Skip to main content
Log in

Morality, Politics and Mytho-Poetic Discourse in the Oldest System-Programme for German Idealism: The Rousseauian Answer to a Contemporary Question

  • Published:
Sophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the relation between mytho-poetic narrative and practical philosophy in an Idealist/Romantic fragment, usually attributed to Hegel, known as the ‘System-programme’. Like many works of the young Hegel, the text seeks political reform through a reform of religion and suggests that for politics to be truly motivating reason must be embedded in mytho-poetic discourse. This Hegelian ‘reform’ is in the service of a new, sensuous, practical rationality and a motivating political praxis. The paper places these issues in the context of the religious thought of J.J. Rousseau, particularly his religious themes, as presented in The Social Contract. The paper also connects these issues to a political problem identified in recent work by Simon Critchley, the problem of practical or moral motivation. Critchley claims that while citizens of secular, liberal, democratic societies experience the political norms that shape their lives as externally binding, these norms are not internally compelling. Against this he claims that what are motivating are frameworks of belief that call the secular project into question. At least one of Critchley’s solutions to this problem is connected to the sphere of the religious. While accepting the idea that connecting social and political problems to religion can render them motivating, this paper will withhold from endorsing either the solution offered by the young Hegel in the ‘System-programme’ or Critchley’s, and raises doubts also about the Rousseauian response. It argues that these solutions fail to adequately address the problem they face: how to render contemporary political life internally compelling for modern political subjects?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This text has received considerable attention both in the popular and academic presses. In regard to the popular press the text precipitated a heated public debate between Critchley and S. Žižek that featured in such forums as The London Review of Books and Harper’s Magazine (see S. Žižek LRB, 29:22, 15 November, 2007 and, LRB 30:2, 24 January, 2008; see also S. Critchley HM, May, 2008). In regard to academic papers the debate was the focus of a special edition of Critical Horizons Journal.

  2. Here Critchley is stressing the ambiguous status of the legislator. The legislator belongs neither to the order of nature nor the order of politics and so is not like normal human agents, yet who legislates for society without being part of it, nor subject to its laws, gives force to the law. Of course the legislator is not in fact divine, the aura of divinity is fictional and serves a political role, it lends the law the force of majesty; the fiction of divinity thus serves a political end and is thus subordinate to that political end.

  3. Michael suggested this in a paper presented to the Annual Conference of The Hegel Society of Great Britain. Oxford, UK: August, 2003.

  4. This is surely also interesting in terms of any kind of neo-anarchist project, such as the one that Critchley announces in his Infinitely Demanding (2007). For surely such a project cannot be founded on a pessimism in regard to human nature; surely such a project must have as its foundation a positive philosophical anthropology.

References

  • Beiser, F. C. (1992). Enlightenment, revolution and romanticism: The genesis of modern German political thought, 1790-1800. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiser, F. C. (1999). The context and problematic of post-Kantian philosophy. In S. Critchley & W. R. Schroeder (Eds.), A companion to continental philosophy (pp. 21–34). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (2007a). Infinitely demanding: ethics of commitment politics of resistance. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (2007b). Catechism of the citizen: politics, law and religion in, after, with and against Rousseau. Law and humanities, 1, 79–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamme, C., & Schneider, H. (1984). Mythology der Vernunft: Hegels > ältestes Systemprogramme < des deutschen Idealismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H. S. (1972). Hegel’s development: Toward the sunlight 1770-1801. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H. S. (1981). Religion as the mythology of reason. Thought, 56(222), 302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1972). Tübingen fragment. In H. S. Harris (Ed.), Hegel’s development: Toward the sunlight 1770-1801 (pp. 490–508). Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1989). Gesammelte werke. In F. Nicolin und G. Schüler (Eds.), Frühe Schriften 1 682 (pp.94-138). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag 683

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1998). Elements of the philosophy of right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1996). In R. Tuck (Ed.), Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1996). An answer to the question: what is enlightenment? In M.J Gregor (Trans.), Practical philosophy (pp.16-22). New York: Cambridge University Press

  • Kant, I. (1998). In P. Guyer & A. W. Wood (Eds.), Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meld Shell, S. (2004). Organizing the state. Transformations of the body politic in Rousseau, Kant and Fichte. In K. Ameriks & J. Stolzenberg (Eds.), International yearbook of German idealism (pp. 49–73). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkard, T. (2000). Hegel: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadrio, P. A. (2009a). Kant and Rousseau on the critique of philosophical theology: the primacy of practical reason. Sophia: International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Philosophical Theology and Ethics, 48, 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadrio, P.A. (2009b). Speaking to the people: Critchley, Rousseau and the deficit in practical Rationality. In R. Sinnerbrink and P. Quadrio (Eds.), Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, 10 (2), 209-224

  • Quadrio, P. A. (2010). Toward a theory of organic relations: Hegel’s social theory from Tubingen to Jena. Berlin: Lambert Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.J. (1968). The social contract. M. Cranston (Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

  • Sinnerbrink, R., & Quadrio, P. A. (2009). Special edition: Ethics of commitment and politics of resistance: Simon Critchley’s Neo-Anarchism. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, Acumen, 10(2).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Andrew Quadrio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quadrio, P.A. Morality, Politics and Mytho-Poetic Discourse in the Oldest System-Programme for German Idealism: The Rousseauian Answer to a Contemporary Question. SOPHIA 50, 625–640 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-010-0223-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-010-0223-3

Keywords

Navigation