Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Kinetics of Brass Waste by Hydrogen Reduction for Recovery of Valuable Metals

  • Decarbonization of Pyrometallurgical Processes
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gaseous reduction by hydrogen was proposed to decrease carbon dioxide emissions during the recovery of zinc and copper from brass waste. The reduction behavior and kinetics of brass waste were studied at temperatures between 1073 K (800°C) and 1273 K (1000°C) under an Ar-H2 atmosphere. Temporal phase and morphology changes were observed that explained the mechanism of brass waste reduction. Effects of hydrogen partial pressure and temperature on the reduction kinetics were investigated. The reduction rate increased with increase in hydrogen partial pressure and reduction temperature. The reduction kinetics of the brass waste were analyzed using various kinetic model equations for solid-gas reactions. In the first stage, oxygen was released from zinc and copper oxides at the particle boundary of the brass waste, and the reaction was chemically controlled at the interface. Subsequently, metallic zinc was vaporized at random nuclei sites, and the reaction was controlled by the power law. The calculated activation energies were 114.9 kJ/mol and 120.0 kJ/mol, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ö. Kahvecioglu, B. Derin, and O. Yücel, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 112, 95 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Mizuno, S. Kosai, and E. Yamasue, Jom 73, 1828 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Liu, Y. Zou, L. Tao, Z. Ma, D. Liu, P. Zhou, H. Liu, and S. Wang, Small 13, 1700758 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Ahmed, and N.C. Kar, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 53, 3098 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H.U. Sverdrup, A.H. Olafsdottir, and K.V. Ragnarsdottir, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 4, 100007 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Kilicarslan, and M.N. Saridede, Sep. Sci. Technol. 50, 286 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I.M. Ahmed, A.A. Nayl, and J.A. Daoud, J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 20, S280 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J.M.A. Martins, A.S. Guimarães, A.J.B. Dutra, and M.B. Mansur, J. Mater. Res. Technol. 9, 2319 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.M. Abdel Basir, and M.A. Rabah, Hydrometallurgy 53, 31 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Trpcevska, E. Rudnik, B. Holkova, and M. Laubertova, Polish J. Environ. Stud. 27, 1 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Xia, X. Zhang, X. Huang, S. Yang, Y. Chen, and L. Ye, Hydrometallurgy 197, 105475 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T.H. Lee, S.H. Joo, H.H. Nersisyan, M.S. Kong, J.W. Lee, K.W. Park, and J.H. Lee, KONA Powder Part. J. 33, 278 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L.F. Tong, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 23, 11 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H.K. Chen, Scand. J. Metall. 30, 292 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Spreitzer, and J. Schenk, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 50, 2471 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. X. Peng, J. Wang, C. Li, H. Zuo, G. Wang, X. She, and Q. Xue, Jom 73, 2929 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B. Liu, Y. Zhang, Z. Su, Z. Peng, G. Li, and T. Jiang, Jom 69, 1669 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Lv, X. Lv, J. Xiang, K. Hu, S. Zhao, J. Dang, K. Han, and B. Song, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44, 4031 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Wang, J. Zhang, K. Jiao, Z. Liu, and M. Barati, J. Alloys Compd. 729, 874 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Vlaev, N. Nedelchev, K. Gyurova, and M. Zagorcheva, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 81, 253 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. C.E. Guger, and F.S. Manning, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2, 3083 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Lew, A.F. Sarofim, and M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Chem. Eng. Sci. 47, 1421 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J.-J. Lee, C.-I. Lin, and H.-K. Chen, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 32, 1033 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Junca, J.R. De Oliveira, T.A.G. Restivo, D.C.R. Espinosa, and J.A.S. Tenório, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 123, 631 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korean government (MOTIE) (20217510100080, Development of Critical Metal Recovery Technologies (capacity of 200 kg/day) from low-grade solid wastes for the foundation of open access recycling platform).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunsik Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, K., Park, H. Kinetics of Brass Waste by Hydrogen Reduction for Recovery of Valuable Metals. JOM 74, 878–884 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-05117-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-05117-8

Navigation