Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 68, Issue 7, pp 1780–1792 | Cite as

Evaluation of Select Surface Processing Techniques for In Situ Application During the Additive Manufacturing Build Process

  • Todd A. Book
  • Michael D. Sangid
Article

Abstract

Although additive manufacturing offers numerous performance advantages for different applications, it is not being used for critical applications due to uncertainties in structural integrity as a result of innate process variability and defects. To minimize uncertainty, the current approach relies on the concurrent utilization of process monitoring, post-processing, and non-destructive inspection in addition to an extensive material qualification process. This paper examines an alternative approach by evaluating the application of select surface process techniques, to include sliding severe plastic deformation (SPD) and fine particle shot peening, on direct metal laser sintering-produced AlSi10Mg materials. Each surface processing technique is compared to baseline as-built and post-processed samples as a proof of concept for surface enhancement. Initial results pairing sliding SPD with the manufacture’s recommended thermal stress relief cycle demonstrated uniform recrystallization of the microstructure, resulting in a more homogeneous distribution of strain among the microstructure than as-built or post-processed conditions. This result demonstrates the potential for the in situ application of various surface processing techniques during the layerwise direct metal laser sintering build process.

Keywords

Severe Plastic Deformation Additive Manufacturing Compressive Residual Stress Rake Angle Direct Metal Laser Sinter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

TAB acknowledges support from this work under the Army Advance Civil Schooling Program. MDS would like to thank partial support from DARPA, N66001-14-1-4041. We thank Prof. Srinivasan Chandrasekar and Dr. Anirban Mahato of the Center for Materials Processing and Tribology at Purdue University for their advice and assistance. Prof. Steven Heister provided the original set of AlSi10Mg samples and Ms. Hannah Woods assisted with initially characterizing the surface roughness and hardness of the test specimens upon receipt.

References

  1. 1.
    D. Manfredi, F. Calignano, M. Krishnan, R. Canali, E.P. Ambrosio, S. Biamino, D. Ugues, M. Pavese, and P. Fino, Light Metal Alloys Applications, ed. W.A. Monterio (InTech, 2014), pp. 3–34.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Krishnan, E. Atzeni, R. Canali, D. Manfredi, F. Calignano, E.P. Ambrosio, and L. Iuliano, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advanced Research Virtual Rapid Prototyping, vol, 2009, 2013, pp. 243–248.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Brandl, U. Heckenberger, V. Holzinger, and D. Buchbinder, Mater. Des. 34, 159 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    T. Sakai, A. Belyakov, R. Kaibyshev, H. Miura, and J.J. Jonas, Prog. Mater. Sci. 60, 130 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    L.M. Sochalski-Kolbus, E.A. Payzant, P.A. Cornwell, T.R. Watkins, S.S. Babu, R.R. Dehoff, M. Lorenz, O. Ovchinnikova, and C. Duty, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46A, 2322 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Estrin and A. Vinogradov, Acta Mater 61, 782 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.O. Hall, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. B 64, 747 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.J. Petch, J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 8 (1953).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Guo (PhD thesis Purdue University, 2012).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Mahato, Y. Guo, H. Yeung, and S. Chandrasekar, IOP Conf. Ser., 63, 1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Mahato, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Private Communication, 2015Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.G. Lenard, Primer on Flat Rolling, 1st ed. (Waltham: Elsevier, 2007), p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.L. Devore, Probability and Statisitcs for Engineering and the Sciences, 8th ed. (Boston: Brooks/Cole, 2012), pp. 391.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Gao, Y. Harada, and S. Kumai, Mater. Charact. 107, 1 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Bagheri and M. Guagliano, Surf. Eng. 25, 3 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Oguri, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211, 1395 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.H. Cannon, J.D. Hochhalter, A.W. Mello, G.F. Bomarito, and M.D. Sangid, Microsc. Microanal. 0546–000769, 10 (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aeronautics and AstronauticsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations