Sophia

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 543–559

Camus and Nihilism

Article

Abstract

Camus published an essay entitled ‘Nietzsche and Nihilism,’ which was later incorporated into The Rebel. Camus' aim was to assess Nietzsche's response to the problem of nihilism. My aim is to do the same with Camus. The paper explores Camus' engagement with nihilism through its two major modalities: with respect to the individual and the question of suicide in The Myth of Sisyphus, and with respect to the collective and the question of murder in The Rebel. While a Nietzschean influence thoroughly suffuses both books, it is in the second that Camus' most explicit, and most critical, engagement with the German philosopher takes place. The crux of Camus' critique of Nietzsche is that the absolute affirmation of existence he proposes as a response to nihilism cannot say ‘no’ to murder. In the terms of Camus' discussion in The Rebel, Nietzsche's philosophy is thus culpable in the straying of rebellion from its own foundations and its slide into bloody revolution. First, the paper argues that Camus' criticisms of Nietzsche are misplaced. Camus focuses his analysis on sections of the problematic text The Will to Power and misses important sections of Nietzsche's published texts which in fact support the condemnation of revolution which is the project of The Rebel. However, the paper argues that Camus moves beyond Nietzsche in radically democratizing the response to nihilism. While Nietzsche's hopes for the creation of meaning are focused on exceptional individuals, Camus insists that any response to nihilism needs to be accessible to the average person. Such a move is laudable, but it raises a number of questions and challenges regarding the type of problem nihilism is, and how these might be addressed.

Keywords

Albert Camus Nihilism Friedrich Nietzsche Absurdity Thomas Nagel 

References

  1. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment (trans: Cumming, J.). London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Ansell-Pearson, K. (1994). An introduction to Nietzsche as political thinker: the perfect Nihilist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camus, A. (1971). The rebel (trans: Bower, A.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. Camus, A. (2000a). The myth of Sisyphus (trans: O’Brien, J.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Camus, A. (2000b). The outsider (trans: Loredo, J.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Camus, A. (2007). Exile and the kingdom (trans: Cosman, C.). London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  7. Conway, D. W. (1997). Nietzsche and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G. (1983). Nietzsche and philosophy (trans: Tomlinson, H.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Descartes, R. (1912). A discourse on method, etc. (trans: Veitch, J.). London: J.M. Dent and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Detwiler, B. (1990). Nietzsche and the politics of aristocratic radicalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can’t do: A critique of artificial reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dreyfus, H. (1993). Heidegger on the connection between Nihilism, art, technology, and politics. In C. Guignon (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Heidegger. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Duvall, W. E. (1999). Camus reading Nietzsche: rebellion, memory, and art. History of European Ideas, 25, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (1998). The Question of Being. In W. McNeill (Ed.), Pathmarks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kaufmann, W. (1975). Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre. New York: Meridian.Google Scholar
  16. Nagel, T. (1979). ‘The absurd’ in Mortal questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nietzsche, F. (1986). Human, all too human (trans: Hollingdale, R.J.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nietzsche, F. (2005). The anti-christ in the anti-christ, ecce homo, twilight of the idols, and other writings, A. Ridley (Ed.), (trans: Norman, J.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rancière, J. (2006). The politics of aesthetics. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Schnädelbach, H. (1984). Philosophy in Germany 1831–1933 (trans: Matthews, E.). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Todd, O. (1998). Albert Camus: A life (trans: Ivry, B.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  22. Vattimo, G. (1992). ‘Disenchantment and Dissolution’ in The Transparent Society (trans: Webb, D.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, C. (2004). Dreaming to Some Purpose: An Autobiography. London: Century.Google Scholar
  24. Woodward, A. (2009). Nihilism in postmodernity. Aurora, Colorado: The Davies Group.Google Scholar
  25. Woodward, A. (2011). Understanding Nietzscheanism. Chesham: Acumen.Google Scholar
  26. Young, J. (2010). Friedrich Nietzsche: A philosophical biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Melbourne School of Continental PhilosophyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations