Skip to main content
Log in

Intérêt et nature de la prise en charge dite psychologique du patient et son entourage dans le suivi hospitalier des tumeurs du système nerveux. À propos de l’expérience d’une équipe dédiée

Interest and nature of the psychological care for patients and close relations in a medical dedicated neuro-oncology unit

  • Article Original / Original Article
  • Published:
Psycho-Oncologie

Résumé

La neuro-oncologie repose principalement sur le suivi des tumeurs du système nerveux (majoritairement malignes). D’importants progrès ont été récemment constatés. Demeurent, malgré tout, des situations difficiles caractérisées par la majoration progressive de déficits fonctionnels à l’origine d’une dépendance et de l’engagement du pronostic vital. L’impact psychologique est majeur pour le patient, son entourage et les soignants. Nous décrivons l’adaptation de l’équipe à cette situation et la prise en charge pragmatique proposée aux différentes phases de la maladie.

Abstract

The main interest of Neuro-Oncology is central nervous system tumors (mostly malignant). Significant improvements have recently been observed, however, difficult situations with gradual increase of potentially life-threatening functional deficits causing dependence still remain. The psychological impact is significant for the patient, his entourage and the caregivers. We describe the teams’ adaptation to this situation and the pragmatic care offered at the different phases of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Anderson SI, Taylor R, Whittle IR (1999) Mood disorders in patients after treatment for primary intracranial tumours. Br J Neurosurg 13:480–485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bampoe J, Ritvo P, Bernstein M (1998) Quality of life in patients with brain tumor: what’s relevant in our quest for therapeutic efficacy. Neurosurg Focus 4:e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosma I, Reijneveld JC, Douw L, et al (2009) Health-related quality of life of long-term high-grade glioma survivors. Neuro Oncol 11:51–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Catt S, Chalmers A, Fallowfield L (2008) Psychosocial and supportive-care needs in high-grade glioma. Lancet Oncol 9:884–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies E, Clarke C (2005) Views of bereaved relatives about quality of survival after radiotherapy for malignant cerebral glioma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:555–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies E, Hall S, Clarke C (2003) Two year survival after malignant cerebral glioma: patient and relative reports of handicap, psychiatric symptoms and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 25:259–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Edvardsson T, Ahlström G (2008) Being the next of kin of a person with a low-grade glioma. Psychooncology 17:584–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edvardsson T, Ahlström G (2005) Illness-related problems and coping among persons with low-grade glioma. Psychooncology 14:728–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giovagnoli AR, Silvani A, Colombo E, Boiardi A (2005) Facets and determinants of quality of life in patients with recurrent high grade glioma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:562–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Heimans JJ, Taphoorn MJ (2002) Impact of brain tumour treatment on quality of life. J Neurol 249:955–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrmann M, Curio N, Petz T, et al (2000) Coping with illness after brain diseases—a comparison between patients with malignant brain tumors, stroke, Parkinson’s disease and traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 22:539–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang ME, Wartella J, Kreutzer J, et al (2001) Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumours: a review of the literature. Brain Inj 15:843–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McDonald A (2009) Living with a benign brain tumour. BMJ 339:b2886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Menkes DB, Davison MP, Costello SA, Jaye C (2005) Stereotactic radiosurgery: the patient’s experience. Soc Sci Med 60: 2561–2573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Muñoz C, Juarez G, Muñoz ML, et al (2008) The quality of life of patients with malignant gliomas and their caregivers. Soc Work Health Care 47:455–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salander P, Spetz A (2002) How do patients and spouses deal with the serious facts of malignant glioma? Palliat Med 16: 305–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taphoorn MJ, Heimans JJ, Snoek FJ, et al (1992) Assessment of quality of life in patients treated for low-grade glioma: a preliminary report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55:372–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Whittle IR, Midgley S, Georges H, et al (2005) Patient perceptions of “awake” brain tumour surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:275–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Taillandier.

About this article

Cite this article

Lanfroy, R., Busch, E., Colmar, K. et al. Intérêt et nature de la prise en charge dite psychologique du patient et son entourage dans le suivi hospitalier des tumeurs du système nerveux. À propos de l’expérience d’une équipe dédiée. Psycho Oncologie 4, 72–83 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-010-0257-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-010-0257-3

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation