Skip to main content
Log in

The Flexible Rule of the Hermeneut

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Claude Lévi-Strauss, Anthropologie structurale, Plon, 1958 et 1974, rééd. Pocket, 1997, p. 72; English trans. by C. Jacobson and B.G. Schoepf, Structural Anthropology, New York, Basic Books, 1963, p. 57, trans. modified.

  2. Gérard Genette, Figures I, Paris, Seuil, 1966, p. 158, translated from original.

  3. Anthropologie structurale, op. cit., p. 45; trans cit., p. 33.

  4. Claude Lévi-Strauss, ‘Réponses à quelques questions’, Esprit, n° 322, Nov. 1962, p. 637, translated from original.

  5. Ibid.

  6. E. D. Hirsh, Validity in Interpretation, London, Yale University Press, 1967.

  7. Arthur Danto, ‘Deep Interpretation’, in The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art, New York, Columbia University Press, 1986.

  8. Günter Figal, Gegenständlichkeit. Das Hermeneutische und die Philosophie, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck Verlag, 2006.

  9. Martin Heidegger, Einführung in die phänomenologishe Forschung, Gesamtausgabe, Band 17, Francfort, Klostermann, 2006, p. 2, translated from original.

  10. H.-G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1990, p. 264–265 ; English trans. By J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall, Truth and Method, London-New York, Continuum, 2004, (henceforth ‘VM’), p. 277.

  11. Jean-Jacques Rosat, « Inexprimabilité du contenu et langage privé », in J. Bouveresse, D. Chapuis-Schmitz et J.J. Rosat, L’empirisme logique à la limite, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, p. 129, translated from original.

  12. Schleiermacher, General Hermeneutics, trans. by A. Bowie in Hermeneutics and Criticism, and other writings, Cambridge University Press, 1998, (henceforth abbreviated ‘H’), p. 229.

  13. E. Tugendhat, Der Wahrheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1970, p. 331 ff. See also Selbstbewusstsein und Selbstbestimmung, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1979, p. 239.

  14. E. Tugendhat, « The Fusion of Horizons », in Philosophische Aufsätze, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1992, p. 430. This critique has been approved by K.-O. Apel: Transformation der Philosophie, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp,1973, Band I, p. 41–42 .

  15. Wittgenstein, Philosophische Untersuchungen, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 2001 ; English translation, Philosophical Investigations, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 4th edition, (abbreviated ‘PI’), I, §86.

  16. Aristotle, Physics, II, 8, 199 b 28.

  17. For an interpretation of this distinction in Kant inspired by Wittgenstein, cf. J. Floyd, ‘Heautonomy : Kant on Reflective Judgement and Systematicity’, in Kants Ästhetik/Kant’s Aesthetics/L’esthétique de Kant, H. Parret (ed.), Berlin-New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1998.

  18. Nicomachean Ethics, V, 14, 1137 b 29–32 (trans. W. D. Ross).

  19. Ricœur already asserted in his 1963 article ‘Structure et herméneutique’: ‘never shall we be able to do hermeneutics without structuralism,’ (Esprit, n° 322, nov. 1962, p. 653, translated from original). He reaffirms this statement in Du texte à l’action where structural analysis and hermeneutics are said to be ‘complementary’ (op. cit., p. 172).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claude Romano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romano, C. The Flexible Rule of the Hermeneut. SOPHIA 56, 393–402 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0535-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0535-z

Keywords

Navigation