Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Aktueller Stand der Wurzelkanalfüllung

Laterale Verdichtung, thermoplastische Verfahren oder doch Single-Cone-Technik?

  • Zahnärztliche Fortbildung
  • Published:
wissen kompakt Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Digitale Medien und vergrößernde Sehhilfen erlauben heute eine gute theoretische und praktische Darstellung des Wurzelkanalsystems. Die mechanische Aufbereitung ermöglicht eine gründlichere Spülung. Aufgabe der Wurzelkanalfüllung ist es, das gesamte Wurzelkanalsystem dauerhaft zu verschließen und vor Mikroorganismen und Flüssigkeit zu schützen. Die postendodontische Restauration unterstützt dies. Der vorliegende Beitrag ordnet die Wurzelkanalfüllung in den Gesamtablauf der endodontischen Behandlung ein. Er stellt die wichtigsten Fülltechniken für Wurzelkanäle mit ihren Vor- und Nachteilen dar und beschreibt ihre klinische Anwendung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10
Abb. 11
Abb. 12
Abb. 13
Abb. 14

Literatur

  1. Paqué F, Peters OA (2011) Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of long oval root canals in mandibular molars with the self-adjusting file. J Endod 37:517–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters OA, Laib A, Göhring TN et al (2001) Changes in root canal geometry after preparation assessed by high-resolution computed tomography. J Endod 27:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peters OA, Paqué F (2011) Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod 37:53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiger R, Brückner M, Elayouti A et al (2003) Preparation of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments compared to Lightspeed instruments and NiTi hand files. Int Endod J 36:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu MK, Van Der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR (2003) The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J 36:218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Europäische Gesellschaft für Endodontologie (2006) Qualitätsrichtlinien endodontischer Behandlung. Konsenspapier der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Endodontologie (European Society of Endodontology). Endodontie 15:387–401

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gillen BM, Looney SW, Gu LS et al (2011) Impact of the quality of coronal restoration versus the quality of root canal fillings on success of root canal treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 37:895–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams JV, Williams LR (2010) Is coronal restoration more important than root filling for ultimate endodontic success? Dent Update 37:187–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schäfer E (2001) Wurzelkanalfüllmaterialien – Ein Überblick. Teil1: Wurzelkanalfüllpasten. Endodontie 10:337–348

    Google Scholar 

  10. AAE Research and Scientific Affairs Committee (2012) Natural rubber latex allergy. AAE position statement. American Association of Endodontists, Chicago. http://www.aae.org/uploadedFiles/Publications_and_Research/Guidelines_and_Position_Statements/Latexmember.pdf. Zugegriffen: 7. März 2013

  11. Costa GE, Johnson JD, Hamilton RG (2001) Cross-reactivity studies of gutta-percha, gutta-balata, and natural rubber latex (Hevea brasiliensis). J Endod 27:584–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamann C, Rodgers PA, Alenius H et al (2002) Cross-reactivity between gutta-percha and natural rubber latex: assumptions vs. reality. J Am Dent Assoc 133:1357–1367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang PB, Vogt K, Gruninger SE et al (2007) The immuno cross-reactivity of gutta percha points. Dent Mater 23:380–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Susini G, Andre C, Charpin D (2006) Gutta-percha does not include main latex allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 96:632–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N (2008) Extended setting shrinkage behavior of endodontic sealers. J Endod 34:90–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kazemi RB, Safavi KE, Spangberg LS (1993) Dimensional changes of endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 76:766–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiener BH, Schilder H (1971) A comparative study of important physical properties of various root canal sealers. II. Evaluation of dimensional changes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 32:928–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Flores DS, Rached FJ Jr, Versiani MA et al (2011) Evaluation of physicochemical properties of four root canal sealers. Int Endod J 44:126–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marin-Bauza GA, Rached-Junior FJ, Souza-Gabriel AE et al (2010) Physicochemical properties of methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. J Endod 36:1531–1536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marin-Bauza GA, Silva-Sousa YT, Da Cunha SA et al (2012) Physicochemical properties of endodontic sealers of different bases. J Appl Oral Sci 20:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Orstavik D, Nordahl I, Tibballs JE (2001) Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. Dent Mater 17:512–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Resende LM, Rached-Junior FJ, Versiani MA et al (2009) A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers. Int Endod J 42:785–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Versiani MA, Carvalho-Junior JR, Padilha MI et al (2006) A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus and epiphany root canal sealants. Int Endod J 39:464–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beer R, Baumann MA, Kielbassa AM (2004) Taschenatlas der Endodontie. Thieme, Stuttgart—

  25. Mamootil K, Messer HH (2007) Penetration of dentinal tubules by endodontic sealer cements in extracted teeth and in vivo. Int Endod J 40:873–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bergmans L, Moisiadis P, De Munck J et al (2005) Effect of polymerization shrinkage on the sealing capacity of resin fillers for endodontic use. J Adhes Dent 7:321–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Monticelli F et al (2005) Effectiveness of resin-coated gutta-percha cones and a dual-cured, hydrophilic methacrylate resin-based sealer in obturating root canals. J Endod 31:659–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim YK, Grandini S, Ames JM et al (2010) Critical review on methacrylate resin-based root canal sealers. J Endod 36:383–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rödig T (2010) Aktuelle Untersuchungen zur Anwendung von Resilon als Wurzelkanalfüllmaterial. Endodontie 19:69–79

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rödig T, Hülsmann M, Paqué F (2005) Adhäsive Wurzelkanalfüllmaterialien – Eine Literaturübersicht. Endodontie 14:363–378

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shanahan DJ, Duncan HF (2011) Root canal filling using Resilon: a review. Br Dent J 211:81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ingle JI (1961) A standardized endodontic technique utilizing newly designed instruments and filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 14:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kerekes K, Tronstad L (1977) Morphometric observations on root canals of human anterior teeth. J Endod 3:24–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu MK, R’oris A, Barkis D et al (2000) Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:739–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu MK, Kast’akova A, Wesselink PR (2001) Quality of cold and warm gutta-percha fillings in oval canals in mandibular premolars. Int Endod J 34:485–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu MK, Wesselink PR (2001) A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 34:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. American Association of Endodontists (1994) Glossary: contemporary terminology for endodontics, 5th edn. American Association of Endodontists, Chicago/IL

  38. Dang DA, Walton RE (1989) Vertical root fracture and root distortion: effect of spreader design. J Endod 15:294–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH (1999) Load and strain during lateral condensation and vertical root fracture. J Endod 25:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Berry KA, Loushine RJ, Primack PD et al (1998) Nickel-titanium versus stainless-steel finger spreaders in curved canals. J Endod 24:752–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schmidt KJ, Walker TL, Johnson JD et al (2000) Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless-steel spreader penetration and accessory cone fit in curved canals. J Endod 26:42–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sobhi MB, Khan I (2003) Penetration depth of nickel titanium and stainless steel finger spreaders in curved root canals. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 13:70–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson BL, Baumgartner JC (2003) Comparison of spreader penetration during lateral compaction of.04 and.02 tapered gutta-percha. J Endod 29:828–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gharai SR, Thorpe JR, Strother JM et al (2005) Comparison of generated forces and apical microleakage using nickel-titanium and stainless steel finger spreaders in curved canals. J Endod 31:198–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Joyce AP, Loushine RJ, West LA et al (1998) Photoelastic comparison of stress induced by using stainless-steel versus nickel-titanium spreaders in vitro. J Endod 24:714–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jerome CE, Hicks ML, Pelleu GB Jr (1988) Compatibility of accessory gutta-percha cones used with two types of spreaders. J Endod 14:428–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gani O, Visvisian C, De Caso C (2000) Quality of apical seal in curved canals using three types of spreaders. J Endod 26:581–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gound TG, Riehm RJ, Odgaard EC et al (2001) Effect of spreader and accessory cone size on density of obturation using conventional or mechanical lateral condensation. J Endod 27:358–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hartwell GR, Barbieri SJ, Gerard SE et al (1991) Evaluation of size variation between endodontic finger spreaders and accessory gutta-percha cones. J Endod 17:8–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gutman JL, Witherspoon DE (1998) Obturation of the cleaned and shaped root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC (Hrsg) Pathways of the pulp. Mosby, St Louis, S 258–361

  51. Wesselink P (1995) Die Wurzelkanalfüllung (II). Endodontie 4:269–280

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lindauer PA, Campbell AD, Hicks ML et al (1989) Vertical root fractures in curved roots under simulated clinical conditions. J Endod 15:345–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pitts DL, Matheny HE, Nicholls JI (1983) An in vitro study of spreader loads required to cause vertical root fracture during lateral condensation. J Endod 9:544–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Holcomb JQ, Pitts DL, Nicholls JI (1987) Further investigation of spreader loads required to cause vertical root fracture during lateral condensation. J Endod 13:277–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Haapasalo M, Friedman S, Endal U (2006) Visual endodontics curriculum. Quintessenz, Berlin

  56. Jarrett IS, Marx D, Covey D et al (2004) Percentage of canals filled in apical cross sections – an in vitro study of seven obturation techniques. Int Endod J 37:392–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Schilder H (1967) Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 723–744

  58. Buchanan LS (1994) The continuous wave of condensation technique: a convergence of conceptual and procedural advances in obturation. Dent Today 13(10):80, 82, 84–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr (2010) Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod 36:1–15’

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Vera J, Siqueira JF Jr, Ricucci D et al (2012) One- versus two-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a histobacteriologic study. J Endod 38:1040–1052’

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. De Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR et al (2008) Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study–phase 4: initial treatment. J Endod 34:258–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Poliklinik für Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070, Würzburg, Deutschland

    N. Hofmann

Authors
  1. N. Hofmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Hofmann .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofmann , N. Aktueller Stand der Wurzelkanalfüllung. wissen kompakt 7, 41–56 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-012-0165-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-012-0165-4

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation