Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Single-File-Systeme zur maschinellen Wurzelkanalaufbereitung

  • Zahnärztliche Fortbildung
  • Published:
wissen kompakt Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Die Vereinfachung von Abläufen in der Zahnmedizin – einhergehend mit einer verbesserten Erfolgsquote, kürzerer Behandlungszeit und geringeren Kosten – ist seit jeher die Motivation zur Entwicklung neuer Technologien. In der Endodontie war die Einführung von Nickel-Titan-Instrumenten der Meilenstein zur Erleichterung der Aufbereitung auch stark gekrümmter Wurzelkanäle mit reproduzierbar vorhersagbaren Ergebnissen. Unterschiedlichste Systeme sind auf dem Markt etabliert und bereits wissenschaftlich als auch klinisch solide untersucht. Das häufige Wechseln von Instrumenten während der Wurzelkanalaufbereitung und die ungelöste Problematik einer hygienischen Aufbereitung der Instrumente könnten mit der aktuellen Entwicklung der neuen Ein-Feilen-Systeme hinfällig werden. Der folgende Beitrag beschreibt das Design und die spezifischen Eigenschaften der Single-File-Systeme und beantwortet die Frage, ob dieses neue Konzept den konventionellen Mehr-Feilen-Systemen ebenbürtig ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9

Literatur

  1. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH (2005) Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Topics 10:30–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hülsmann M (2000) Entwicklung einer Methodik zur standardisierten Überprüfung verschiedener Aufbereitungsparameter und vergleichende in-vitro-Untersuchung unterschiedlicher Systeme zur maschinellen Wurzelkanalaufbereitung. Quintessenz, Berlin

  3. Petschelt A (1989) Endodontie: Maschinell – manuell? Die Aufbereitung und Spülung des Wurzelkanals. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 44:407–413

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schäfer E, Hickel R, Geurtsen W et al (2000) Wurzelkanalaufbereitungen. Gemeinsame Stellungnahme der DGZMK und der DGZ. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 55:719–721

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schäfer E (1999) Metallurgie und Eigenschaften von Nickel-Titan-Handinstrumenten. Endodontie 8:213

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haikel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G et al (1999) Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 25:434–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schäfer E, Fritzenschaft B (1999) Vergleichende Untersuchung zweier permanent rotierender Wurzelkanalaufbereitungssysteme auf Nickel-Titan-Basis. Endodontie 8:213–215

    Google Scholar 

  8. Szep S, Gerhardt T, Leitzbach C et al (2001) Preparation of severely curved simulated root canals using engine-driven rotary and conventional hand instruments. Clin Oral Investig 5:17–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gambarini G (2000) Rationale for the use of low torque endodontic motors in root canal instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol 16:95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P (2001) Failure of ProFile instruments used with high and low torque motors. Int Endod J 34:471–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D (2004) Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper instruments. J Endod 30: 228–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C et al (2003) Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 29:567–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yared G (2008) Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J 41:339–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncanson MG Jr (1985) The „balanced force“ concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 11:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hou X, Yahata Y, Hayashi Y et al (2011) Phase transformation behaviour and bending property of twisted nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. Int Endod J 44:253–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, Namerow K (2008) Comparison between a novel nickel titanium alloy and 508 Nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of Profile 25/.04 rotary instruments. J Endod 34:1406–1409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ye J, Gao Y (2012) Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue. J Endod 38:105–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg M, Dahan S, Machtou P (im Druck) Centering ability and influence of experience when using WaveOne single-file technique in simulated canals. Int J Dent: Epub 16. Okt. 2012, doi: 10.1155/2012/206321, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118749. Zugegriffen: 08. Feb. 2013

  19. Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS et al (2012) Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 38:541–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gambarini G, Gergi R, Naaman A et al (2012) Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion. Int Endod J 45:802–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gambarini G, Rubini AG, Al Sudani D et al (2012) Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 38:1408–1411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De-Deus G, Barino B, Marins J et al (2012) Self-adjusting file cleaning-shaping-irrigation system optimizes the filling of oval-shaped canals with thermoplasticized gutta-percha. J Endod 38:846–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Solomonov M, Paqué F, Fan B et al (2012) The challenge of C-shaped canal systems: a comparative study of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper. J Endod 38:209–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. West J (2010) The endodontic glidepath: secrets to rotary success. Dent Today 29:86–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mounce R (2005) Endodontic K-Files: invaluable endangered species or ready for the Smithsonian? Dent Today 24:102–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. West J (2006) Endodontic update. J Esthet Restor Dent 18:280–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberg K, Barbakow F (2003) ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: assessment of torque and force in relation to canal anatomy. Int Endod J 36:93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roland DD, Andelin WE, Browning DF et al (2002) The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 28:543–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Mangelli M et al (2012) Buckling resistance of pathfinding endodontic instruments. J Endod 38:402–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lopes HP, Elias CN, Siqueira JF Jr et al (2012) Mechanical behavior of pathfinding endodontic instruments. J Endod 38:1417–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS et al (2011) Effect of canal length and curvature on working length alteration with WaveOne reciprocating files. J Endod 37:1687–1690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G et al (2012) Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 38:101–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pasqualini D, Bianchi CC, Paolino DS et al (2012) Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary PathFile in maxillary first molars curved canals. J Endod 38:389–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Alves Vde O, Bueno CE, Cunha RS et al (2012) Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals. J Endod 38:117–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Uroz-Torres D, González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM (2009) Effectiveness of a manual glide path on the preparation of curved root canals by using Mtwo rotary instruments. J Endod 35:699–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bürklein S, Benten S, Schäfer E (im Druck) Shaping ability of different single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Ind Endod J: Epub 13. Dez. 2013, doi:10.1111/iej.12037, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iej.12037/abstract. Zugegriffen: 08. Feb. 2013

