JOM

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Enrichment of Gold in Antimony Matte by Direct Smelting of Refractory Gold Concentrate

  • Tianzu Yang
  • Boyi Xie
  • Weifeng Liu
  • Duchao Zhang
  • Lin Chen
Extraction of Precious Metals
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Conventional cyanidation technology achieves low gold recovery when used to process refractory gold concentrate. Based on the geochemical characteristics of gold deposit mineralization, a new method is proposed herein for gold enrichment in antimony matte by smelting of refractory gold concentrate. The effects of the FeO/SiO2 and CaO/SiO2 ratios, smelting temperature, and smelting time on the gold recovery were investigated in detail. The optimum conditions were determined to be FeO/SiO2 ratio of 1.2, CaO/SiO2 ratio of 0.4, smelting temperature of 1200°C, and smelting time of 45 min. The gold content in antimony matte and smelting slag was 96.68 and 1.13 g/t, respectively. The gold, antimony, and arsenic recovery was 97.72%, 26.89%, and 6.56%, respectively, with most of the antimony and arsenic volatilized into dust. Mineral liberation analyzer results showed that the antimony matte mainly consisted of FeS and FeO, with three phases, viz. FeAs, SbAs, and AuSb, embedded between them, indicating that gold was easily enriched with antimony and arsenic during smelting of refractory gold concentrate.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51404296) and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2016M602427).

References

  1. 1.
    T.Z. Yang, Metallurgy and Chemicals of Precious Metals (Changsha: Central South University Press, 2005), pp. 116–127.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Geoffroy and F. Cardarelli, JOM 57, 47 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.J. Li, S. Liu, Y.S. Song, J.K. Wen, G.Y. Zhou, and Y. Chen, Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 23, 1377 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.T. Chen, L.J. Cabri, and J.E. Dutrizac, JOM 54, 20 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    İ. Alp, O. Celep, and H. Deveci, JOM 62, 41 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Venter, S.L. Chryssoulis, and T. Mulpeter, JOM 56, 53 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.G. Dunn and A.C. Chamberlain, Miner. Eng. 10, 919 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Soltani, H. Darabi, R. Badri, and P. Zamankhan, Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 24, 537 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.Z. Mubarok, R. Winarko, S.K. Chaerun, I.N. Rizki, and Z.T. Ichlas, Hydrometallurgy 168, 69 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.R. Nie and Y.R. Suo, Gold Extraction of Refractory Gold Ores (Beijing: Geological Press, 1997), pp. 20–48.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Jiang, Chemistry of Extractive Metallurgy of Gold (Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology Press, 1998), pp. 7–15.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.Z. Yang, S. Rao, W.F. Liu, D.C. Zhang, and L. Chen, Hydrometallurgy 169, 571 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Chen, Eng. Sci. 9, 11 (2007).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.C. Zhang, Q.K. Xiao, T.Z. Yang, W.F. Liu, and L. Chen, in 7th International Symposium on High-Temperature Metallurgical Processing, ed. by J.Y. Hwang, T. Jiang, P.C. Pistorius, G.R.F. Alvear F., O. Yücel, L.Y. Cai, B.J. Zhao, D. Gregurek, and V. Seshadri (TMS, Nashville, Tennessee, 2016), pp. 139-146.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H.L. Luo, W. Liu, W.Q. Qin, R.Z. Liu, Y.X. Zheng, K. Yang, and J.W. Han, Chin. J. Nonferrous Met. 24, 3129 (2014).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tianzu Yang
    • 1
  • Boyi Xie
    • 1
  • Weifeng Liu
    • 1
  • Duchao Zhang
    • 1
  • Lin Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Metallurgy and EnvironmentCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations