Skip to main content
Log in

A Cu-Ni-Ti Alloy with Excellent Softening Resistance Combined with Considerable Hardness and Electrical Conductivity Obtained by the Traditional Aging Process

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To obtain a copper alloy with a higher softening temperature, a Cu-Ni-Ti alloy was obtained by the traditional smelting method. And, on this basis, we discuss the effects of atom percentages of different Ni-Ti alloys and the mass percent of Ni + Ti on the properties of single-stage aging of Cu-Ni-Ti alloys at 600°C. The results indicate that the alloy with a Ni/Ti atomic ratio of 2 and a total Ni + Ti content of 3 wt.% exhibits the best performance match. After aging at 600°C for 8 h, the Cu-Ni-Ti alloy’s softening temperature exceeded 720°C. This property surpasses that of most age-hardened copper alloys. The corresponding hardness and conductivity were 171 HV and 58% IACS, respectively, which is slightly lower than the commonly used time-reinforced copper alloy. After calculation, the Cu-Ni-Ti alloy with a Ni:Ti atomic ratio of 2 and a total Ni + Ti content of 3 wt.% is referred to as the Cu-2.13Ni-0.87Ti alloy. Transmission electron microscopy observations indicated that the precipitated phase in the aged Cu-2.13Ni-0.87Ti alloy consists of dispersed nanoparticles of Ni3Ti, which have a semi-coherent interface relationship with the matrix. Upon holding the peak-aged Cu-2.13Ni-0.87Ti alloy at different temperatures for 1 h, it was noted that the precipitates exhibited significant coarsening. Furthermore, when the holding temperature surpassed 700°C, the rate of coarsening increased significantly, accompanied by a rapid decline in hardness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.M. Sadoun, M.M. Mohammed, A. Fathy, and O.A. El-Kady, J. Market. Res. 9(3), 5024 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Li, W. Zeng, Y. Xie, J. Wang, J. Liang, R.E. Logé, and D. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 778 (2020).

  3. A.G. Raab, D.A. Aksenov, R.N. Asfandiyarov, I.S. Kodirov, and G.I. Raab, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 447, 012088 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Asgari, R. Sharghi-Moshtaghin, M. Sadegh Ahmadi, and P. Pirouz, Philos. Mag. 93(10–12), 1351 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H.S. Ren, X. Wu, B. Chen, H.P. Xiong, and Y.Y. Cheng, Weld. World 61(2), 375 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Cao, S.Z. Han, E.-A. Choi, J.H. Ahn, X. Mi, S. Lee, H. Shin, S. Kim, and J. Lee, J. Alloys Compd. 843, 156006 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.S. Chen, B. Yang, J.F. Wang, X.P. Xiao, H.M. Chen, and H. Wang, Mater. Res. Express 5(2), 51 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Q.Y. Dong, L.N. Shen, F. Cao, Y.L. Jia, K.J. Liao, and M.P. Wang, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 24(4), 1531 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y.J. Zhou, K.X. Song, J.D. Xing, and Y.M. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd. 658, 920 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W.N. Liao, X.F. Liu, Y.H. Yang, and M. Du, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 767(1), 38428 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Q.M. Dong, Heat Treat. Met. 30, 182 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L.J. Peng, B.Q. Xiong, G.L. Xie, Q.S. Wang, and S.B. Hong, Rare Met. 32(4), 332 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. I.Z. Awan, and A.Q. Khan, J. Chem. Soc. Pak. 41(1), 1 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.H. Su, S.G. Jia, F.Z. Ren, P. Liu, and B.H. Tian, Adv. Mater. Res. 79–8(2), 1507 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y.L. Jia, Y. Pang, J. Yi, Q. Lei, Z. Li, and Z. Xiao, J. Alloys Compd. 942, 169033 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W.J. Zhu, L.I. Duarte, and C. Leinenbach, Calphad 47, 9 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Zhang, Y. He, F. Yang, H. Liu, and Z. Jin, Thermochim. Acta 574, 121 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Copper Smelting and Processing Engineering Technology Research Center (No. 20231ZDD0205) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (No. 20225BCJ22013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yu Sun: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft. Dongdong Lv and Jinping Liu: Data curation, investigation, conceptualization. ChengjunGuo and Shengda Guo: Investigation, Formal analysis. JianBo Zhang: Supervision, Writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianbo Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Lv, D., Liu, J. et al. A Cu-Ni-Ti Alloy with Excellent Softening Resistance Combined with Considerable Hardness and Electrical Conductivity Obtained by the Traditional Aging Process. JOM (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06665-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06665-5

Navigation