Résumé
Objectif
Identifier les déterminants de l’adhésion au dépistage du cancer colorectal (CCR) en se fondant sur la théorie du comportement planifié (TCP) et le concept de coping.
Matériel et méthodes
Les attitudes, les normes sociales, le contrôle perçu, le coping et l’intention de se faire dépister ont été évalués auprès de 132 participants âgés de 50 à 74 ans.
Résultats
L’intention est prédite par les antécédents de dépistage, des attitudes favorables, les normes sociales et le coping centré sur le problème.
Conclusion
Ces résultats apportent des pistes d’actions pour améliorer le dépistage.
Abstract
Aim
Identify the determinants of colorectal cancer screening adherence based on the theory of planned behavior and the concept of coping.
Material and methods
Attitudes, social norms, perceived control, coping and intention to be tested were evaluated with 132 participants aged 50 to 74 years.
Results
The intention is predicted by screening past behaviors, positive attitudes, social norms, and problem-focused coping.
Conclusion
These results provide indications to improve screening.
Références
Haute Autorité de santé (2013) Dépistage et prévention du cancer colorectal: actualisation du référentiel de pratiques de l’examen périodique de santé (EPS)
Varela A, Jandorf L, Duhamel K (2010) Understanding factors related to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among urban Hispanics: use of focus group methodology. J Cancer Educ 25:70–5
Clavarino A, Janda M, Hughes K, et al (2004) The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT. Prev Med 39:482–90
Garcia AZG (2012) Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening participation. Gastroenterol Res Pract–http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/483417
Weitzman E, Zapka J, Estabrook B, et al (2001) Risk and reluctance: understanding impediments to colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 32:502–13
Jones R, Devers K, Kuzel AW, et al (2010) Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis. Am J Prev Med 38:508–16
Bridou M (2012) Étude des principaux freins et leviers psychologiques envers l’examen de dépistage du cancer colorectal: le rôle particulier de l’anxiété envers la santé dans l’adoption de cette démarche. (Thèse de doctorat en psychologie, université François-Rabelais de Tours, Tours)
Kudadjie-Gyamfi E, Magai C (2008) The influence of coping styles on mammography screening in a multiethnic sample. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 14:183–92
Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211
Cooke R, French, DP (2008) How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis. Psychol Health 23:745–65
McEvoy-Devellis S, Blalock SJ, Sandler RS (2006) Predicting participation in cancer screening: the role of perceived behavioral control. J Appl Soc Psychol 20:639–60
Sieverding M, Matterne U, Ciccarello L (2010) What role do social norms play in the context of men’s cancer screening intention and behavior? Application of an extended theory of planned behavior. Health Psychol 29:72–81
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Psychology Press (Appendix: constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire), New York
Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, et al (2004) Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour. A manual for health services researchers–http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/1735
Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Fernandez ME (2013) Understanding Cervical Cancer Screening Intentions among Latinas Using An Expanded Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Behav Med 39:66–72
Bauerle-Bass S, Gordon T, Burt-Ruzek S, et al (2011) Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening in urban African American clinic patients: differences by gender and screening status. J Cancer Educ 26:121–8
Norman P, Conner M (1996) Predicting health-check attendance among prior attenders and non-attenders: the role of prior behavior in the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 26:1010–26
Berglund G, Nilsson S, Nordin K (2005) Intention to test for prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 41:990–7
Hahm MI, Choi KS, Kye SY, et al (2007) Factors influencing the intention to have stomach cancer screening. J Prev Med Public Health/Yebang Uihakhoe Chi 40:205–12
Sheeran P (2002) Intention–Behavior Relations: a conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 12:1–36
Goodman M, Ogdie A, Kanamori M, et al (2006) Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening among mid-atlantic Latinos: Focus group findings. Ethn Dis 16:255–61
Katz M, Heaner S, Reiter P, et al (2009) Development of an educational video to improve patient knowledge and communication with their healthcare providers about colorectal cancer screening. Am J Health Educ 40:220–8
Neter E, Stein N, Barnett-Griness O, et al (2014) From the bench to public health. Population-level implementation intentions in colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 46:273–80
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Bonniec, A.L., Djoufelkit, K. & Cousson-Gélie, F. Quels sont les facteurs psychosociaux déterminant la participation au dépistage du cancer colorectal ? Intérêt de la théorie du comportement planifié et du concept de coping. Psycho Oncologie 9, 108–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-015-0522-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-015-0522-6