Adams, M. M. (1999). Horrendous evils and the goodness of God. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Adams, R. M. (1985). In J. Tomberlin & P. Van Inwagen (Eds.), Plantinga on the problem of evil, in Alvin Plantinga (pp. 225–255). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chisholm, R. M. (1990). In M. Adams & R. Adams (Eds.), The defeat of good and evil, in the problem of evil (pp. 53–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hansson, S. (2000). Formalization in philosophy. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 6, 162–175.
Hasker, W. (1988). Suffering, soul-making, and salvation. International Philosophical Quarterly, 28, 3–19.
Hempel, C. (1945). Studies in the logic of confirmation. Mind, 54(1–26), 97–121.
Hick, J. (1981). In S. Davis (Ed.), An Irenaean theodicy, in encountering evil: Live options in theodicy (pp. 39–52). Edinburgh: T and T Clark.
Horsten, L., & Pettigrew, R. (2011). In L. Horstein (Ed.), Mathematical methods in philosophy, in the continuum companion to philosophical logic (pp. 14–26). London: Continuum Publishing.
Langtry, B. (1998). Structures of greater good theodicies: the objection from alternative goods. Sophia, 37, 1–17.
Makinson, D. (1994). In D. Gabbay et al. (Eds.), General patterns in non-monotonic reasoning, in handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (Vol. Volume 3, pp. 35–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peterson, M. (1983). Recent work on the problem of evil. American Philosophical Quarterly, 20, 321–339.
Pike, N. (1963). Hume on evil. The philosophical Review, 72, 180–197.
Plantinga, A. (1974). The nature of necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plantinga, A. (1977). God, freedom, and evil. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Plantinga, A. (1979). The probabilistic argument from evil. Philosophical Studies, 35, 1–53.
Rowe, W. (1979). The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 335–341.
Rowe, W. (1988). Evil and theodicy. Philosophical Topics, 16, 119–132.
Rowe, W. (Ed.). (2001). God and the problem of evil. Oxford: Blackwell Press.
Ruben, D. (1990). Explaining explanation. New York: Routledge.
Salmon, W. (1989). In P. Kitcher & W. Salmon (Eds.), Four decades of scientific explanation, in Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol XII, scientific explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schuurman, H. (1993). Two concepts of theodicy. American Philosophical Quarterly, 30, 209–221.
Silvestre, R. (2010). Induction and plausibility. Berlin: Lambert Academic Publishing.
Swinburne, R. (1995). Theodicy, our well-being, and God’s rights. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 38, 75–91.
Swinburne, R. (1996). In D. Howard-Snyder (Ed.), Some major strands of theodicy, in the evidential argument from evil (pp. 30–48). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Tooley, M. 2002. The Problem of Evil, in The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, ed. E. Zalta, Winter 2002 edition.
Trakakis, N. (2007). The god beyond belief: in defense of William Rowe’s evidential argument from evil. Dordrecht: Springer.
Van Benthem, J. 2006. Logic in philosophy, in philosophy of logic, ed. D. Jacquette, Amsterdam: North-Holland: 65–100.
Van Inwagen, P. (1991). The problem of evil, the problem of air, and the problem of silence. Philosophical Perspectives, 5, 135–165.
Van Inwagen, P. (2000). The argument from particular horrendous evils. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 74, 65–80.
Williamson, T. (2017). In R. Blackford et al. (Eds.), Model-building in philosophy, to appear in: philosophy’s future: the problem of philosophical progress. Oxford: Wiley.
Wykstra, S. (1984). The Humean obstacle to evidential arguments from suffering: on avoiding the evils of appearance. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 16, 73–93.