  37. Bürklein S, Schäfer E (2012) Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems. J Endod 38:850–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Metzger Z, Zary R, Cohen R et al (2010) The quality of root canal preparation and root canal obturation in canals treated with rotary versus self-adjusting files: a three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod 36:1569–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Paqué F, Ganahl D, Peters OA (2009) Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. J Endod 35:1056–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Paqué F, Peters OA (2011) Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file. J Endod 37:517–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Peters OA, Laib A, Gohring TN, Barbakow F (2001) Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod 27:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Peters OA, Paqué F (2011) Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 37:53–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Weiger R, Bruckner M, ElAyouti A, Lost C (2003) Preparation of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments compared to Lightspeed instruments and NiTi hand files. Int Endod J 36:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wu MK, Sluis LW van der, Wesselink PR (2003) The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J 36:218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B et al (2010) The effect of apical preparation size on irrigant flow in root canals evaluated using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J 43:874–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boutsioukis C, Gogos C, Verhaagen B et al (2010) The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics model. Int Endod J 43:909–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hülsmann M (2008) Endodontie, 1. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart

  48. Merino A, Estevez R, Gregorio C de, Cohenca N (im Druck) The effect of different taper preparations on the ability of sonic and passive ultrasonic irrigation to reach the working length in curved canals. Int Endod J: Epub 11. Sep. 2012, doi:10.1111/iej.12006, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23062105. Zugegriffen: 08. Feb. 2013

  49. Munoz HR, Camacho-Cuadra K (2012) In vivo efficacy of three different endodontic irrigation systems for irrigant delivery to working length of mesial canals of mandibular molars. J Endod 38:445–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E (2012) Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 45:449–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. -Baumann MA (2012) WaveOne – first experience of third-year students. Roots 2:20–23

    Google Scholar 

  52. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS et al (2012) Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. J Endod 38:505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Arias A, Perez-Higueras JJ, Macorra JC de la (2012) Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance at apical and coronal levels of Reciproc and WaveOne new files. J Endod 38:1244–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G et al (im Druck) Cyclic fatigue resistance of two reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments after immersion in sodium hypochlorite. Int Endod J: Epub 26. Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2591.2012.02100.x, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22831397. Zugegriffen: 08. Feb. 2013

  55. Plotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L, Gambarini G (2012) Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments. Int Endod J 45:614–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bürklein S, Tsotsis P, Schäfer E (im Druck) Incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation: reciprocating versus rotary instrumentation. J Endod: Epub 28 Jan. 2013, doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.11.045, http://www.jendodon.com/article/S0099-2399%2812%2901122-3/abstract. Zugegriffen: 08. Feb. 2013

  57. Azarpazhooh A, Leake JL (2006) Prions in dentistry – what are they, should we be concerned, and what can we do? J Can Dent Assoc 72:53–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Department of Health (UK) (2007) Advice for dentists on the re-use of endodontic instruments and variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease (vCJD). Letter, April 2007. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Advancedsearch/SearchResults/index.htm?bucketVals=1%3B551%3B555%3B597&ph=&ssUrlType=2&ssUrlType=2&ssUrlType=2&ssUrlType=2&searchTerms=Dental%20diseases. Zugegriffen: 08. Feb. 2013

  59. Schneider K, Korkmaz Y, Addicks K, Lang H et al (2007) Prion Protein (PrP) in human teeth: an unprecedented pointer to PrP’s function. J Endod 33:110–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Sonntag D, Peters OA (2007) Effect of prion decontamination protocols on nickel-titanium rotary surfaces. J Endod 33:442–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vassey M et al (2011) A quantitative assessment of residual protein levels on dental instruments reprocessed by manual, ultrasonic and automated cleaning methods. Br Dent J 14:210

    Google Scholar 

  62. Walker JT, Dickinson J, Sutton JM et al (2007) Cleanability of dental instruments–implications of residual protein and risks from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Br Dent J 203:395–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seinen Koautor an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zentrale Interdisziplinäre Ambulanz (ZIA), Zentrum für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1/W30, 48149, Münster, Deutschland

    S. Bürklein & E. Schäfer

Authors
  1. S. Bürklein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Schäfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bürklein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bürklein, S., Schäfer, E. Single-File-Systeme zur maschinellen Wurzelkanalaufbereitung. wissen kompakt 7, 13–26 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-012-0166-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-012-0166-3

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation