Ti-V
The thermodynamics of the Ti-V system has been investigated multiple times and several CALPHAD descriptions are available.8,9,10 The reported phase diagrams show inconsistency and can be divided into two groups: one in which the miscibility gap in the β-(Ti,V) phase is metastable (Fig. 1, solid lines) and one where the miscibility gap is stable (Fig. 1, dashed lines). The phase diagram review by Murray 198111 suggested that the β-transus decreases continuously with increasing vanadium content, based on experimental data by Ermanis et al.12 and Molokanov et al.,13 i.e., without a monotectoid reaction (β \( \to \) β1 + β2). Murray concluded that oxygen contamination or insufficiently rapid cooling increased the β-transus temperature and, hence, relied on the data by Ermanis et al.12 in the evaluation. Later, Murray updated the Ti-V review14 and relied instead solely on the study by Nakano et al.15 and suggested a phase diagram that was characterized by a miscibility gap in the β-(Ti,V) phase with a critical temperature of 1123 K and the monotectoid temperature of 948 K. Nakano et al.15 used electrical resistivity measurements and phase analysis by x-ray diffraction analysis of samples with more than 0.10 mass fraction vanadium. Both methods showed evidence of a monotectoid reaction, β \( \to \) β1 + β2, above 948 K. These results, however, are currently questioned due to a study by Fuming and Flower16 that pointed out that the Nakano et al.15 study did not report on the amount of impurities in their materials, in particular oxygen. Fuming and Flower showed in a new study using high-purity samples that there is no evidence of a monotectoid reaction (β \( \to \) β1 + β2) but instead a stable α + β phase field with decreasing β-transus with increasing vanadium content, consistent with the diagram suggested by Murray.11 Fuming and Flower16 also studied Ti-V samples with various impurity levels of oxygen and concluded that increasing oxygen content widens the β1 + β2 miscibility gap and the stable α + β phase field. Consequently, for oxygen alone to be responsible for a monotectoid form of diagram, it must affect both the α and the β phases: i.e., oxygen increases the interaction parameter in the β phase17 and opens the miscibility gap while at the same time it decreases the free energy of the α phase.18 Nowadays, the simple Ti-V phase diagram with only three equilibrium phases (liquid, α and β) and no monotectic reaction is the widely accepted diagram. However, the inconsistencies in the reference literature has led to confusion, and, frequently, outdated Ti-V phase diagrams are being cited, e.g. Ref. 19.
The phase diagram debate described above mainly concerned higher vanadium compositions with a mole fraction ≥ 0.20. It is also important to note that the phase boundary data points on the titanium-rich side are scattered,12,13,20,21 as shown in Fig. 1b. This variation is believed to be caused by different levels of impurities (particularly oxygen). Of the available studies, only that by Molokanov et al.13 measured the vanadium solubility in α-Ti using ultra-pure titanium samples. Their results showed a maximum vanadium solubility with a mole fraction of ≈ 0.037 at 773 K and 873 K. The other works showing smaller vanadium solubility12,20,21 used material of less purity or unspecified purity.
In addition to experimental information for the solid phases in the Ti-V system, a couple of theoretical studies using ab initio methods22,23 are available. Uesugi et al.22 calculated the solution enthalpies using density functional theory (DFT) for both pure titanium (α and β) and pure vanadium (α and β), as well as for dilute solutions (α/β Ti35V1 and Ti1V35). Chinnappan et al.23 calculated the sub-solidus equilibrium phase diagram for Ti-V through cluster expansion, lattice dynamics and Monte Carlo methods combined with DFT and found agreement with CALPHAD assessed experimental phase boundaries without specifying the literature source further.
Experimental data involving the liquid are limited to solidus measurements by Adenstedt et al.20 using optical pyrometry, and to measurement of the titanium and vanadium activity in the liquid.24 To avoid reaction with the crucible, Mills and Kinoshita24 used a technique that involved electromagnetic levitation in an inert atmosphere. In both works, nominally pure titanium and vanadium were used and, therefore, the assertion that the influence of impurities is negligible cannot be assured.
Although the Ti-V equilibrium phase diagram is simple, with only three phases, phase transformations within the system can be complex and involve metastable phases. The β phase can transform to α′ martensite during quenching when richer in titanium or to α″ martensite when richer in vanadium.25,26 At higher vanadium contents, the β phase can also be retained as a metastable phase.26 Furthermore, during the β decomposition, the metastable phase ω can form as a transition phase.26 The formation of ω in quenched-in samples have been studied many times: e.g. using transition electron microscopy/scanning transition electron microscopy (TEM/STEM)27,28,29,30,31,32 and x-ray and neutron diffraction.33,34 The characteristics of the ω phase differ depending on the vanadium content in the alloy. The ω that forms at lower vanadium contents, i.e., less than a mole fraction of about 0.16, has a distorted bcc structure which has a hexagonal34 symmetry, whereas the one forming at higher vanadium contents shows less ω-specific reflections in the diffraction spectra.32,35 This can be explained by a partial collapse of the β structure instead of the complete collapse to the hexagonal structure. Moreover, Ghosh et al.32 concluded that the interface between ω and β is coherent, and that the transformation occurs under two different conditions: firstly, athermally during quenching, and secondly, isothermally during heat treatment, resulting in an elliptical shape of the ω precipitates.
The martensite start temperatures (Ms) and the ω start temperatures (ωs) for the Ti-V system have been measured by several groups,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43 and martensite and ω formation has been studied theoretically.44,45,46,47 The experimental values for the Ms temperature and its composition dependency are relatively consistent, whereas the measurements for ωs scatter noticeably. One reason for the scatter is discussed by Paton and Williams,42 who identified the presence of impurities as one of the sources along with the wide range of techniques being used. Yan and Olson46 have developed a modeling approach and constructed a thermodynamic description of the ω phase in the Ti-V system. For this, they performed differential scanning calorimetry and dilatometry experiments as well as first-principles calculations for substitutional ordered alloys, using the virtual crystal approximation (VCA) and the local self-consistent Green’s function method based on exact muffin-tin orbitals (EMTO).46 From this, they could predict at which vanadium composition T0 (temperature of equal Gibbs energies at equal compositions of two phases) is located at 0 K for both the β \( \to \) α and the β \( \to \) ω transitions. Also, Leibovitch and Rabinkin31 modeled the ω phase based on room-temperature observations.
Ti-O
Several thermodynamic descriptions and phase diagram evaluations48,49,50,51,52,53 are available for the Ti-O system, and a detailed review of all existing thermochemical and phase equilibria information will not be repeated here. However, a thorough discussion about the available information on the titanium-rich side of the system, particularly on the α- and β-transus temperatures and their oxygen dependencies, is motivated due to its importance for the processing of titanium alloys.
In Fig. 2a and b, the different experimental datasets for the phase boundaries in the α/β region of the phase diagram are shown.54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61 There are eight works published of which the newest is from 1978 by Tetot et al.54 This phase boundary determination is limited to 1323 K and is a by-product of a microcalorimetric measurement of the partial molar enthalpy of oxygen in titanium. Tetot et al.54 concluded that their thermochemical measurements differed substantially from earlier studies, which they explained by the higher precision of their measurements. Kubaschewski and Dench55 and Mah et al.61 used thermochemical measurements to determine the phase boundaries, but at 1473 K, and located them at much smaller oxygen contents compared to Tetot et al.54 In addition, the phase boundaries have been determined by metallography,57,58,59 thermoelectric power measurements56 and diffusion couple experiments.60 In the evaluation of the Ti-O system by Murray,52 the data by Jenkins and Worner56 was preferred for the low-temperature part of the α-transus. For higher temperatures, above 1573 K, the two sets of data by Bumps et al.58 and Schofield and Bacon59 scatter and, according to Murray, there is no clear basis for preferring the data of either. The phase boundary determinations for the β-transus by Schofield and Bacon (Fig. 2a) and Bumps et al. (Fig. 2b) are also in disagreement with each other, and the measurements by Schofield and Bacon show higher oxygen solubility in β-Ti, particularly at higher temperatures. However, the results by Schofield and Bacon agree with the results of the diffusion studies by Wasilewski and Kehl,60 which also show higher oxygen β solubility then the Bumps et al. data. The dataset by Schofield and Bacon48 is also generally in better agreement with the data by Jenkins and Worner,56 Jaffee et al.57 and Tetot et al.54 than Bumps et al.58 Furthermore, Schofield and Bacon paid careful attention to impurity levels of the raw materials, used longer treatment times and better temperature control compared to the study by Bumps et al.,58 which is expected to increase the accuracy. It should be noted, however, that large error bars are expected for both datasets and that the error increases with increasing temperature.
α-Ti melts congruently at temperatures around 2173 K at approximately 0.24 mol fraction oxygen, according to optical pyrometric melting data.58,59 Optical pyrometric measurements were also used by Bumps et al. and Schofield and Bacon to determine the peritectic reaction liquid + α-Ti \( \leftrightarrow \) β-Ti. According to Bumps et al., it occurs at 2013 K ± 25 K, and according to Schofield and Bacon at 1993 K ± 25 K. Here, the temperatures measured by Schofield and Bacon are believed to be more accurate as their measurement of the melting temperature of pure titanium (1933 K) is in better agreement with the accepted Ti melting temperature of (1941 K) than the one measured by Bumps et al. (1998 K). Both works used optical pyrometric measurements to determine the solidus and liquidus positions. Such measurements are difficult and the accuracy is expected to be low, in particular for the liquidus positions since the liquid reacted with the molybdenum crucible that they used. Schofield and Bacon used this method to determine the liquidus for oxygen contents above 0.15 mass fraction. In addition, for oxygen contents below 0.25 mass fraction, they determined the liquidus by observing the temperature at which liquid appeared in a deep axial hole in the alloy compact, and below 0.03 mass fraction oxygen, they used hardness measurements carried out on the core of the compacts, which had been liquid. This is a method that depends on the relationship between hardness and oxygen content of as-melted alloys.
