Sophia

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 139–145 | Cite as

Logic and Philosophy of Religion

Article

Abstract

This paper introduces a special issue on logic and philosophy of religion in this journal (Sophia). After discussing the role played by logic in the philosophy of religion along with classical developments, we present the basic motivation for this special issue accompanied by an exposition of its content.

Keywords

Logic Philosophy of religion Arguments for and against the existence of God Analysis of the religious concepts World Congress on Logic and Religion 

References

  1. Adams, R. (1971). The logical structure of Anselm’s arguments. The Philosophical Review, 80, 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akrami, M. From logic in Islam to Islamic logic.: 61–83, 2017.Google Scholar
  3. Archambaut, J. (2017). Monotonic and non-monotonic embeddings of Anselm’s proof. Logica Universalis, 11, 234–236.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, J. (1972). The ontological argument. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baziau, J-Y; Silvestre, R. (eds.) Special Issue on Logic and Religion. Logica Universalis, volume 11, Issue 1, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. Benzmüller, C., Weber, L., & Paleo, B. W. (2017). Computer-assisted analysis of the Anderson–Hájek ontological controversy. Logica Universalis, 11, 53–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beran, O. (2017). Misunderstanding the Talk(s) of the Divine: Theodicy in the Wittgensteinian Tradition. Sophia 56. doi:10.1007/s11841-017-0600-2.
  8. Bilimoria, P. (2017). Thinking negation in early Hinduism and classical Indian philosophy. Logica Universalis, 11, 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, E. (2017). Thomas Aquinas on Logic, Being, and Power, and Contemporary Problems for Divine Omnipotence. Sophia 56. doi:10.1007/s11841-017-0604-y.
  11. Desclés, J.-P. (2017). A logical analysis of the Anselm’s Unum argumentum (from Proslogion). Logica Universalis, 11, 115–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansson, S. (2000). Formalization in philosophy. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 6, 162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horsten, L., & Douven, I. (2008). Formal methods in the philosophy of science. Studia Logica, 89, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horsten, L., & Pettigrew, R. (2011). Mathematical methods in philosophy. In L. Horsten (Ed.), The continuum companion to philosophical logic (pp. 14–26). London: Continuum Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Klima, G. (2000). Saint Anselm’s proof: A problem of reference, intentional identity and mutual understanding. In G. Holmström-Hintikka (Ed.), Medieval philosophy and modern times (pp. 69–87). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lenzen, W. (2017). Leibniz’s ontological proof of the existence of god and the problem of impossible objects. Logica Universalis, 11, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Molto, D. (2017). The Logical Problem of the Trinity and the Strong Theory of Relative Identity. Sophia 56. doi:10.1007/s11841-017-0612-y.
  18. Oppenheimer, P., & Zalta, E. (1991). On the logic of the ontological argument. In J. Tomblin (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives 5: The philosophy of religion. Atascadero: Ridgview Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rodrigues, C. (2017). The vagueness of the muse—the logic of peirce’s humble argument for the reality of God. Sophia 56. doi:10.1007/s11841-017-0610-0.
  20. Russell, B. (1914). Our knowledge of the external world. Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Silvestre, R. (2017a). Karma theory, determinism, fatalism and freedom of will. Logica Universalis, 11, 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Silvestre, R. (2017b). On the concept of theodicy. Sophia 56. doi:10.1007/s11841-017-0609-6.
  23. Sobel, J. (2004). Logic and theism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. van Benthem, J. (2006). Logic in philosophy. In D. Jacquette (Ed.), Philosophy of logic (pp. 65–100). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  25. Watson, J. (2017). The End of Eternity. Sophia 56. doi:10.1007/s11841-017-0590-0.
  26. Williamson, T. (2017). Model-Building in Philosophy. In: Blackford, R. and Broderick, D. (eds.) Philosophy’s Future: The Problem of Philosophical Progress, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781119210115.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal University of Campina GrandeCampina GrandeBrazil
  2. 2.Federal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations