Skip to main content
Log in

Psychological risk factors for colorectal cancer?

Facteurs de risque psychologiques du cancer colorectal ?

  • Article Original
  • Published:
Psycho-Oncologie

Abstract

The paper deals with personality correlates of colorectal cancer patients in the framework of the cognitive orientation theory. The cognitive-motivational approach and the construction and testing of a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing the personality correlates of colorectal cancer are reviewed in the first part. In the second part in a new sample of 230 colorectal cancer patients the themes in the questionnaire are clustered and their structure is tested in a confirmatory factor analysis. Further, following the expectation that colorectal cancer is gender bound, the differences in the themes and belief types are applied to testing differences between men and women corresponding to the medical differences. Finally the questionnaire was applied to identifying the detected personality correlates in an attenuated form in a sample of Crohn’s disease patients who are known to be at risk for colorectal cancer. Discriminant analysis showed that the questionnaire provided a highly significant correct identification of cases of the three groups (165 healthy controls, 90 patients with Crohn’s disease and 230 colorectal cancer patients). The thematic clusters that constitute the personality correlates of colorectal cancer were found to be tendencies for compulsiveness, control of oneself and especially of anger, self effacement, pleasing others, self assertion, distancing oneself from others, keeping regulations, and performing to perfection all ones obligations. The three major foci of these tendencies are perfect duty performance, and two contradictory pairs: self effacement versus self assertion, and closeness to others versus distancing from others. The clusters and the contrasts constitute potentially sources of tension. It is suggested that the identified personality correlates be considered as psychological risk factors for colorectal cancer.

Résumé

Cet article traite des caractéristiques de personnalité des patients atteints de cancer colorectal (CCR) dans le cadre d’une théorie de la personnalité d’orientation cognitive. Cette approche dite motivationnelle-cognitive, ainsi que la construction d’un questionnaire validé et fiable pour mesurer les caractéristiques de personnalité liées au cancer colorectal, sont développées dans la première partie. Dans la seconde partie, à partir d’un nouvel échantillon de 230 patients atteints de CCR, les thèmes du premier questionnaire ont été rangés en clusters et leur structure a été validée par une nouvelle analyse factorielle. Ensuite, partant du fait que le CCR se manifeste sur un plan médical de manière différente en fonction du sexe, les différences dans les thèmes et les types de croyances, ont été mises en application pour tester des différences hommes/femmes correspondant à ces différences médicales. Enfin, le questionnaire a été appliqué pour identifier les mêmes caractéristiques de personnalité mises en évidence, dans une moindre mesure, chez des patients atteints de maladie de Crohn, connus pour être à risque de cancer colorectal. L’analyse statistique a montré que le questionnaire permettait d’identifier de manière significative les caractéristiques de personnalité de chaque groupe. Le modèle en structure thématique du questionnaire a été pertinent pour discriminer les différences entre les trois groupes ainsi qu’entre les hommes et les femmes (groupe contrôle, n = 165; patients atteints de maladie de Crohn, n = 90; patients atteints de cancer colorectal, n = 230). Les clusters thématiques trouvés (ou variables de personnalité du CCR), font ressortir les tendances à la compulsivité, au contrôle de soi et spécialement de la colère, l’auto-effacement, le fait de se rendre agréable aux autres, l’auto-affirmation, la distanciation des autres, l’attachement aux règles et le besoin de perfection dans les tâches. On peut dire que ces tendances se manifestent en trois tendances majeures: L’accomplissement d’un travail parfait et deux tendances contradictoires, l’auto-effacement et l’auto-affirmation d’une part, et d’autre part, la proximité des autres et la distanciation. Ces clusters et oppositions peuvent constituer des sources de tension. Il est proposé que les traits de personnalité identifiés puissent être considérés comme des facteurs de risque psychologique du CCR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amelang M (1997) Using personality variables to predict cancer and heart disease. Eur J Personal 11: 319–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anarte MT, Lopez AE, Ramirez C, et al. (2000) Evaluacion del paron de conducta tipo C en pacientes cronicos. Anales de Psicologia 16: 133–141

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cerhan JR, Cantor KP, Williamson K, et al. (1998) Cancer mortality among Iowa farmers: recent results, time trends, and lifestyle factors (United States). Cancer Causes Control 9: 311–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobrin GM, Abreu MT (2005) Defects in mucosal immunity leading to Crohn’s disease. Immunol Rev 206: 277–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cosnes J (2004) Tobacco and IBD: relevance in the understanding of disease mechanisms and clinical practice. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 18: 481–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuthbert A, Fisher S, Mirza M, et al. (2002) The contribution of NOD2 gene mutations to the risk and site of disease in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 122: 867–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Denollet J (1998) Personality and risk of cancer in men with coronary heart disease. Psychol Med 28: 991–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Fabio F, Koller M, Nascimbeni R, et al. (2008) Long-term outcome after colorectal cancer resection. Patients’ self-reported quality of life, sexual dysfunction and surgeons’ awareness of patients’ needs. Tumori 94: 30–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Drechsler I, Brunner D, Kreitler S (1987) Cognitive antecedents of coronary heart disease. Soc Sci Med 24: 581–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eysenck HJ (2000) Personality as a risk, In: Kenny DK, Carlson JG, et al. (eds), Stress and Health: Research and Clinical Applications. Harwood Academic, Amsterdam, pp. 291–318

    Google Scholar 

  11. Figer A, Kreitler S, Kreitler MM, et al. (2002). Personality dispositions of colon cancer patients. Gastrointestinal Oncol 4: 81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox B (1998) Psychosocial factors in cancer incidence and prognosis, In: Holland J (ed), Psycho-Oncology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 110–124

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gao RN, Neutel CI, Wai E (2008) Gender differences in colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, hospitalizations and surgical procedures in Canada. J Public Health 30: 194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldacre MJ, Wotton CJ, Yeates D, et al. (2008) Cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and coeliac disease: record linkage study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20: 297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodkin K, Antoni MH, Sevin B, et al. (1993) A partially testable predictive model of psychosocial factors in the etiology of cervical cancer. I. Biological, psychological and social aspects. Psycho-Oncology 2: 79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kavan MG, Engdahl BE, Kay S (1995) Colon cancer: personality factors predictive of onset and stage of presentation. J Psychosom Res 39: 1031–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kotake K, Honjo S, Sugihara K, et al. (2003) Changes in colorectal cancer during a 20-year period: an extended report from the multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer, Japan. Dis Colon Rectum 46: S32–S43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kreitler H, Kreitler S (1982) The theory of cognitive orientation: Widening the scope of behavior prediction. In: Maher B, Maher WB (eds), Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Vol. 11. Academic Press, New York, pp. 101–169

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kreitler S (2003) Psycho-Oncology. In: Cohen LM, McChargue DE, Collins FL Jr. (eds), The health psychology handbook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, pp. 325–358

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kreitler S (2004) The cognitive guidance of behavior. In: Jost JT, Banaji MR, Prentice DA (eds), Perspectivism in Social Psychology: The Yin and Yang of scientific progress. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp. 113–126

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreitler S, Kreitler H (1991) Cognitive orientation and physical disease or health. Eur J Personal 5: 109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kreitler S, Kreitler H (1991) The psychological profile of the health-oriented individual. Eur J Personal 5: 35–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kreitler S, Kreitler H (1998) Cognitive orientation and disease in cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 1: 174

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kreitler S, Kreitler H, Chaitchik S (1993) Repressiveness: Cause or result of cancer? Psycho-Oncology 2: 43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kreitler S, Levavi H, Bornstein G (1996) Personality factors and cervical premalignancy. Personal Individu Dif 21: 883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kune GA, Kune S, Watson LF, et al. (1991) Personality as a risk factor in large bowel cancer: Data from the Melbourne Colorectal Cancer Study. Psychol Med 21: 29–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lilja AO, Smith G, Malmstroem P, et al. (1998) Psychological profile related to malignant tumors of different histopathology. Psycho-Oncology 7: 376–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Loader S, Shields C, Rowley PT (2005) Impact of genetic counseling and DNA testing on individuals with colorectal cancer with a positive family history: a population based study. Genet Testing 9: 313–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McKenna MC, Zevon MA, Corn B, et al. (1999) Psychosocial factors and the development of breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol 18: 520–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meropol NJ, Buzaglo JS, Miller SM (2006) Genetic and family-related issues within a complex disease model: Colorectal cancer. In: Miller SM, McDaniel SH, Rolland JS, et al. (eds), Individuals, families, and the new era of genetics: Biopsychosocial perspectives. WW Norton & Co, New York, pp. 320–342

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moradi T, Gridley G, Bjork J, et al. (2008) Occupational physical activity and risk for cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden among men and women by anatomic subsite. Eur J Cancer Prev 17: 201–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Newcomb PA, Baron J, Cotterchio M, et al. (2007) Colon Cancer Family Registry: an international resource for studies of the genetic epidemiology of colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16: 2331–2343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nock NL, Thompson CL, Tucker TC, et al. (2008) Associations between obesity and changes in adult BMI over time and colon cancer risk. Obesity 16: 1099–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nurymberg K, Kreitler S, Weissler K (1996) The cognitive orientation of compliance in short-and long-term type 2 diabetic patients. Patient Edu Counsel 29: 25–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Park HM, Hong SH, Kim JW, et al. (2007) Gender-specific association of the VEGF −2578C — A polymorphism in Korean patients with colon cancer. Anticancer Res 27(4B): 2535–2539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Prescott NJ, Fisher SA, Franke A, et al. (2007) A nonsynonymous SNP in ATG16L1 predisposes to ileal Crohn’s disease and is independent of CARD15 and IBD5. Gastroenterology 132: 1665–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Press OA, Zhang W, Gordon MA, et al. (2008) Gender-related survival differences associated with EGFR polymorphisms in metastatic colon cancer. Cancer Res 68: 3037–3042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reif S, Klein I, Lubin F, et al. (1997) Pre-illness dietary factors in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 40: 754–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, et al. (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2005, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2005/, based on November 2007 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sales DJ, Kirsner JB (1983) The prognosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Arch Intern Med 143: 294–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sanderman R, Ranchor AV (1997) The predictor status of personality variables: Etiological significance and their role in the course of disease. Eur J Personal 11: 359–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Servaes P, Vingerhoets AJJM, Vreugdenhil G, et al. (1999) Inhibition of emotional expression in breast cancer patients. Behav Med 25: 23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Smedslund G (1995) Personality and vulnerability to cancer and heart disease: Relations to demographic and life-style variables. Personal Individ Dif 19: 691–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Temoshok L, Heller BW, Sagebiel RW, et al. (1985) The relationship of psychosocial factors to prognostic indicators in cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Psychosom Res 29: 139–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. von Roon AC, Reese G, Teare J, et al. (2007) The risk of cancer in patients with Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 50: 839–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Watson MA, Gay L, Stebbings WS, et al. (2003) Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and colorectal cancer: gender-specific modulation of risk and prognosis. Clin Sci 104: 537–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Xie J, Itzkowitz SH (2008) Cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterology 14: 378–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kreitler.

About this article

Cite this article

Kreitler, S., Kreitler, M.M., Len, A. et al. Psychological risk factors for colorectal cancer?. Psycho Oncologie 2, 131–145 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-008-0094-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11839-008-0094-9

Keywords

Mots clés

Navigation