Abstract
In this brief response to Herbert De Vriese’s The Charm of Disenchantment, his attempt to link secularism and modernity is questioned. Criticism is leveled at De Vriese’s use of the correspondence between Voltaire and Frederick the Great without reference to the historical context, notably the confessional states that existed between roughly 1650 and 1800 in Europe. De Vriese’s apology for disenchantment and modernity is also questioned in the light of both modern religious and secular responses to modernity as exemplified by the Dalai Lama and Bernard Stiegler.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achterhuis, H. (1988). Het rijk van de schaarste. Van Thomas Hobbes tot Michel Foucault. Utrecht: Ambo/Baarn.
Baumann, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Eisenstadt, S.N. (2003). Comparative civilizations & multiple modernities (v.1 and 2). Leiden: Brill.
Illich, I. (2005). The rivers north of the future. The testament of Ivan Illich as told to David Cayley. Toronto: House of Anansi Press Inc.
Löwith, K. (1949). Meaning in history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Milbank, J. (2006). Theology and social theory: Beyond secular reason. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stiegler, B. (2005). De la misère symbolique. 2. La catastrophè du sensible. Paris: Galilée.
Stiegler, B. (2006). Réenchanter le monde: La valeur esprit contre le populisme industriel. Paris: Flammarion.
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rossouw, J. Secularity and Modernity? A Brief Response to Herbert De Vriese. SOPHIA 49, 429–432 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-010-0198-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-010-0198-0