woodland resources in Zimbabwe’, in P. Virtanen and M. Nummelin, eds., Forests, Chiefs and Peasants in Africa: Local Management of Natural Resources in Tanzania, Zimbabwe and Mozambique, Silva Carelica No. 34, the University of Joensuu, Joensuu, pp. 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, Y. and Harrison, S.R. (2000), ‘Non-Industrial Private Forestry in the United States of America’, in S.R. Harrison, J.L. Herbohn and K.F. Herbohn, eds., Sustainable Small-scale Forestry: Socio-economic Analysis and Policy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrison, S., Herbohn, J. & Niskanen, A. Non-industrial, smallholder, small-scale and family forestry: What’s in a name?. Small-scale Forestry 1, 1–11 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-002-0001-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-002-0001-3

Keywords

Navigation