Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Les défis psychiques des nouvelles temporalités en cancérologie — Diagnostic rapide de cancer du sein : quels bénéfices pour les patientes ?

Psychic challenges of new temporalities in cancerology — Fast diagnosis of breast cancer: What benefit for the patients?

  • Article Original / Original Article
  • Published:
Psycho-Oncologie

Résumé

L’objet de cet article est de faire le point sur le rationnel scientifique du diagnostic rapide de cancer du sein. Nous faisons également le point sur l’impact psychologique d’un tel dispositif. La mise en place d’un programme de parcours rapide nécessite de répondre à certaines contraintes organisationnelles et techniques, mais il constitue un enjeu à la fois économique et scientifique. Permet-il de réduire les délais de prise en charge des patientes ? Il existe à ce jour peu de données sur l’impact psychique du parcours rapide, et ces données restent controversées. Les données concernant l’évaluation du parcours rapide sont insuffisantes pour conclure à un bénéfice en termes de raccourcissement des délais diagnostiques et thérapeutiques, ainsi qu’en termes d’impact psychique.

Abstract

The object of this article is to review the scientific rationale of fast diagnosis of breast cancer.We also point out the psychological impact of such a device. The establishment of a fast program, of course, not only requires answering certain organizational constraints and techniques but also constitutes an economic and scientific challenge. Does it make it possible to reduce the times of assumption of responsibility of the patients? There exists to date little data on the psychic impact of the fast course, and these data remain discussed. The data concerning the evaluation of the fast course are insufficient to conclude a benefit in terms of reducing the diagnostic and therapeutic delays, and in terms of psychic impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. http://www.lesdonnees.e-cancer.fr. Les données du cancer en France, édition 2013. Institut national du cancer

  2. Richards MA, Westcombe AM, Love SB, et al (1999) Influence of delay on survival in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. Lancet 353:1119–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coates AS (1999) Breast cancer: delays, dilemmas, and delusions. Lancet 353:1112–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sainsbury JR, Johnston C, Haward B (1999) Effect on survival of delays in referral of patients with breast cancer symptoms: a retrospective analysis. Lancet 353:1132–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arndt V, Stürmer T, Stegmaier C, et al (2003) Provider delay among patients with breast cancer in Germany: a populationbased study. J Clin Oncol 21:1440–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Latarche C, Desandes E, Mayeux D, et al (2004) Provider delays among patients with breast cancer in a Regional Cancer Care Network: feasibility of personal care schedule. Bull Cancer 91:965–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Olivotto IA, Bancej C, Goel V, et al (2001) Waiting times from abnormal breast screen to diagnosis in 7 Canadian provinces. CMAJ 165:277–83

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brett J, Austoker J, Ong G (1998) Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment. J Public Health Med 20:396–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. http://www.unicancer.fr./la-journée-sein. UNICANCER — La « Journée Sein

  10. Haute Autorité de santé. Projet et réflexion interdisciplinaires: chemin clinique « Parcours rapide du sein

  11. http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Plan_cancer_2014-2019.pdf. Plan cancer 2014–2019. Institut national du cancer

  12. Bulte JP, Polman L, Schlooz-Vries M, et al (2013) One day core needle biopsy in a breast clinic: 4 years experience. Breast Cancer Res Treatment 137:609–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hegyi K, Lonborg C, Monus A, et al (2013) One day FISH approach for the high-speed determination of HER2 gene copy status in breast carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 21:567–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berman A, Teig B, Duracinsky M, et al (2015) Diagnostic en un jour des lésions du sein: évaluation médicale et psychologique de la prise en charge — étude EVADIASEIN. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  15. http://www.efec.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/La-vie-2-ans-apresun- diagnostic-de-cancer-2014-V2-ENQUETE-VICAN2.pdf

  16. Agence nationale d’accréditation et d’évaluation en santé (2002) Chirurgie des lésions mammaires: prise en charge de première intention. Anaes 2002

    Google Scholar 

  17. Blamey RW (1998) The British Association of Surgical Oncology Guidelines for surgeons in the management of symptomatic breast disease in the UK (1998 revision). BASO Breast Specialty Group. Eur J Surg Oncol 24:464–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. European Guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition (2006)

  19. Arnaout A, Smylie J, Seely J, et al (2013) Improving breast diagnostic services with a Rapid Access Diagnostic and Support (RADS) Program. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3335–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiemens BG, VonKorff M, Lin EH (1999) Diagnosis of depression by primary care physicians versus a structured diagnostic interview. Understanding discordance. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 21:87–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, et al (2011) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies. Lancet Oncol 12:160–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  23. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association Press, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Holland JC, Andersen B, Breitbart WS, et al NCCN Distress Management Panel (2010) Distress management. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8(4):448–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bultz BD, Carlson LE (2013) A commentary on “effects of screening for psychological distress on patient outcomes in cancer: a systematic review”. J Psychosom Res 75:18–9. doi: 10.1016/ j.jpsychores.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 28. No abstract available

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brocken P, Prins JB, Dekhuijzen PN, et al (2012) The faster the better? — A systematic review on distress in the diagnostic phase of suspected cancer, and the influence of rapid diagnostic pathways. Psycho-Oncology 21:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Perczek RE, Burke MA, Carver CS, et al (2002) Facing a prostate cancer diagnosis: who is at risk for increased distress? Cancer 94:2923–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seklehner S, Hladschik-Kermer B, Lusuardi L, et al (2013) Psychological stress assessment of patients suffering from prostate cancer. Scand J Urol 47:101–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Bergh J, et al (2001) Short- and long-term anxiety and depression in women recalled after breast cancer screening. Eur J Cancer 37:463–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stanton AL, Snider PR (1993) Coping with a breast cancer diagnosis: a prospective study. Health Psychol 12:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Harcourt D, Ambler N, Rumsey N, et al (1998) Evaluation of a one-stop breast lump clinic: a randomized controlled trial. The Breast 4:314–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hi SS, Shaw P, Wright S, et al (1996) Anxiety in patients with symptomatic breast disease: effects of immediate versus delayed communication of results 33. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:466–9

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dey P, Bundred N, Gibbs A et al (2002) Costs and benefits of a one stop clinic compared with a dedicated breast clinic: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 324:507

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre de lutte contre le cancer François-Baclesse, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, BP 5026, F-14076, Caen cedex, France

    A. Jamard

  2. Service de pathologie mammaire, centre de lutte contre le cancer François-Baclesse, 3, avenue du Général-Harris, BP 5026, F-14076, Caen cedex, France

    C. Segura-Djezzar

Authors
  1. A. Jamard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Segura-Djezzar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. Jamard or C. Segura-Djezzar.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jamard, A., Segura-Djezzar, C. Les défis psychiques des nouvelles temporalités en cancérologie — Diagnostic rapide de cancer du sein : quels bénéfices pour les patientes ?. Psycho Oncologie 9, 204–208 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-015-0538-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-015-0538-y

Mots clés

Keywords

Search

Navigation