Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling the Progressive Amplitude and Pulsating Tension Fatigue Response of Laser-Powder Bed Fusion Stainless Steel GP1

  • Fatigue and Fracture of Additively Manufactured Materials
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The metal additive manufacturing technology, with its savings in production time and the provision for expansive design capabilities has shown promise in the aerospace industry. Aerospace components have a critical need to be manufactured to endure in-service conditions, which includes durability when subject to variations in cyclic stress/strain loading histories including tensile mean stresses. Pulsating cyclic stresses in the tensile regime have proven detrimental to fatigue life, as they are prone to enhancing the rapid propagation of fatigue cracks. With this consideration, the current study has modeled the experimental fatigue performance of as-built additively manufactured stainless steel (SS) GP1 alloy, when subjected to progressive increases in cyclic strain range loads from Δε = 0.6% to Δε = 1.4%, and pulsating tension fatigue conditions. This is the first study to experimentally capture the cyclic stress–strain curve exhibited by stainless steel GP1 and to use the Chaboche model to model the hysteresis deformation response at varying strain amplitudes, providing a set of optimized Chaboche constants effective in capturing the kinematic/isotropic hardening behavior of this material under progressive amplitude fatigue and pulsating tension fatigue conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.I. Stephens, A. Fatemi, R.R. Stephens, and O.H. Fuchs, Metal Fatigue in Engineering (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Yadollahi, N. Shamsaei, S. Thompson, A. Elwany, and L. Bian, Int. J. Fatigue 94, 218 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.014 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Carneiro, B. Jalalahmadi, A. Ashtekar, and Y. Jiang, Int. J. Fatigue 123, 22 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T.M. Mower and M.J. Long, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 651, 198 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.M. Linares, J. Chaves-Jacob, Q. Lopez, and J.M. Sprauel, Rapid Prototyp. J. 28, 1182 (2022)

  6. S. Sarkar, C.S. Kumar, and A.K. Nath, Add. Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.044 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Wang, W. Wang, and L. Susmel, Int. J. Fatigue 152, 106412 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Molaei and A. Fatemi, Int. J. Fatigue 145, 106002 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B.M. Schonbauer, M. Fitzka, U. Karr, and H. Mayer, Int. J. Fatigue 142, 105963 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S.F. Siddiqui, K. Rivera, I. Ruiz-Candelario, and A.P. Gordon, Progressive Amplitude Fatigue Performance of Additively Manufactured Stainless Steel Superalloy. Paper presented at the TMS 2021 150th Annual Meeting and Exhibition (2021)

  11. S.F. Siddiqui, Characterization of Anisotropic Mechanical Performance of As-Built Additively Manufactured Metals, (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Central Florida, 2018)

  12. S.F. Siddiqui, N. O’Nora, A. A. Fasoro, and A.P. Gordon, Modeling the influence of build orientation on the monotonic and cyclic response of additively manufactured stainless steel GP1/17-4PH. Presented at the ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 3–9 November 2017

  13. A. Polishetty and G. Littlefair, Int. J. Mater. Mech. Manuf. 7(2), 114 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Macek, R.F. Martins, R. Branco, Z. Marciniak, M. Szala, and S. Wronski, Int. J. Fract. 235, 79 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Halama, M. Pagac, Z. Paska, P. Pavlicek, and X. Chen, Ratcheting Behavior of 3D Printed and Conventionally Produced SS316L Material. Paper presented at the ASME 2019 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference, San Antonio, Texas, 14–19 June 2019

  16. J. Chaboche, Int. J. Plast 5, 247 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P.J. Armstrong and C.O. Frederick, A Mathematical Representation of the Multiaxial Bauschinger Effect, vol 731 (Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Berkeley, CA, 1966)

    Google Scholar 

  18. N.R. O’Nora, Compendium of Thermoviscoplasticity Modeling Parameters for Materials Under Non-Isothermal Fatigue (Honors in the Major in Mechanical Engineering, Bachelors Thesis, University of Central Florida, 2015)

  19. J. Chaboche, Int. J. Plast. 24, 1642 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S.F. Siddiqui, A.A. Fasoro, and A.P. Gordon, Selective laser melting (SLM) of Ni-based superalloys - a mechanics of materials review, in Additive Manufacturing Handbook: Product Development for the Defense Industry. ed. by A.B. Badiru, V.V. Valencia, and D. Liu (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Clausen, D.W. Brown, J.S. Carpenter, K.D. Clarke, A.J. Clarke, S.C. Vogel, J.D. Bernardin, D. Spernjak, and J.M. Thompson, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 696, 331 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.081 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W.E. Luecke, and J.A. Slotwinski, J. Res. Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. 119, 398 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Facchini, N. Vicente, I. Lonardelli, E. Magalini, P. Robotti, and A. Molinari, Adv. Eng. Mater. 12(3), 184 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S.F. Siddiqui, A.A. Fasoro, C. Cole, and A.P. Gordon, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 141(3), 031009 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rohatgi, A. (2021). WebPlotDigitizer (4.5) https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. 1144246, awarded to Sanna Siddiqui. The authors would like to thank Dr. Abiodun A. Fasoro for additively manufacturing the stainless steel GP1 specimens used in this study, which were developed using the EOS M280 system in the Manufacturing Engineering Department at Central State University. The authors would also like to acknowledge assistance in data analysis by Ms. Krystal Rivera, an undergraduate student at Florida Polytechnic University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Florida Polytechnic University, 4700 Research Way, Lakeland, FL, 33805, USA

    Sanna F. Siddiqui

  2. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA

    Nathan O’Nora & Ali P. Gordon

Authors
  1. Sanna F. Siddiqui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathan O’Nora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali P. Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanna F. Siddiqui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siddiqui, S.F., O’Nora, N. & Gordon, A.P. Modeling the Progressive Amplitude and Pulsating Tension Fatigue Response of Laser-Powder Bed Fusion Stainless Steel GP1. JOM 75, 1902–1914 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05656-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05656-8

Search

Navigation