Sophia

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 557–575 | Cite as

Love, Power and Consistency: Scotus’ Doctrines of God’s Power, Contingent Creation, Induction and Natural Law

Article

Abstract

I first examine John Duns Scotus’ view of contingency, pure possibility, and created possibilities, and his version of the celebrated distinction between ordained and absolute power. Scotus’ views on ethical natural law and his account of induction are characterised, and their dependence on the preceding doctrines detailed. I argue that there is an inconsistency in his treatments of the problem of induction and ethical natural law. Both proceed with God’s contingently willed creation of a given order of laws, which can be revoked and replaced with a new order of laws. In the case of ethical natural law God promulgated the Decalogue, for example; in the case of nature, there are physical laws that can be known by induction. Scotus exalts the freedom of God and the mutability of ethical natural law in order to explain exceptions to it disclosed by revelation (for example, the Old Testament command to Abraham to kill Isaac). Yet he treats ethical natural laws as (mostly) not universal and immutable. In contrast, he holds that we can arrive at knowledge of the universal and immutable laws of nature, except for those regularities that result from free will. Finally, I present several ways of characterising this tension between Scotus’ doctrines.

Keywords

John Duns Scotus Natural law Power of God Contingency Transubstantiation Induction 

References

  1. Beck, A. J. (1998). ‘Divine psychology’ and modalities: Scotus’s theory of the neutral proposition. In E. P. Bos (Ed.), John Duns Scotus (1265/6–1308): Renewal in philosophy (pp. 123–137). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchette, O. (1992). The perfection of the universe according to Aquinas: A teleological cosmology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brampton, C.K. (1968). Scotus and the doctrine of the ‘potentia dei absoluta’. In De doctrina Ioannis Duns Scoti, Studia scholastico-scotistica II (pp. 567–574). Rome: n.p.Google Scholar
  4. Burr, D. (1972). Scotus and transubstantiation. Mediaeval Studies, 34, 336–360.Google Scholar
  5. Courtenay, W. J. (1984). The dialectic of omnipotence in the high and late middle ages. In T. Rudavsky (Ed.), Divine omniscience and omnipotence in medieval philosophy (pp. 243–269). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. Courtenay, W. J. (1990). Capacity and volition: A history of the distinction of absolute and ordained power. Bergamo: P. Lubrina.Google Scholar
  7. Cross, R. (1998). The physics of Duns Scotus: The scientific context of a theological vision. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  8. Elkatip, S. (1995). Individuation and Duns Scotus. Medioevo, 21, 509–526.Google Scholar
  9. Gelber, H. G. (2004). It could have been otherwise: Contingency and necessity in Dominican theology at Oxford (pp. 1300–1350). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffmann, T. (2009). Duns Scotus on the origin of the possibles in the divine intellect. In S. F. Brown, T. Dewender, & T. Kobusch (Eds.), Philosophical debates at Paris in the early fourteenth century (pp. 359–382). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knuuttila, S. (1981a). Duns Scotus’ criticism of the ‘statistical’ interpretation of modality. In W. Kluxen et al. (Eds.), Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter, Miscellanea Mediaevalia 13 (pp. 441–450). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Knuuttila, S. (1981b). Time and modality in scholasticism. In S. Knuuttila (Ed.), Reforging the great chain of being: Studies of the history of modal theories, Synthese historical library 20 (pp. 163–257). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  13. Knuuttila, S. (1996). Duns Scotus and the foundations of logical modalities. In L. Honnefelder, M. Dreyer, & R. Wood (Eds.), John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and ethics (pp. 127–143). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  14. Mercken, H. P. F. (1998). Necessity and the moral order: Scotus’s interpretation of the Lex naturae in the perspective of western philosophical ethics. In E. P. Bos (Ed.), John Duns Scotus (1265/6–1308): Renewal in philosophy (pp. 171–182). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  15. Milbank, J. (1997). The word made strange: Theology, language, culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Milbank, J., & Pickstock, C. (2001). Truth in Aquinas. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Milbank, J., Ward, G., & Pickstock, C. (1999). [Introduction] Suspending the material: the turn of radical orthodoxy. In J. Milbank, C. Pickstock, & G. Ward (Eds.), Radical orthodoxy: A new theology (pp. 1–20). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Möhle, H. (2003). Scotus’s theory of natural law. In T. Williams (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Duns Scotus (pp. 312–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mondadori, F. (2004). The independence of the possible according to Scotus. In O. Boulnois et al. (Eds.), Duns Scot à Paris, 1302–2002 (pp. 313–374). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  20. Normore, C. (1996). Scotus, modality, instants of nature and the contingency of the present. In L. Honnefelder, M. Dreyer, & R. Wood (Eds.), John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and ethics (pp. 161–174). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  21. Normore, C. (2003). Duns Scotus’s modal theory. In T. Williams (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Duns Scotus (pp. 129–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Owens, J. (1994). The need for christian philosophy. Faith and Philosophy, 11(2), 167–183.Google Scholar
  23. Pasnau, R. (2003). Cognition. In T. Williams (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Duns Scotus (pp. 285–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pickstock, C. (1998). After writing: On the liturgical consummation of philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Pini, G. (2004). Substance, accident and inherence: Scotus and the Paris debate on the metaphysics of the Eucharist. In O. Boulnois et al. (Eds.), Duns Scot à Paris, 1302–2002 (pp. 273–311). Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  26. Pini, G. (2005). Scotus’s realist conception of the categories: His legacy to late medieval debates. Vivarium, 43(1), 63–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scotus, D (1639). Opera omnia. Lyons: L. Wadding (Ed.).Google Scholar
  28. Scotus, D (1891–1895). Opera omnia: Editio nova iuxta editionem Waddingi. Paris: L. Vivès.Google Scholar
  29. Scotus, D. (1950–). Opera omnia, Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.Google Scholar
  30. van de Lecq, R. (1998). Duns Scotus on the reality of possible worlds. In E. P. Bos (Ed.), John Duns Scotus (1265/6–1308): Renewal in philosophy (pp. 91–96). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  31. Vanhoozer, K. J. (2003). Theology and the condition of postmodernity. In K. J. Vanhoozer (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to postmodern theology (pp. 3–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Veldhuis, H. (2000). Ordained and absolute power in Scotus’ Ordinatio I 44. Vivarium, 38(2), 222–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vos, A. (2000). The Scotian notion of natural law. Vivarium, 38(2), 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vos, A. (2003). Duns Scotus on divine love: Texts and commentary on goodness and freedom, God and humans. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  35. Vos, A. (2006). The philosophy of John Duns Scotus. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wolter, A. B. (1966). John Duns Scotus: A treatise on God as first principle. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCatholic Theological College (Melbourne College of Divinity)East MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations