Skip to main content
Log in

Recovery of Tungsten and Molybdenum from Low-Grade Scheelite

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With most high-quality tungsten ores being exhausted, the enhancement of low-grade scheelite concentrates processing has attracted a great deal of attention. The objective of this study is to develop a method to maximize the recovery tungsten and molybdenum from a low-grade scheelite via a new acid leaching process followed by solvent extraction. Under optimal conditions (350 g/L H2SO4, 95°C, and 2 h), approximately 99.8% of tungsten and 98% of molybdenum were leached out. In the subsequent solvent extraction process, more than 99% of the tungsten and molybdenum were extracted with a co-extraction system (50% TBP, 30% HDEHP, and 10% 2-octanol in kerosene) using a three-stage cross-flow extraction. The raffinate can be recycled for the next leaching process after replenishing the H2SO4 to the initial value (approximately 350 g/L). Based on these results, a conceptual flowsheet is presented to recover tungsten and molybdenum from the low-grade scheelite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. USGS, Mineral Commodity Summary (2016).

  2. A. Crowson and E.S. Chen, JOM 43, 27 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K.C. Li, JOM 14, 413 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Morales, R.E. Aune, S. Seetharaman, and O. Grinder, JOM 55, 20 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R.P. Singh Gaur, JOM 58, 45 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Li and Z. Zhao, Hydrometallurgy 163, 55 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Z. Zhao, J. Li, S. Wang, H. Li, M. Liu, P. Sun, and Y. Li, Hydrometallurgy 108, 152 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Z. Zhao and H. Li, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 39B, 519 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.P. Martins, Hydrometallurgy 42, 221 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Guan, G. Zhang, and C. Gao, Hydrometallurgy 127, 84 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Yang, B. Xie, R. Wang, S. Xu, J. Wang, and Z. Xu, Hydrometallurgy 164, 97 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Z. Zhao, J. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Liu, J. Li, and W. Zhang, Hydrometallurgy 140, 120 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Zhao and J. Li, United States Patent, No. 8771617 (2013).

  14. P. Wu, Wet-Process Phosphoric-Acid (Beijing: Chemistry Industry Press, 1987), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Keshavarz Alamdari and S.K. Sadrnezhaad, Hydrometallurgy 55, 327 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Z. Li and W. Qin, Liquid–Liquid Extraction (Beijing: Chemistry Industry Press, 2013), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Wang, JOM 58, 47 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A.N. Zelikman, G.M. Voldman, V.K. Rumyantsev, G.N. Ziberov, and V.S. Kagermanian, United States Patent, No. 3969478 (1976).

  19. Q. Zheng and H. Fan, Hydrometallurgy 16, 263 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express sincere thanks to the NSFC (Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 51334008) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongwei Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Yang, J. & Zhao, Z. Recovery of Tungsten and Molybdenum from Low-Grade Scheelite. JOM 69, 1958–1962 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2440-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2440-5

Navigation