, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 1–18 | Cite as

Optimistic Naturalism: Scientific Advancement and the Meaning of Life

  • Dan Weijers


Naturalist theories of the meaning of life are sometimes criticised for not setting the bar high enough for what counts as a meaningful life. Tolstoy’s version of this criticism is that Naturalist theories do not describe really meaningful lives because they do not require that we connect our finite lives with the infinite. Another criticism of Naturalist theories is that they cannot adequately resolve the Absurd—the vast difference between how meaningful our actions and lives appear from subjective and objective viewpoints. This article proposes a novel view, Optimistic Naturalism, in order to refute these criticisms. Optimistic Naturalism is the view that scientific and technological advancement might allow us to lead Truly Meaningful lives in a purely physical universe by enabling our actions, which we find meaningful partly because they might have particular infinite consequences, to actually have infinite consequences for life. The central tenets of Optimistic Naturalism are Infinite Consequence and Scientific Optimism. By explaining how the correct connection of the subjective and objective meaning of actions can result in True Meaning, Infinite Consequence provides a theoretical blueprint for resolving the Absurd. Scientific Optimism provides reason to think that it is possible to follow that blueprint in a purely physical universe. Therefore, when taken together, these two principles provide relatively plausible reasons to think that at least one kind of Naturalist theory can connect the finite with the infinite in a meaningful way and resolve the Absurd.


The meaning of life Scientific advancement Optimistic Naturalism Infinite Consequence Scientific Optimism The Absurd Tolstoy True Meaning 


  1. Aguirre, A. (2006). Where did it all come from? Sky & Telescope 36–41Google Scholar
  2. Boylan, M. (2008). The good, the true and the beautiful: A quest for meaning. New York: Continuum International.Google Scholar
  3. Darwall, S. (1983). Impartial reason. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Farhi, E., & Guth, A. (1987). An obstacle to creating a universe in the laboratory. Physics Letters B, 183(2), 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farhi, E., Guth, A., & Guven, J. (1990). Is it possible to create a universe in the laboratory by quantum tunneling? Nuclear Physics B, 339, 417–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischler, W., Morgan, D., & Polchinski, J. (1990a). Quantum nucleation of false vacuum bubbles. Physics Review D, 41, 2638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischler, W., Morgan, D., & Polchinski, J. (1990b). Quantization of false-vacuum bubbles: a hamiltonian treatment of gravitational tunneling. Physics Review D, 42, 4042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flew, A. (1963). Tolstoi and the meaning of life. Ethics, 73(2), 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guendelman, E., & Portnoy, J. (1999). The universe out of an elementary particle? Classical Quantum Gravity, 16, 3315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guendelman, E., & Portnoy, J. (2001). Almost classical creation of a universe. Modern Physics Letters A, 16, 1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurka, T. (1993). Perfectionism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kaku, M. (2004). Parallel worlds: A journey through creation, higher dimensions, and the future of the Cosmos. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  14. Krauss, L., & Starkman, G. (2000). Life, the universe, and nothing: life and death in an ever-expanding universe. The Astrophysical Journal, 531, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Metz, T. (2001). The concept of a meaningful life. American Philosophical Quarterly, 38(2), 137–153.Google Scholar
  17. Metz, T. (2002). Recent work on the meaning of life. Ethics, 112, 781–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Metz, T. (2003). The immortality requirement for life’s meaning, Ratio (new series), XVI 2 June 2003 0034–0006: 161–177.Google Scholar
  19. Metz, T. (2007). New developments in the meaning of life. Philosophy Compass, 2(2), 196–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Metz, T. (2008). The meaning of life, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition).
  21. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Railton, P. (1984). Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality, repr. In S. Sheffler (Ed.), Consequentialism and its critics (pp. 93–133). New York: Oxford University Press. 1988.Google Scholar
  23. Sakai, N., Nakao, K.-I., Ishihara, H., & Kobayashi, M. (2006). Is it possible to create a universe out of a monopole in the laboratory? Physics Review D, 74, 024026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singer, I. (1996). Meaning in life, Volume 1: The creation of value. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Starobinsky, A. (2000). Future and origin of our universe: modern view. Gravitation and Cosmology, 6, 157–163.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, R. (1981). The meaning of life. In E. D. Klemke (Ed.), The meaning of life (pp. 167–175). New York: Oxford University Press. 2nd edition 2000.Google Scholar
  27. Tolstoy, L. (1940). My confession. London: Oxford University Press. Translated by A. Maude.Google Scholar
  28. Tolstoy, L. (2000). My confession. In E. D. Klemke (Ed.), The meaning of life (2nd ed., pp. 11–20). New York: Oxford University Press. Reprint from the 1905 Leo Wiener translation published by J. M. Dent in London.Google Scholar
  29. Wolf, S. (1997). Happiness and meaning: two aspects of the good life. Social Philosophy and Policy, 14, 207–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy ProgrammeVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations