Sophia

pp 1–18 | Cite as

God’s Purpose for the Universe and the Problem of Animal Suffering

Article

Abstract

Proponents of the problem of animal suffering state that the great amount of animal death and suffering found in Earth’s natural history provides evidence against the truth of theism. In particular, philosophers such as Paul Draper have argued that regardless of the antecedent probability of theism and naturalism, animal suffering provides positive evidence for the truth of naturalism over theism. While theists have attempted to provide answers to the problem of animal suffering, almost none have argued that animal suffering and death can be seen as positive evidence for theism. This essay will discuss several arguments from the writings of Thomas Aquinas that can be used to show that animal suffering and death are to be expected in theistic universes. In the first section, I discuss evidential arguments for naturalism from animal suffering. Next, I provide an overview of Aquinas’ arguments, particularly in Book II of the Summa Contra Gentiles. After this, I discuss the implications these arguments have for theistic universes. Finally, I conclude that these arguments refute evidential arguments for naturalism from animal suffering and also provide evidence that favors theism.

Keywords

Problem of animal suffering Thomas Aquinas Paul Draper Hierarchy of beings Evidential problem of evil 

References

  1. Aquinas, T. (1947). Summa Theologica. (First complete American ed.). (Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Trans.). New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar
  2. Aquinas, T. (1975). Summa Contra Gentiles. Translated by A.C. Pegis, J.F. Anderson, V.J. Bourke, and C.J. O’Neil. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  3. Creegan, N. H. (2013). Animal suffering and the problem of evil. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darwin, C. (1969). In N. Barlow (Ed.), The autobiography of Charles Darwin. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, B. (2006). The reality of god and the problem of evil. New York: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
  6. Dembski, W. A. (2009). The end of Christianity: finding a good God in an evil world. Nashville: B&H Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Dougherty, T. (2014). The problem of animal pain: a theodicy for all creatures great and small. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Draper, P. (1989). Pain and pleasure: an evidential problem for theists. Noûs, 23(3), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Draper, P. (2004). Cosmic fine-tuning and terrestrial suffering: parallel problems for naturalism and theism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 41(4), 311–321.Google Scholar
  10. Draper, P. (2012a). Christian theism and life on earth. In J. B. Stump & A. G. Padgett (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to science and Christianity (pp. 306–316). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Draper, P. (2012b). Darwin’s argument from evil. In Y. Nagasawa (Ed.), Scientific approaches to the philosophy of religion (pp. 49–70). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Draper, P. (2015). Evolution and the problem of evil. In M. Rea & L. P. Pojman (Eds.), Philosophy of religion: an anthology (7th ed., pp. 271–282). Stamford: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  13. Francescotti, R. (2013). The problem of animal pain and suffering. In J. P. McBrayer & D. Howard-Snyder (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the problem of evil (pp. 113–127). Somerset: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Garcia, L. (2009). Moral perfection. In T. P. Flint & M. C. Rea (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology (pp. 221–232). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Garrigou-Lagrange, R. (1949). God, his existence and his nature: a Thomistic solution of certain agnostic antinomies (Vol. 2) (5th ed.). Translated by D.B. Rose. St. Louis: B. Herder.Google Scholar
  16. Geach, P. T. (1956). Good and evil. Analysis, 17(2), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hull, D. L. (1991). The God of the Galápagos. Nature, 352(6335), 485–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kretzmann, N. (1999). The metaphysics of creation: Aquinas’s natural theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mackie, J. L. (1955). Evil and omnipotence. Mind, 64(254), 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murray, M. J. (2008). Nature red in tooth and claw: theism and the problem of animal suffering. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rowe, W. L. (1979). The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(4), 335–341.Google Scholar
  22. Russell, B. (1997). Religion and science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, Q. (1991). An atheological argument from evil natural laws. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 29(3), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Southgate, C. (2008). The groaning of creation: God, evolution, and the problem of evil. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Plains CollegeLevellandUSA

Personalised recommendations