Absence: An Indo-Analytic Inquiry

Abstract

Two of the most important contributions that Bimal Krishna Matilal made to comparative philosophy are his (1968) doctoral dissertation The Navya-Nyāya Doctrine of Negation: The Semantics and Ontology of Negative Statements in Navya-Nyāya Philosophy and his (1986) classic: Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowing. In this essay, we aim to carry forward the work of Bimal K. Matilal by showing how ideas in classical Indian philosophy concerning absence and perception are relevant to recent debates in Anglo-analytic philosophy. In particular, we focus on the recent debate in the philosophy of perception centering on the perception of absence. In her Seeing Absence, Anya Farennikova (2013) argues for the thesis that we literally see absences. Her thesis is quite novel within the contexts of the traditions that she engages: analytical philosophy of perception, phenomenology, and cognitive neuroscience. In those traditions there is hardly any exploration of the epistemology of absence. By contrast, this is not the case in classical Indian philosophy where the debate over the ontological and epistemological status of absence (abhāva) is longstanding and quite engaging. In what follows, we engage Farennikova’s arguments, and those of John-Rémy Martin and Jérome Dokic in their (2013) response to her work. Using the work of Matilal (1968, 1986), Bilimoria (2015) and Shaw (2016) we show that there are several engaging ideas that can be taken from Indian philosophy into the terrain explored by Farennikova, and Martin & Dokic. Our aim is to provide an updated comparative engagement on absence and its perception for the purposes of enhancing future discussions within global philosophy. However, we do not aim to do this merely by focusing on the history of primary texts or on twentieth century commentary on primary texts. Instead, we hope to show that the living tradition of Indian philosophy that Matilal embodied carries forward in his students and colleagues as they revive, revise, and extend Indian philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Martin and Dokic (2013: 1–2) for this account of the perceptual view.

  2. 2.

    See Martin and Dokic (2013: 1–2) for this account of the cognitive view.

  3. 3.

    See Farennikova (2013: 441–443)

  4. 4.

    See Farennikova (2013: 442–444).

  5. 5.

    See Farennikova (2013: 444).

  6. 6.

    See Martin and Dokic (2013: 4–6). This is our reconstruction of their argument.

  7. 7.

    J. L. Shaw is responsible for this point.

  8. 8.

    J. L. Shaw translated the following arguments into English from the original Bengali-Sanskrit Mānameyodayaḥ.

References

Primary

  1. Bhāāpariccheda of Viśvanātha Nyāyapañcānana (c. 1650 CE) with his Siddhānta-muktāvalī, trans by Swami Madhavananda, Kolkata (Calcutta):  Advaita Ashrama, 2004.

  2. Kumārila Bhaṭṭa (1985) Ślokavārtika. Translated by Ganganatha Jha. Asiatic Society of Bengal, Calcutta.

  3. Nārāyaṇa Bhaṭṭa [of the Bhāṭṭa School]. (1989) Mānameyodaya. Translated by Śrīdīnanātha Tripathī, Sanskrit College, Calcutta.

Secondary

  1. Bilimoria, P. (2015). Negation (abhāva), non-existents, and a distinctive pramāṇa in the Nyāya-Mīmāṃsā. In P. Bilimoria & M. Hemmingsen (Eds.), Comparative philosophy and J. L. Shaw (pp. 183–202–183–140). Dordrecht: Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dasti, M. (2012). Parasitism and Disjunctivism in Nyāya epistemology. Philosophy East and West, 62(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dasti, M., & Phillips, S. (2010). Pramāṇa are factive—a response to Jonardon Ganeri. Philosophy East & West, 60(4), 535–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Farennikova, A. (2013). Seeing absence. Philosophical Studies, 166, 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ganeri, J. (2007). Review of Epistemology of Perception: Gageśas Tattvacintāmaṇi, Jewel of Reflection on The Truth (about Epistemology): The Perception Chapter (pratyakṣa-khaṇḍa), by Stephen Phillips and N. S. Ramanuja Tatacharya. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 127(3), 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ganeri, J. (2010). A study of Indian epistemology: questions of method --A reply to Matthew Dasti and Stephen H. Phillips. Philosophy East & West, 60(4), 541–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guha, N. (2013). No black scorpion is falling: an onto-epistemic analysis of absence. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 41(2), 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, and E. Thompson (eds.) Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–326). Cambridge University Press.

  10. Martin, J., & Dokic, J. (2013). Seeing absence of absence of seeing. Thought, 2(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matilal. B. K. (1968). The Navya-Nyāya doctrine of negation: the semantics and ontology of negative statements in Navya-Nyāya Philosophy. Harvard Oriental Studies Series, 46.

  12. Matilal. B. K. (1986). Perception: an essay on classical Indian theories of knowledge. Oxford: University Press.

  13. McDowell, J. (2009). Criteria, defeasibility, and knowledge. In A. Byrne & H. Logue (Eds.), Disjunctivism: contemporary readings (pp. 75–91). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw, J. L. (2016). Nyāya on the sources of knowledge. In J. L. Shaw (eds.) The collected writings of Jaysankar Lal Shaw: Indian analytic and anglophone philosophy. (pp. 100–173) Bloomsbury Publishing.

  15. Thompson, E. (2015), “Dreamless sleep, the embodied mind, and consciousness: the relevance of a classical Indian debate to cognitive science,” <http://openmind.net/papers/dreamless-sleep-the-embodied-mind-and-consciousness-therelevance-of-a-classical-indian-debate-to-cognitive-science>.

  16. Vaidya, A. (2013). Nyāya perceptual theory: disjunctivism or anti-individualism? Philosophy East & West, 63(4), 562–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaidya, A. (2015). The Nyāya misplacement theory of illusion & the metaphysical problem of perception. In P. Bilimoria & M. Hemmingsen’s (Eds.), Comparative philosophy and J. L. Shaw (pp. 123–140). Dordrecht: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Anand Jayprakash Vaidya or Purushottama Bilimoria.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0551-z.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaidya, A.J., Bilimoria, P. & Shaw, J.L. Absence: An Indo-Analytic Inquiry. SOPHIA 55, 491–513 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0547-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Absence
  • Abhāva
  • Matilal
  • Farennikova
  • Martin & Dokic
  • Nyāya
  • Mīmāṃsā
  • Anupalabdhi