The solidus was measured by Bumps et al58 also using the optical pyrometric technique and by metallographic examination of annealed samples. The error bar for the solidus was estimated by the authors to be ± 25 K which should be considered as approximate since their melting temperature of pure titanium is about 50 K off the actual melting temperature of titanium. In conclusion, little is known about the phase equilibria at high temperatures for the Ti-O system, and the available liquidus and solidus data has low accuracy and should only be considered as approximate in the modeling.
The thermochemical properties of α-Ti are relatively well determined: Hepworth and Schuhmann62 measured the titanium activity, Mah et al.61 and Ariya et al.63 reported on the enthalpy of formation, and Komarek and Silver64 measured the O2 partial pressure for α-Ti solid solutions. In the case of β-Ti solid solutions, the O2 partial pressure has been measured by a number of groups.55,65,66,67,68 All these datasets are in relative good agreement69 and, as will be shown in next section, they are also coherent with the α- and β-transus temperatures suggested by Schofield and Bacon, Jenkins and Worner, and Wasilevski and Kehl.56,59,60
Thermodynamic properties of the Magnéli oxides (TinO2n−1) are all well determined and are accurately assessed in the literature.48,49,50,51,53 In the current work, as well as by Hampl and Schmid-Fetzer,48 Cao et al.,50 Cancarevic et al.,49 Fisher53 and Waldner and Eriksson,51 these oxides are described as line compounds. The halite phase (Ti1O1, NaCl structure), on the other hand, shows a large solubility on both sides of the stoichiometric composition which should be accounted for. Experimental evidence exists that vacancies occupy both titanium and oxygen lattice positions,70 although little is known about the different Ti-cations and their site lattice occupancy.
V-O
In the current work, the CALPHAD thermodynamic description of the V-O system published by Yang et al.71 is adopted without modification. Details on experimental and calculated input information are thoroughly reported on by Yang et al. and will not be repeated here.
Ti-V-O
Recently, a CALPHAD description of the Ti-V-O system was published by Yang et al.72 This report focuses mainly on the properties of the Ti-V oxides in the system and includes a highly satisfying summary of the available thermodynamic information. The current work aims to complement the description by Yang et al. with a critical evaluation of the titanium-rich part of the Ti-V system and the effect of oxygen additions. We will therefore mainly concentrate here on the literature data available for the titanium-rich corner. As mentioned in the previous section, the thermodynamic properties of the Ti-V system have shown to be strongly dependent on the impurity levels in the studied samples. Due to the characteristics of the Ti-O phase diagram and the difficulties of completely eliminating the presence of oxygen in practice, oxygen can be regarded as a major impurity in all titanium alloys. Despite its unavoidable presence, few studies on titanium alloys include quantitative information about the oxygen content. In addition, other, often not quantified, impurities such as nitrogen and iron are expected to strongly influence the phase boundaries in titanium systems. This complicates a quantitative assessment of the Ti-V-O system in the titanium corner.
From the experimental studies reviewed in previous sections, it can be concluded that the presence of oxygen decreases the vanadium solubility in α-Ti in addition to decreasing the β-transus temperature.17 Furthermore, as mentioned previously, oxygen is believed to be one of the reasons for the disagreeing Ti-V phase diagrams in the literature.16
Several isothermal sections and isopleths in the Ti-V-O system have been published.73,74 Most of these studies focus on higher oxygen levels and the thermodynamic properties of the oxides. For oxygen contents, low enough for the alloy to be in the α/α − β/β phase regions, only two isothermal sections by Komjathy75 at 1073 K and 1473 K are noted. In that study, the focus was on vanadium-rich alloys and the phase boundary of single-phase β-V was determined metallographically and by using x-ray diffraction. It can be concluded that the oxygen solubility in this phase increases with increasing temperature. Few experimental details were reported by Komjathy, and their results for the binary V-O alloys are not in agreement with the V-O phase diagram.71 Hence, the accuracy of this information is hard to evaluate.
The transformation of ω also shows a dependency on oxygen content. Early studies by Ageyev et al.76 showed that the ω particle size was strongly affected by the amount of oxygen present, where the ω precipitates were much smaller in contaminated samples compared to the purer samples. In addition, Paton and Williams42 concluded that the ω transformation temperature was lowered by the oxygen presence. Oxygen may also play a role in the ω \( \to \) α transformation. The work by Li et al.77 indicates that oxygen-rich regions present at the ω/β interface serve as sites for α formation, as they found oxygen-rich regions in the α phase in close proximity to the ω phase.